首先比较氢燃料站和燃料电池电动汽车的颗粒采样和定量

Samuel Bates , Ziyin Chen , James Olden , Ward Storms , Delwar Hussain , Thomas Bacquart
{"title":"首先比较氢燃料站和燃料电池电动汽车的颗粒采样和定量","authors":"Samuel Bates ,&nbsp;Ziyin Chen ,&nbsp;James Olden ,&nbsp;Ward Storms ,&nbsp;Delwar Hussain ,&nbsp;Thomas Bacquart","doi":"10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrogen fuel is foreseen as part of the energy transition towards green future. As part of hydrogen fuel quality, particulate mass fraction is essential to be monitored and maintained at a low level (&lt;1 mg/kg). Particulate sampling has only been realised from the nozzle of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) in a limited occasion. Evaluating the presence of particulate within the fuel tank of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) provides an alternative approach to monitor particulate mass fraction and gain insights especially to link FCEV performance with particulate mass fraction. Within this activity, particulate mass determination from FCEV was compared with reference measurement of particulate from HRS. Two sampling systems, HYDAC and NPL low pressure particulate sampling system, measured particulate mass fraction in hydrogen fuel in almost repeatable condition before refueling of the FCEV and during the venting of the FCEV fuel tank. Both hydrogen fuel samples have particulate concentration below calculated limit of detection (LOD). This study provided the 1st agreement between the two strategies. Furthermore, realisation of these sampling methodologies reveals challenges for the standardization of particulate measurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100897,"journal":{"name":"Measurement: Energy","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First comparison of particulate sampling and quantification from a hydrogen refueling station and fuel cell electric vehicle\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Bates ,&nbsp;Ziyin Chen ,&nbsp;James Olden ,&nbsp;Ward Storms ,&nbsp;Delwar Hussain ,&nbsp;Thomas Bacquart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meaene.2025.100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydrogen fuel is foreseen as part of the energy transition towards green future. As part of hydrogen fuel quality, particulate mass fraction is essential to be monitored and maintained at a low level (&lt;1 mg/kg). Particulate sampling has only been realised from the nozzle of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) in a limited occasion. Evaluating the presence of particulate within the fuel tank of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) provides an alternative approach to monitor particulate mass fraction and gain insights especially to link FCEV performance with particulate mass fraction. Within this activity, particulate mass determination from FCEV was compared with reference measurement of particulate from HRS. Two sampling systems, HYDAC and NPL low pressure particulate sampling system, measured particulate mass fraction in hydrogen fuel in almost repeatable condition before refueling of the FCEV and during the venting of the FCEV fuel tank. Both hydrogen fuel samples have particulate concentration below calculated limit of detection (LOD). This study provided the 1st agreement between the two strategies. Furthermore, realisation of these sampling methodologies reveals challenges for the standardization of particulate measurement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement: Energy\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement: Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950345025000326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950345025000326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氢燃料被预见为向绿色未来能源转型的一部分。作为氢燃料质量的一部分,颗粒质量分数必须被监测并保持在较低的水平(1mg /kg)。颗粒取样仅在有限的情况下从加氢站(HRSs)的喷嘴中实现。评估燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)油箱内颗粒的存在,为监测颗粒质量分数提供了另一种方法,并获得了关于FCEV性能与颗粒质量分数之间关系的见解。在此活动中,FCEV的颗粒质量测定结果与HRS的参考测量结果进行了比较。两个采样系统,HYDAC和NPL低压颗粒采样系统,在FCEV加油前和FCEV燃料箱排气过程中,在几乎可重复的条件下测量氢燃料中的颗粒质量分数。两种氢燃料样品的颗粒浓度均低于计算检测限(LOD)。本研究提供了两种策略之间的第一个一致。此外,这些采样方法的实现揭示了颗粒测量标准化的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First comparison of particulate sampling and quantification from a hydrogen refueling station and fuel cell electric vehicle
Hydrogen fuel is foreseen as part of the energy transition towards green future. As part of hydrogen fuel quality, particulate mass fraction is essential to be monitored and maintained at a low level (<1 mg/kg). Particulate sampling has only been realised from the nozzle of hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) in a limited occasion. Evaluating the presence of particulate within the fuel tank of a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) provides an alternative approach to monitor particulate mass fraction and gain insights especially to link FCEV performance with particulate mass fraction. Within this activity, particulate mass determination from FCEV was compared with reference measurement of particulate from HRS. Two sampling systems, HYDAC and NPL low pressure particulate sampling system, measured particulate mass fraction in hydrogen fuel in almost repeatable condition before refueling of the FCEV and during the venting of the FCEV fuel tank. Both hydrogen fuel samples have particulate concentration below calculated limit of detection (LOD). This study provided the 1st agreement between the two strategies. Furthermore, realisation of these sampling methodologies reveals challenges for the standardization of particulate measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信