P. Ferrer , V. Ramos , M. Durán , D. Maureira , C. Beltrán , A. Afani
{"title":"2012-2023年智利治疗经验患者临床样本中HIV整合酶链转移抑制剂(insis)获得性耐药的流行情况","authors":"P. Ferrer , V. Ramos , M. Durán , D. Maureira , C. Beltrán , A. Afani","doi":"10.1016/j.jve.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely used in HIV treatment, yet few large-scale studies have examined acquired resistance (AR) at the population level. This study assessed the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of AR to INSTIs in Chile over a 12-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 5266 genotypic sequences from ART-experienced individuals with confirmed virological failure and INSTI-based regimens between 2012 and 2023. Resistance-associated mutations were classified using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. Resistance trends were compared between pre-pandemic (2012–2019) and post-pandemic (2020–2023) periods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High AR rates were observed for first-generation INSTIs: raltegravir (28 %) and elvitegravir (27.7 %). Lower resistance levels were found for dolutegravir (8.3 %), bictegravir (8.3 %), and cabotegravir (18.7 %). Major resistance mutations included N155H (25.2 %), Q148 H/K/R (17.2 %), and Y143R (14.3 %). Notably, Q148 H/K/R mutations were always found in combination with other major mutations. Subtype-specific differences were observed, with higher first-generation INSTI resistance in subtype F (55.6 %) than in subtype B (23.9 %). Post-pandemic resistance increased significantly for first-generation INSTIs (25 % vs. 31 %, p < 0.05). The mutation N155H, while not impacting DTG or BIC significantly, conferred intermediate resistance to CAB. CAB resistance was detected despite its absence in treatment protocols, likely due to cross-resistance pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Acquired INSTIs resistance in Chile is high, especially for first-generation drugs. These findings highlight the need for nationwide molecular surveillance and pre-treatment genotyping, particularly before initiating long-acting regimens such as CAB-LA. Strategic monitoring will be critical to maintaining the efficacy of current and next-generation INSTIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Virus Eradication","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of acquired resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in clinical samples from treatment-experienced patients in Chile, 2012–2023\",\"authors\":\"P. Ferrer , V. Ramos , M. Durán , D. Maureira , C. Beltrán , A. Afani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jve.2025.100608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely used in HIV treatment, yet few large-scale studies have examined acquired resistance (AR) at the population level. This study assessed the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of AR to INSTIs in Chile over a 12-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 5266 genotypic sequences from ART-experienced individuals with confirmed virological failure and INSTI-based regimens between 2012 and 2023. Resistance-associated mutations were classified using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. Resistance trends were compared between pre-pandemic (2012–2019) and post-pandemic (2020–2023) periods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High AR rates were observed for first-generation INSTIs: raltegravir (28 %) and elvitegravir (27.7 %). Lower resistance levels were found for dolutegravir (8.3 %), bictegravir (8.3 %), and cabotegravir (18.7 %). Major resistance mutations included N155H (25.2 %), Q148 H/K/R (17.2 %), and Y143R (14.3 %). Notably, Q148 H/K/R mutations were always found in combination with other major mutations. Subtype-specific differences were observed, with higher first-generation INSTI resistance in subtype F (55.6 %) than in subtype B (23.9 %). Post-pandemic resistance increased significantly for first-generation INSTIs (25 % vs. 31 %, p < 0.05). The mutation N155H, while not impacting DTG or BIC significantly, conferred intermediate resistance to CAB. CAB resistance was detected despite its absence in treatment protocols, likely due to cross-resistance pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Acquired INSTIs resistance in Chile is high, especially for first-generation drugs. These findings highlight the need for nationwide molecular surveillance and pre-treatment genotyping, particularly before initiating long-acting regimens such as CAB-LA. Strategic monitoring will be critical to maintaining the efficacy of current and next-generation INSTIs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Virus Eradication\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Virus Eradication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2055664025000275\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Virus Eradication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2055664025000275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of acquired resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in clinical samples from treatment-experienced patients in Chile, 2012–2023
Background
Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely used in HIV treatment, yet few large-scale studies have examined acquired resistance (AR) at the population level. This study assessed the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of AR to INSTIs in Chile over a 12-year period.
Methods
We analyzed 5266 genotypic sequences from ART-experienced individuals with confirmed virological failure and INSTI-based regimens between 2012 and 2023. Resistance-associated mutations were classified using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. Resistance trends were compared between pre-pandemic (2012–2019) and post-pandemic (2020–2023) periods.
Results
High AR rates were observed for first-generation INSTIs: raltegravir (28 %) and elvitegravir (27.7 %). Lower resistance levels were found for dolutegravir (8.3 %), bictegravir (8.3 %), and cabotegravir (18.7 %). Major resistance mutations included N155H (25.2 %), Q148 H/K/R (17.2 %), and Y143R (14.3 %). Notably, Q148 H/K/R mutations were always found in combination with other major mutations. Subtype-specific differences were observed, with higher first-generation INSTI resistance in subtype F (55.6 %) than in subtype B (23.9 %). Post-pandemic resistance increased significantly for first-generation INSTIs (25 % vs. 31 %, p < 0.05). The mutation N155H, while not impacting DTG or BIC significantly, conferred intermediate resistance to CAB. CAB resistance was detected despite its absence in treatment protocols, likely due to cross-resistance pathways.
Conclusions
Acquired INSTIs resistance in Chile is high, especially for first-generation drugs. These findings highlight the need for nationwide molecular surveillance and pre-treatment genotyping, particularly before initiating long-acting regimens such as CAB-LA. Strategic monitoring will be critical to maintaining the efficacy of current and next-generation INSTIs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Virus Eradication aims to provide a specialist, open-access forum to publish work in the rapidly developing field of virus eradication. The Journal covers all human viruses, in the context of new therapeutic strategies, as well as societal eradication of viral infections with preventive interventions.
The Journal is aimed at the international community involved in the prevention and management of viral infections. It provides an academic forum for the publication of original research into viral reservoirs, viral persistence and virus eradication and ultimately development of cures.
The Journal not only publishes original research, but provides an opportunity for opinions, reviews, case studies and comments on the published literature. It focusses on evidence-based medicine as the major thrust in the successful management of viral infections.The Journal encompasses virological, immunological, epidemiological, modelling, pharmacological, pre-clinical and in vitro, as well as clinical, data including but not limited to drugs, immunotherapy and gene therapy. It is an important source of information on the development of vaccine programs and preventative measures aimed at virus eradication.