{"title":"基于驾驶权限博弈的智能汽车横向和纵向人机协同驾驶","authors":"Bin Tang, Jufang Yao, Haobin Jiang, Wei Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral and longitudinal human–machine co-driving of intelligent vehicle based on driving authorities game\",\"authors\":\"Bin Tang, Jufang Yao, Haobin Jiang, Wei Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lateral and longitudinal human–machine co-driving of intelligent vehicle based on driving authorities game
Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology.
The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including:
-Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing)
-Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences)
-Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)