{"title":"在阴离子交换树脂膜萃取土壤中占水可萃取有机磷的比例","authors":"Suwei Xu , Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of P<sub>o</sub> species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, (2) evaluated the extent of P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H<sub>2</sub>O, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, or NaHCO<sub>3</sub> solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis and (b) accounts for P<sub>o</sub> retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble P<sub>o</sub> species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub>) cannot be assumed to represent the H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM extractable P<sub>o</sub> (AEM-P<sub>o</sub>) provided a more representative estimate of H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>. Hydrolysis of P<sub>o</sub> species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-P<sub>o</sub> was greater for NaHCO<sub>3</sub> than for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> for model P<sub>o</sub> species and or soils of varying total P<sub>o</sub> concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub> alone to estimate H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>, illustrate how eluent choice affects P<sub>o</sub> quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM-P<sub>o</sub> fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> by AEM-based methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"462 ","pages":"Article 117505"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for water-extractable organic phosphorus in the anion-exchange resin membrane extractions of soils\",\"authors\":\"Suwei Xu , Andrew J. Margenot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of P<sub>o</sub> species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, (2) evaluated the extent of P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H<sub>2</sub>O, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, or NaHCO<sub>3</sub> solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes P<sub>o</sub> hydrolysis and (b) accounts for P<sub>o</sub> retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble P<sub>o</sub> species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub>) cannot be assumed to represent the H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub> fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM extractable P<sub>o</sub> (AEM-P<sub>o</sub>) provided a more representative estimate of H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>. Hydrolysis of P<sub>o</sub> species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-P<sub>o</sub> was greater for NaHCO<sub>3</sub> than for H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> for model P<sub>o</sub> species and or soils of varying total P<sub>o</sub> concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>t</sub> alone to estimate H<sub>2</sub>O-P<sub>o</sub>, illustrate how eluent choice affects P<sub>o</sub> quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>re</sub>-P<sub>o</sub> and AEM-P<sub>o</sub> fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> by AEM-based methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoderma\",\"volume\":\"462 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoderma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003465\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125003465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accounting for water-extractable organic phosphorus in the anion-exchange resin membrane extractions of soils
Anion-exchange membrane (AEM) extraction is widely used to assess labile (a)biotic soil phosphorus (P) pools, but the potential of AEM extraction to quantify water-extractable organic P (H2O-Po) remains unclear. We (1) quantified the recovery efficiency of Po species during AEM extraction and subsequent elution by H2SO4 and NaHCO3, (2) evaluated the extent of Po hydrolysis when (a) dissolved in H2O, H2SO4, or NaHCO3 solutions and (b) eluted from AEM, and (3) evaluated an approach to measure H2O-Po fraction in AEM extractions that (a) minimizes Po hydrolysis and (b) accounts for Po retention on AEM. The AEM extracted 29–99 % of water-soluble Po species, meaning that total P remaining after AEM removal (H2Ore-Pt) cannot be assumed to represent the H2O-Po fraction. In 24 soils spanning 12 USDA orders, combining H2Ore-Po and AEM extractable Po (AEM-Po) provided a more representative estimate of H2O-Po. Hydrolysis of Po species immediately following extraction (16 h) and elution (3 h) was negligible, but increased by up to 40 % after 18 mo at 24 °C for glucose-6 phosphate (G6P), adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and phosphocholine. Elution efficiency of AEM-Po was greater for NaHCO3 than for H2SO4 for model Po species and or soils of varying total Po concentration. These findings clarify the limitations of using H2Ore-Pt alone to estimate H2O-Po, illustrate how eluent choice affects Po quantification via hydrolysis, and demonstrate that same-day analysis, along with combining H2Ore-Po and AEM-Po fractions, is needed when quantifying soil labile Pi and Po by AEM-based methods.
期刊介绍:
Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.