通过胎动加速测量记录仪计算胎动增加后的围产期结局

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Eiji Ryo, Hideo Kamata, Keita Yatsuki, Takashi Kosaka, Kazunori Nagasaka
{"title":"通过胎动加速测量记录仪计算胎动增加后的围产期结局","authors":"Eiji Ryo,&nbsp;Hideo Kamata,&nbsp;Keita Yatsuki,&nbsp;Takashi Kosaka,&nbsp;Kazunori Nagasaka","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>There is no consensus in perinatal medicine about what increased fetal movement means.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our purpose was to study the relationship between perinatal outcomes and an increase in gross fetal movement as counted by an objective method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 471 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-second epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as a fetal movement parameter when movement could be recorded for more than 4 h on one night. If the parameter was above the 90th percentile on the previously made reference curve, it was defined as increased movement. Women who showed the increased fetal movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Perinatal abnormalities between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 13,931 h were recorded from 390 women, including 74 and 316 women, respectively, in the study and control groups. There were fewer preterm births (1.4 %), non-cephalic presentations at delivery (0 %), and Cesarean deliveries (25.7 %) in the study group than in the control group (15.5 %, 6.0 %, and 39.9 %; p = 0.0003, 0.031, and 0.024, respectively). There were no significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An increase in long-term gross fetal movement has a protective effect against preterm birth, non-cephalic presentation at birth, and Cesarean delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal outcomes after increased fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder\",\"authors\":\"Eiji Ryo,&nbsp;Hideo Kamata,&nbsp;Keita Yatsuki,&nbsp;Takashi Kosaka,&nbsp;Kazunori Nagasaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>There is no consensus in perinatal medicine about what increased fetal movement means.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our purpose was to study the relationship between perinatal outcomes and an increase in gross fetal movement as counted by an objective method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 471 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-second epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as a fetal movement parameter when movement could be recorded for more than 4 h on one night. If the parameter was above the 90th percentile on the previously made reference curve, it was defined as increased movement. Women who showed the increased fetal movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Perinatal abnormalities between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 13,931 h were recorded from 390 women, including 74 and 316 women, respectively, in the study and control groups. There were fewer preterm births (1.4 %), non-cephalic presentations at delivery (0 %), and Cesarean deliveries (25.7 %) in the study group than in the control group (15.5 %, 6.0 %, and 39.9 %; p = 0.0003, 0.031, and 0.024, respectively). There were no significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An increase in long-term gross fetal movement has a protective effect against preterm birth, non-cephalic presentation at birth, and Cesarean delivery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016132500064X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259016132500064X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于胎动增加意味着什么,围产期医学尚无共识。目的研究围产期结局与用客观方法计算的胎动量增加之间的关系。方法前瞻性队列研究。孕28周后,每周用胎动加速记录仪记录471例孕妇夜间胎动。当一晚可以记录到4次 h以上的胎动时,计算10秒胎动时间与所有胎动时间的比值作为胎动参数。如果该参数高于之前制作的参考曲线的第90个百分位数,则定义为运动增加。表现出至少一次胎动增加的妇女被分为研究组,其他妇女被分为对照组。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较两组围产儿异常情况。结果390例女性共记录13931 h,其中研究组74例,对照组316例。研究组的早产(1.4 %)、分娩时的非头位表现(0 %)和剖宫产(25.7 %)均少于对照组(15.5 %、6.0 %和39.9 %;p = 0.0003、0.031和0.024)。其他围产儿结局无显著差异。结论长期胎动量增加对早产、非头位分娩和剖宫产均有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perinatal outcomes after increased fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder

Introduction

There is no consensus in perinatal medicine about what increased fetal movement means.

Objective

Our purpose was to study the relationship between perinatal outcomes and an increase in gross fetal movement as counted by an objective method.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 471 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-second epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as a fetal movement parameter when movement could be recorded for more than 4 h on one night. If the parameter was above the 90th percentile on the previously made reference curve, it was defined as increased movement. Women who showed the increased fetal movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Perinatal abnormalities between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

A total of 13,931 h were recorded from 390 women, including 74 and 316 women, respectively, in the study and control groups. There were fewer preterm births (1.4 %), non-cephalic presentations at delivery (0 %), and Cesarean deliveries (25.7 %) in the study group than in the control group (15.5 %, 6.0 %, and 39.9 %; p = 0.0003, 0.031, and 0.024, respectively). There were no significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes.

Conclusion

An increase in long-term gross fetal movement has a protective effect against preterm birth, non-cephalic presentation at birth, and Cesarean delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信