主动脉髂钙化阻碍心脏介入:血管内碎石1例

Q4 Medicine
Inderjeet Bharaj MD , Ei Ei Thwe MD , Inderbir Padda MD , Ravi Mann MD , Baljeet Uppal MD , Merick Kirshner MD
{"title":"主动脉髂钙化阻碍心脏介入:血管内碎石1例","authors":"Inderjeet Bharaj MD ,&nbsp;Ei Ei Thwe MD ,&nbsp;Inderbir Padda MD ,&nbsp;Ravi Mann MD ,&nbsp;Baljeet Uppal MD ,&nbsp;Merick Kirshner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.radcr.2025.08.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aortic calcification is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and while cases have been reported for its management, no expert consensus or guidelines currently exist. An 81-year-old male presented with recurrent falls and was diagnosed with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe aortoiliac calcifications complicated clinical decision-making, posing a challenge to large-bore sheath placement. After heart-team review, shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with bilateral 7×60 mm balloons was utilized to deliver sonic pressure waves at low inflation pressures to selectively fracture intimal and medial calcium. Improved vessel compliance facilitated Impella-assisted PCI and staged TAVR. This case demonstrates that IVL may be a viable option for aortic calcification when alternative approaches are limited. Its familiar balloon-based design and low-pressure inflation enhance its appeal. While procedural vascular risks do exist, they remain low and can be minimized with proper device sizing and technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53472,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Case Reports","volume":"20 12","pages":"Pages 6036-6041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortoiliac calcification hindering cardiac interventions: A case for intravascular lithotripsy\",\"authors\":\"Inderjeet Bharaj MD ,&nbsp;Ei Ei Thwe MD ,&nbsp;Inderbir Padda MD ,&nbsp;Ravi Mann MD ,&nbsp;Baljeet Uppal MD ,&nbsp;Merick Kirshner MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radcr.2025.08.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aortic calcification is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and while cases have been reported for its management, no expert consensus or guidelines currently exist. An 81-year-old male presented with recurrent falls and was diagnosed with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe aortoiliac calcifications complicated clinical decision-making, posing a challenge to large-bore sheath placement. After heart-team review, shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with bilateral 7×60 mm balloons was utilized to deliver sonic pressure waves at low inflation pressures to selectively fracture intimal and medial calcium. Improved vessel compliance facilitated Impella-assisted PCI and staged TAVR. This case demonstrates that IVL may be a viable option for aortic calcification when alternative approaches are limited. Its familiar balloon-based design and low-pressure inflation enhance its appeal. While procedural vascular risks do exist, they remain low and can be minimized with proper device sizing and technique.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"20 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 6036-6041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043325007861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1930043325007861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉钙化与主要不良心血管事件的风险增加有关,虽然有关于其治疗的病例报道,但目前尚无专家共识或指南。一名81岁男性患者因反复跌倒,被诊断为严重症状性主动脉狭窄(AS)和冠状动脉疾病(CAD),需要高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。严重的主动脉髂动脉钙化使临床决策复杂化,对大口径鞘置入提出了挑战。在心脏小组复查后,使用双侧7×60毫米球囊进行冲击波血管内碎石术(IVL),在低膨胀压力下传递声压波,选择性地破坏内膜和内侧钙。改善血管顺应性有助于impella辅助PCI和分期TAVR。本病例表明,当其他方法有限时,IVL可能是主动脉钙化的可行选择。它熟悉的气球设计和低压膨胀增强了它的吸引力。虽然程序性血管风险确实存在,但它们仍然很低,可以通过适当的设备尺寸和技术将其降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aortoiliac calcification hindering cardiac interventions: A case for intravascular lithotripsy
Aortic calcification is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and while cases have been reported for its management, no expert consensus or guidelines currently exist. An 81-year-old male presented with recurrent falls and was diagnosed with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe aortoiliac calcifications complicated clinical decision-making, posing a challenge to large-bore sheath placement. After heart-team review, shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with bilateral 7×60 mm balloons was utilized to deliver sonic pressure waves at low inflation pressures to selectively fracture intimal and medial calcium. Improved vessel compliance facilitated Impella-assisted PCI and staged TAVR. This case demonstrates that IVL may be a viable option for aortic calcification when alternative approaches are limited. Its familiar balloon-based design and low-pressure inflation enhance its appeal. While procedural vascular risks do exist, they remain low and can be minimized with proper device sizing and technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology Case Reports
Radiology Case Reports Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1074
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The content of this journal is exclusively case reports that feature diagnostic imaging. Categories in which case reports can be placed include the musculoskeletal system, spine, central nervous system, head and neck, cardiovascular, chest, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, multisystem, pediatric, emergency, women''s imaging, oncologic, normal variants, medical devices, foreign bodies, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, ultrasonography, imaging artifacts, forensic, anthropological, and medical-legal. Articles must be well-documented and include a review of the appropriate literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信