残疾人纳入地方应急管理:来自全国应急管理人员调查的证据

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Iskender Mambetkadyrov , Qing Miao , Sandra Rothenberg , Brian Tomaszewski , James Fugate , Jason Rotoli
{"title":"残疾人纳入地方应急管理:来自全国应急管理人员调查的证据","authors":"Iskender Mambetkadyrov ,&nbsp;Qing Miao ,&nbsp;Sandra Rothenberg ,&nbsp;Brian Tomaszewski ,&nbsp;James Fugate ,&nbsp;Jason Rotoli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local emergency management agencies (EMAs) are on the front line of providing essential services to protect their communities from disasters, yet their efforts often fall short in addressing the needs of populations with disabilities (PWD). Based on a nationwide survey of county government emergency managers, this paper examines organizational practices adopted by local EMAs to advance disability inclusion, identifies barriers to their implementation, and explores whether broader disability-inclusive actions correlate with enhanced deaf/hard of hearing (DHH)-specific services. We find that local EMAs report more commonly engaging in inclusion practices for PWD that align with existing planning and collaboration practices such as incorporating disability considerations into emergency planning and assessments, while other practices are largely not implemented, in part because of financial and staffing limitations. We also find that these disability-inclusive actions taken by local EMAs are strongly positively correlated with increased variety and accessibility of DHH services. Many of these DHH services focus on communication, of which there was reliance on a few common practices such as using written language. Given the range of communication needs and preferences in the DHH community, these practices may not meet the needs of some DHH persons. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to advance disability inclusion and enhance emergency management outcomes for PWD, particularly DHH populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability inclusion in local emergency management: Evidence from a national survey of emergency managers\",\"authors\":\"Iskender Mambetkadyrov ,&nbsp;Qing Miao ,&nbsp;Sandra Rothenberg ,&nbsp;Brian Tomaszewski ,&nbsp;James Fugate ,&nbsp;Jason Rotoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Local emergency management agencies (EMAs) are on the front line of providing essential services to protect their communities from disasters, yet their efforts often fall short in addressing the needs of populations with disabilities (PWD). Based on a nationwide survey of county government emergency managers, this paper examines organizational practices adopted by local EMAs to advance disability inclusion, identifies barriers to their implementation, and explores whether broader disability-inclusive actions correlate with enhanced deaf/hard of hearing (DHH)-specific services. We find that local EMAs report more commonly engaging in inclusion practices for PWD that align with existing planning and collaboration practices such as incorporating disability considerations into emergency planning and assessments, while other practices are largely not implemented, in part because of financial and staffing limitations. We also find that these disability-inclusive actions taken by local EMAs are strongly positively correlated with increased variety and accessibility of DHH services. Many of these DHH services focus on communication, of which there was reliance on a few common practices such as using written language. Given the range of communication needs and preferences in the DHH community, these practices may not meet the needs of some DHH persons. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to advance disability inclusion and enhance emergency management outcomes for PWD, particularly DHH populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006326\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地方应急管理机构站在提供基本服务以保护其社区免受灾害影响的第一线,但它们的努力往往无法满足残疾人的需求。基于对全国县政府应急管理人员的调查,本文考察了地方应急管理机构为促进残疾人包容所采取的组织实践,确定了实施这些实践的障碍,并探讨了更广泛的残疾人包容行动是否与增强聋人/重听(DHH)特定服务相关。我们发现,地方环境评估机构更普遍地报告说,他们采用了与现有规划和协作做法(如将残疾因素纳入应急规划和评估)相一致的包容残疾人做法,而其他做法在很大程度上没有实施,部分原因是财政和人员配备有限。我们还发现,当地ema采取的这些残疾人包容行动与卫生保健服务的多样性和可及性的增加呈强正相关。许多DHH服务侧重于交流,其中依赖于使用书面语言等少数常见做法。鉴于DHH社区的交流需求和偏好的范围,这些做法可能无法满足某些DHH患者的需求。这些研究结果突出表明,需要制定有针对性的战略,以促进残疾包容,并加强对残疾人士,特别是DHH人群的应急管理成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability inclusion in local emergency management: Evidence from a national survey of emergency managers
Local emergency management agencies (EMAs) are on the front line of providing essential services to protect their communities from disasters, yet their efforts often fall short in addressing the needs of populations with disabilities (PWD). Based on a nationwide survey of county government emergency managers, this paper examines organizational practices adopted by local EMAs to advance disability inclusion, identifies barriers to their implementation, and explores whether broader disability-inclusive actions correlate with enhanced deaf/hard of hearing (DHH)-specific services. We find that local EMAs report more commonly engaging in inclusion practices for PWD that align with existing planning and collaboration practices such as incorporating disability considerations into emergency planning and assessments, while other practices are largely not implemented, in part because of financial and staffing limitations. We also find that these disability-inclusive actions taken by local EMAs are strongly positively correlated with increased variety and accessibility of DHH services. Many of these DHH services focus on communication, of which there was reliance on a few common practices such as using written language. Given the range of communication needs and preferences in the DHH community, these practices may not meet the needs of some DHH persons. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to advance disability inclusion and enhance emergency management outcomes for PWD, particularly DHH populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信