基于区位可负担性的包容性公交发展评价及其影响因素

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Changlong Ling , Zhenhua Chen , Jiawen Yang , Tianren Yang
{"title":"基于区位可负担性的包容性公交发展评价及其影响因素","authors":"Changlong Ling ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Chen ,&nbsp;Jiawen Yang ,&nbsp;Tianren Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transit-oriented development (TOD) is broadly hailed as a key strategy for promoting affordable and inclusive urban growth. Yet, housing and transportation unaffordability continues to pose significant challenges to social inclusion in TOD. Prior approaches often overlook the affordability dimension and rarely prioritize inclusion, despite it being a fundamental goal. This study introduces a novel inclusive TOD (iTOD) framework that explicitly integrates affordability into performance assessment. Combining open and big data with official statistics, we measure citywide location affordability indices for two prominent social groups—homebuyers and renters—and incorporate them into an inclusivity evaluation of 302 TOD sites in Shenzhen, China. Using Data Envelopment Analysis, we find that even generally well-developed sites often underperform in terms of inclusivity, with mean iTOD scores only ranging from 0.22 to 0.71 (out of 1)—indicating large potential for improvement. Clustering analysis identifies 20.5% of sites as considerably low-performing iTOD. Spatial regression reveals workforce housing availability as a determinant of inclusivity in some contexts. The findings underscore the need to incorporate affordability and inclusionary housing provision into TOD planning to systematically reflect transit investment effectiveness, ultimately aligning it with equitable urban development. These results offer actionable guidance for integrating affordable housing with high-capacity transit, enabling policymakers to target low-performing sites and advance equitable urban development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104672"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating inclusive transit-oriented development with location affordability and its influencing factors\",\"authors\":\"Changlong Ling ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Chen ,&nbsp;Jiawen Yang ,&nbsp;Tianren Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transit-oriented development (TOD) is broadly hailed as a key strategy for promoting affordable and inclusive urban growth. Yet, housing and transportation unaffordability continues to pose significant challenges to social inclusion in TOD. Prior approaches often overlook the affordability dimension and rarely prioritize inclusion, despite it being a fundamental goal. This study introduces a novel inclusive TOD (iTOD) framework that explicitly integrates affordability into performance assessment. Combining open and big data with official statistics, we measure citywide location affordability indices for two prominent social groups—homebuyers and renters—and incorporate them into an inclusivity evaluation of 302 TOD sites in Shenzhen, China. Using Data Envelopment Analysis, we find that even generally well-developed sites often underperform in terms of inclusivity, with mean iTOD scores only ranging from 0.22 to 0.71 (out of 1)—indicating large potential for improvement. Clustering analysis identifies 20.5% of sites as considerably low-performing iTOD. Spatial regression reveals workforce housing availability as a determinant of inclusivity in some contexts. The findings underscore the need to incorporate affordability and inclusionary housing provision into TOD planning to systematically reflect transit investment effectiveness, ultimately aligning it with equitable urban development. These results offer actionable guidance for integrating affordable housing with high-capacity transit, enabling policymakers to target low-performing sites and advance equitable urban development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以交通为导向的发展(TOD)被广泛认为是促进可负担和包容性城市增长的关键战略。然而,住房和交通负担不起继续对TOD的社会包容构成重大挑战。之前的方法往往忽略了可负担性维度,很少优先考虑包容性,尽管它是一个基本目标。本研究引入了一个新的包容性TOD (iTOD)框架,明确地将可负担性纳入绩效评估。结合公开和大数据与官方统计数据,我们衡量了两个主要社会群体——购房者和租房者——在全市范围内的位置负担能力指数,并将其纳入对中国深圳302个TOD站点的包容性评估。使用数据包络分析,我们发现即使是一般发展良好的网站在包容性方面也经常表现不佳,平均iTOD得分仅在0.22到0.71之间(满分为1),这表明有很大的改进潜力。聚类分析确定20.5%的站点是性能相当低的iTOD。空间回归显示,在某些情况下,劳动力住房可用性是包容性的决定因素。研究结果强调,有必要将可负担性和包容性住房纳入TOD规划,以系统地反映交通投资的有效性,最终使其与公平的城市发展保持一致。这些结果为经济适用房与高容量交通的整合提供了可操作的指导,使政策制定者能够针对表现不佳的地点,促进城市的公平发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating inclusive transit-oriented development with location affordability and its influencing factors
Transit-oriented development (TOD) is broadly hailed as a key strategy for promoting affordable and inclusive urban growth. Yet, housing and transportation unaffordability continues to pose significant challenges to social inclusion in TOD. Prior approaches often overlook the affordability dimension and rarely prioritize inclusion, despite it being a fundamental goal. This study introduces a novel inclusive TOD (iTOD) framework that explicitly integrates affordability into performance assessment. Combining open and big data with official statistics, we measure citywide location affordability indices for two prominent social groups—homebuyers and renters—and incorporate them into an inclusivity evaluation of 302 TOD sites in Shenzhen, China. Using Data Envelopment Analysis, we find that even generally well-developed sites often underperform in terms of inclusivity, with mean iTOD scores only ranging from 0.22 to 0.71 (out of 1)—indicating large potential for improvement. Clustering analysis identifies 20.5% of sites as considerably low-performing iTOD. Spatial regression reveals workforce housing availability as a determinant of inclusivity in some contexts. The findings underscore the need to incorporate affordability and inclusionary housing provision into TOD planning to systematically reflect transit investment effectiveness, ultimately aligning it with equitable urban development. These results offer actionable guidance for integrating affordable housing with high-capacity transit, enabling policymakers to target low-performing sites and advance equitable urban development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信