城市形态对共享单车站使用的影响建模:聚类方法

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Patrick Moore , Amarachi Amaugo , Lipika Deka , Lucy Budd , Stephen Ison
{"title":"城市形态对共享单车站使用的影响建模:聚类方法","authors":"Patrick Moore ,&nbsp;Amarachi Amaugo ,&nbsp;Lipika Deka ,&nbsp;Lucy Budd ,&nbsp;Stephen Ison","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Docked bikeshare schemes have proliferated across UK cities since the first scheme was introduced in 2010. These schemes have been widely adopted for their contributions to decarbonising transport, improving health, and enhancing connectivity through first and last-mile trips. As bikeshare expands to new cities, planners and operators increasingly require a localised understanding of the factors influencing bikeshare use. Urban morphology in UK cities varies widely, however, encompassing differences in street layouts, building design, accessibility, and land use. Meanwhile, industry bikeshare planning guidelines are often broad, without distinguishing between city size and character. These variations pose challenges for bikeshare scheme planning in different settings, emphasising the need for robust, data-driven models that are sensitive to urban context. This paper employs cluster analysis to classify urban areas within several UK cities, with the aim to understand the combined contextual urban factors that influence bikeshare use. This approach, rarely applied in micromobility research, offers a nuanced and unique methodological contribution. The cluster analysis distinguishes between types of residential neighbourhoods, which is a component less commonly incorporated within existing studies. With the data obtained, statistical analysis offers granular insights into the relationship between the built environment and docking station use. It is highlighted that denser residential neighbourhoods with favourable accessibility have consistent associations with trip generation, while accessible suburban neighbourhoods are more varied. The findings have implications for both initial planning and scheme expansion, relevant to station location optimisation, forecasting future demand, fleet size adjustment and integration with existing public transport networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104676"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the influence of urban morphology on bikeshare station use: a clustering approach\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Moore ,&nbsp;Amarachi Amaugo ,&nbsp;Lipika Deka ,&nbsp;Lucy Budd ,&nbsp;Stephen Ison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Docked bikeshare schemes have proliferated across UK cities since the first scheme was introduced in 2010. These schemes have been widely adopted for their contributions to decarbonising transport, improving health, and enhancing connectivity through first and last-mile trips. As bikeshare expands to new cities, planners and operators increasingly require a localised understanding of the factors influencing bikeshare use. Urban morphology in UK cities varies widely, however, encompassing differences in street layouts, building design, accessibility, and land use. Meanwhile, industry bikeshare planning guidelines are often broad, without distinguishing between city size and character. These variations pose challenges for bikeshare scheme planning in different settings, emphasising the need for robust, data-driven models that are sensitive to urban context. This paper employs cluster analysis to classify urban areas within several UK cities, with the aim to understand the combined contextual urban factors that influence bikeshare use. This approach, rarely applied in micromobility research, offers a nuanced and unique methodological contribution. The cluster analysis distinguishes between types of residential neighbourhoods, which is a component less commonly incorporated within existing studies. With the data obtained, statistical analysis offers granular insights into the relationship between the built environment and docking station use. It is highlighted that denser residential neighbourhoods with favourable accessibility have consistent associations with trip generation, while accessible suburban neighbourhoods are more varied. The findings have implications for both initial planning and scheme expansion, relevant to station location optimisation, forecasting future demand, fleet size adjustment and integration with existing public transport networks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003040\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2010年英国推出首个共享单车计划以来,停靠式共享单车计划在英国各城市遍地开花。这些计划已被广泛采用,因为它们有助于降低交通运输的碳排放,改善健康状况,并通过第一英里和最后一英里的旅行加强连通性。随着共享单车扩展到新的城市,规划者和运营商越来越需要对影响共享单车使用的因素有本地化的了解。然而,英国城市的城市形态差异很大,包括街道布局、建筑设计、可达性和土地利用的差异。与此同时,行业共享单车规划指南往往很宽泛,没有区分城市的规模和特点。这些变化对不同环境下的共享单车方案规划提出了挑战,强调需要对城市环境敏感的健壮的、数据驱动的模型。本文采用聚类分析对英国几个城市的城市区域进行分类,目的是了解影响共享单车使用的综合背景城市因素。这种方法很少应用于微流动性研究,提供了一种微妙而独特的方法贡献。聚类分析区分了不同类型的居民区,这是现有研究中较不常见的组成部分。通过获得的数据,统计分析可以深入了解建筑环境和坞站使用之间的关系。该研究强调,具有良好可达性的密集住宅区与出行的产生有着一致的联系,而可达的郊区社区则更加多样化。研究结果对初步规划和计划扩展都有影响,包括优化车站位置、预测未来需求、调整车队规模以及与现有公共交通网络的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling the influence of urban morphology on bikeshare station use: a clustering approach
Docked bikeshare schemes have proliferated across UK cities since the first scheme was introduced in 2010. These schemes have been widely adopted for their contributions to decarbonising transport, improving health, and enhancing connectivity through first and last-mile trips. As bikeshare expands to new cities, planners and operators increasingly require a localised understanding of the factors influencing bikeshare use. Urban morphology in UK cities varies widely, however, encompassing differences in street layouts, building design, accessibility, and land use. Meanwhile, industry bikeshare planning guidelines are often broad, without distinguishing between city size and character. These variations pose challenges for bikeshare scheme planning in different settings, emphasising the need for robust, data-driven models that are sensitive to urban context. This paper employs cluster analysis to classify urban areas within several UK cities, with the aim to understand the combined contextual urban factors that influence bikeshare use. This approach, rarely applied in micromobility research, offers a nuanced and unique methodological contribution. The cluster analysis distinguishes between types of residential neighbourhoods, which is a component less commonly incorporated within existing studies. With the data obtained, statistical analysis offers granular insights into the relationship between the built environment and docking station use. It is highlighted that denser residential neighbourhoods with favourable accessibility have consistent associations with trip generation, while accessible suburban neighbourhoods are more varied. The findings have implications for both initial planning and scheme expansion, relevant to station location optimisation, forecasting future demand, fleet size adjustment and integration with existing public transport networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信