了解未来自动驾驶汽车服务在残疾人和非残疾人用户中的应用

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Shravani Sharma , Roger Woodman , Neel Ocean , Mark T. Elliott
{"title":"了解未来自动驾驶汽车服务在残疾人和非残疾人用户中的应用","authors":"Shravani Sharma ,&nbsp;Roger Woodman ,&nbsp;Neel Ocean ,&nbsp;Mark T. Elliott","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are poised to transform mobility, yet their adoption depends on both subjective and objective factors. While objective factors like cost and accessibility are well studied, subjective factors, such as trust, perceived safety, and wellbeing, become particularly crucial when users may have not yet experienced these new transport modes. Existing research often treats AVs as a singular concept, overlooking the diversity of AV services and their varying appeal across populations. This study bridges this gap by comparing adoption preferences for multiple AV services, including AV Taxis, AV Remote Taxis, AV Micro Cars, AV Private Cars and AV Buses, across disabled and non-disabled populations. Using sentiment analysis and statistical analysis, we examine how wellbeing, assistance availability, design etc. influence transport choices. Findings vary across mental health, physical health, and non-disabled populations for different AV services. These insights provide a framework for policymakers and industry leaders to design equitable and inclusive AV systems globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 101602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users\",\"authors\":\"Shravani Sharma ,&nbsp;Roger Woodman ,&nbsp;Neel Ocean ,&nbsp;Mark T. Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are poised to transform mobility, yet their adoption depends on both subjective and objective factors. While objective factors like cost and accessibility are well studied, subjective factors, such as trust, perceived safety, and wellbeing, become particularly crucial when users may have not yet experienced these new transport modes. Existing research often treats AVs as a singular concept, overlooking the diversity of AV services and their varying appeal across populations. This study bridges this gap by comparing adoption preferences for multiple AV services, including AV Taxis, AV Remote Taxis, AV Micro Cars, AV Private Cars and AV Buses, across disabled and non-disabled populations. Using sentiment analysis and statistical analysis, we examine how wellbeing, assistance availability, design etc. influence transport choices. Findings vary across mental health, physical health, and non-disabled populations for different AV services. These insights provide a framework for policymakers and industry leaders to design equitable and inclusive AV systems globally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动驾驶汽车(AVs)有望改变出行方式,但它们的采用取决于主观和客观因素。虽然成本和可达性等客观因素已经得到了很好的研究,但当用户可能还没有体验过这些新的交通方式时,信任、感知安全性和幸福感等主观因素就变得尤为重要。现有的研究往往将自动驾驶视为一个单一的概念,忽视了自动驾驶服务的多样性及其对不同人群的不同吸引力。本研究通过比较残疾人和非残疾人群体对多种自动驾驶服务的采用偏好,包括自动驾驶出租车、自动驾驶远程出租车、自动驾驶微型车、自动驾驶私家车和自动驾驶巴士,弥合了这一差距。使用情感分析和统计分析,我们研究了福利、援助可用性、设计等如何影响交通选择。不同AV服务的心理健康、身体健康和非残疾人群的调查结果有所不同。这些见解为政策制定者和行业领导者在全球范围内设计公平和包容的自动驾驶系统提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding future adoption of autonomous vehicle services among disabled and non-disabled users
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are poised to transform mobility, yet their adoption depends on both subjective and objective factors. While objective factors like cost and accessibility are well studied, subjective factors, such as trust, perceived safety, and wellbeing, become particularly crucial when users may have not yet experienced these new transport modes. Existing research often treats AVs as a singular concept, overlooking the diversity of AV services and their varying appeal across populations. This study bridges this gap by comparing adoption preferences for multiple AV services, including AV Taxis, AV Remote Taxis, AV Micro Cars, AV Private Cars and AV Buses, across disabled and non-disabled populations. Using sentiment analysis and statistical analysis, we examine how wellbeing, assistance availability, design etc. influence transport choices. Findings vary across mental health, physical health, and non-disabled populations for different AV services. These insights provide a framework for policymakers and industry leaders to design equitable and inclusive AV systems globally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信