在阴离子交换树脂膜萃取土壤中占水可萃取有机磷的比例

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Suwei Xu , Andrew J. Margenot
{"title":"在阴离子交换树脂膜萃取土壤中占水可萃取有机磷的比例","authors":"Suwei Xu ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of P<sub>o</sub> species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, (2) evaluated the extent of P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H<sub>2</sub>O, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, or NaHCO<sub>3</sub> solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis and (b) accounts for P<sub>o</sub> retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble P<sub>o</sub> species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub>) cannot be assumed to represent the H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM extractable P<sub>o</sub> (AEM-P<sub>o</sub>) provided a more representative estimate of H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>. Hydrolysis of P<sub>o</sub> species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-P<sub>o</sub> was greater for NaHCO<sub>3</sub> than for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> for model P<sub>o</sub> species and or soils of varying total P<sub>o</sub> concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub> alone to estimate H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>, illustrate how eluent choice affects P<sub>o</sub> quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM-P<sub>o</sub> fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> by AEM-based methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 117505"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for water-extractable organic phosphorus in the anion-exchange resin membrane extractions of soils\",\"authors\":\"Suwei Xu ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of P<sub>o</sub> species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, (2) evaluated the extent of P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H<sub>2</sub>O, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, or NaHCO<sub>3</sub> solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis and (b) accounts for P<sub>o</sub> retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble P<sub>o</sub> species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub>) cannot be assumed to represent the H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM extractable P<sub>o</sub> (AEM-P<sub>o</sub>) provided a more representative estimate of H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>. Hydrolysis of P<sub>o</sub> species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-P<sub>o</sub> was greater for NaHCO<sub>3</sub> than for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> for model P<sub>o</sub> species and or soils of varying total P<sub>o</sub> concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub> alone to estimate H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>, illustrate how eluent choice affects P<sub>o</sub> quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM-P<sub>o</sub> fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> by AEM-based methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"462 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003465\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阴离子交换膜(AEM)萃取法被广泛用于评估不稳定的(a)生物土壤磷(P)库,但AEM萃取法量化水可萃取有机P (H2O-Po)的潜力尚不清楚。我们(1)量化了AEM提取和随后用H2SO4和NaHCO3洗脱时Po的回收率,(2)评估了(a)溶解在H2O、H2SO4或NaHCO3溶液中以及(b)从AEM中洗脱时Po的水解程度,(3)评估了一种测量AEM萃取物中Po -Po分数的方法,该方法(a)最大限度地减少了Po的水解,(b)考虑了Po在AEM上的保留。AEM提取了29 - 99%的水溶性Po,这意味着AEM去除后剩余的总P (h2矿石- pt)不能被认为代表H2O-Po馏分。在美国农业部12个订单的24个土壤中,将H2O-Po和AEM可提取Po (AEM-Po)结合使用可以更有代表性地估计H2O-Po。在提取(16小时)和洗脱(3小时)后,Po物质的水解可以忽略不计,但在24°C下,葡萄糖-6磷酸(G6P),腺苷-5 ' -单磷酸(AMP)和磷酸胆碱在18个月后的水解率高达40%。在模型Po种类和总Po浓度不同的土壤中,NaHCO3对AEM-Po的洗脱效率大于H2SO4。这些发现阐明了单独使用H2Ore-Pt来估计H2O-Po的局限性,说明了洗脱液的选择如何影响通过水解来定量Po,并证明了在使用基于aem的方法定量土壤不稳定的Pi和Po时,需要将H2Ore-Po和AEM-Po组分结合进行当日分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting for water-extractable organic phosphorus in the anion-exchange resin membrane extractions of soils
Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H2O-Po) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of Po species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H2SO4 and NaHCO3, (2) evaluated the extent of Po hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H2O, H2SO4, or NaHCO3 solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H2O-Po fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes Po hydrolysis and (b) accounts for Po retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble Po species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H2Ore-Pt) cannot be assumed to represent the H2O-Po fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H2Ore-Po and AEM extractable Po (AEM-Po) provided a more representative estimate of H2O-Po. Hydrolysis of Po species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-Po was greater for NaHCO3 than for H2SO4 for model Po species and or soils of varying total Po concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H2Ore-Pt alone to estimate H2O-Po, illustrate how eluent choice affects Po quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H2Ore-Po and AEM-Po fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile Pi and Po by AEM-based methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信