基于驾驶权限博弈的智能汽车横向和纵向人机协同驾驶

IF 5.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bin Tang, Jufang Yao, Haobin Jiang, Wei Mi
{"title":"基于驾驶权限博弈的智能汽车横向和纵向人机协同驾驶","authors":"Bin Tang,&nbsp;Jufang Yao,&nbsp;Haobin Jiang,&nbsp;Wei Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral and longitudinal human–machine co-driving of intelligent vehicle based on driving authorities game\",\"authors\":\"Bin Tang,&nbsp;Jufang Yao,&nbsp;Haobin Jiang,&nbsp;Wei Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于目前自动驾驶技术的局限性,人机协同驾驶被视为一种可行且实用的中间解决方案,可以弥合辅助驾驶与全自动驾驶之间的差距。为了解决横向和纵向驾驶权限分配以及驾驶员与自动驾驶系统之间的互动问题,本文提出了一种在决策和控制层面都能运行的游戏共享控制策略。在决策层面,采用基于议价博弈的方法对横向和纵向驱动权限进行动态分配,并根据利益函数对分配进行调整。在控制层面,开发了一个基于扩展博弈的横向控制器,通过结合驾驶员的输入和参考跟踪命令来计算最优控制策略。该控制器平滑地结合了驾驶员和自动系统的控制输入,以确保车辆的稳定性并最大限度地减少人机冲突。仿真结果表明,在双变道场景下,与模糊权限分配方法相比,所提出的策略可将横摆角速度、横向速度和横向偏差分别降低0.35 rad/s、0.6 m/s和0.6 m。此外,在转弯条件下,横向偏差减少了0.7 m。最后,通过实验验证了所提出的人机协同驱动控制策略。结果表明,该策略不仅提高了轨迹跟踪精度,而且提高了车辆的稳定性。此外,通过比较所提出的策略与模糊策略之间的横向和纵向权限分配,可以看出该方法显著缓解了人机冲突,特别是通过减少频繁的权限转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral and longitudinal human–machine co-driving of intelligent vehicle based on driving authorities game
Due to the current limitations of autonomous driving technology, human–machine co-driving is viewed as a viable and practical intermediary solution to bridge the gap between assisted driving and fully automated driving. To address challenges related to the allocation of lateral and longitudinal driving authority, as well as the interaction between the driver and the autonomous system, this paper proposes a game-sharing control strategy that operates at both the decision-making and control levels. At the decision level, a bargaining game-based approach is employed to allocate lateral and longitudinal driving authority dynamically, adjusting the distribution in accordance with a benefit function. At the control level, a lateral controller based on an extended game is developed to compute the optimal control manoeuvres by combining the driver’s inputs and reference tracking commands. This controller smoothly combines control inputs from both the driver and the automated system to ensure vehicle stability and minimize human–machine conflict. Simulation results show that, under a double lane-change scenario, the proposed strategy reduces yaw rate, lateral velocity, and lateral deviation by 0.35 rad/s, 0.6 m/s, and 0.6 m, respectively, compared with the fuzzy authority allocation method. Additionally, under cornering conditions, lateral deviation is reduced by 0.7 m. Finally, the proposed human–machine co-driving control strategy is verified by the experiment. The results indicate that the proposed strategy not only enhances trajectory tracking accuracy but also improves vehicle stability. Furthermore, by comparing the lateral and longitudinal authority allocation between the proposed and fuzzy strategies, it is evident that the approach significantly alleviates human–machine conflict, especially by reducing the frequent transfer of authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech Materials Science-Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology. The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including: -Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing) -Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences) -Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信