Michelle L. D'Antoni , Kristen Andreatta , Silvia Chang , Kirsten White , Hui Liu , Yongwu Shao , Jason T. Hindman , Laurie A. VanderVeen , Christian Callebaut
{"title":"HIV-1耐药的RNA和前病毒DNA基因分型检测在纵向和重复检测中都是可变的","authors":"Michelle L. D'Antoni , Kristen Andreatta , Silvia Chang , Kirsten White , Hui Liu , Yongwu Shao , Jason T. Hindman , Laurie A. VanderVeen , Christian Callebaut","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HIV-1 variants harboring resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) can be archived in viral reservoirs and then re-emerge. Given the dynamic properties of the latent reservoir and detection limits of genotypic assays, RAM persistence over time is incompletely understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This retrospective analysis investigated RAM detection in adults with HIV.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Genotyping of protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase from 3 bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide switch studies was included. Longitudinal analyses were performed for participants with combinations of RNA and proviral DNA genotype reports from ≥2 pre-switch timepoints. Reported RAMs assessed at 2 timepoints were categorized as 100 % or 50 % detection, and those assessed at ≥3 timepoints as persistent, lost, gained, or inconsistent detection. From each whole blood sample, reproducibility (%) of proviral RAM reporting was the number of times the mutation was detected per number of assays run (2–4 replicates).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 223 participants, of 262 RAMs tracked longitudinally over 2 timepoints, 39 % (103/262) had 100 % detection and 61 % (159/262) had 50 % detection, with 64 % (101/159) detected at timepoint 2. In 25 participants with ≥3 timepoints, detection of 57 RAMs was categorized as persistent (19 %; 11/57), lost (12 %; 7/57), gained (26 %; 15/57), or inconsistent (42 %; 24/57). Mean (standard deviation) reproducibility of proviral RAM detection at 1 timepoint was 80.9 % (27.2 %) (336 RAMs from 70 participants).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No consistent pattern of longitudinal RAM detection was observed. Reproducibility of proviral genotyping was high but variable. Since RAMs were not always consistently detected, an individual’s cumulative resistance history should be considered for optimal treatment management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 105870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of HIV-1 drug resistance in RNA and proviral DNA genotyping is variable both longitudinally and during repeat testing\",\"authors\":\"Michelle L. D'Antoni , Kristen Andreatta , Silvia Chang , Kirsten White , Hui Liu , Yongwu Shao , Jason T. Hindman , Laurie A. VanderVeen , Christian Callebaut\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HIV-1 variants harboring resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) can be archived in viral reservoirs and then re-emerge. Given the dynamic properties of the latent reservoir and detection limits of genotypic assays, RAM persistence over time is incompletely understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This retrospective analysis investigated RAM detection in adults with HIV.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Genotyping of protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase from 3 bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide switch studies was included. Longitudinal analyses were performed for participants with combinations of RNA and proviral DNA genotype reports from ≥2 pre-switch timepoints. Reported RAMs assessed at 2 timepoints were categorized as 100 % or 50 % detection, and those assessed at ≥3 timepoints as persistent, lost, gained, or inconsistent detection. From each whole blood sample, reproducibility (%) of proviral RAM reporting was the number of times the mutation was detected per number of assays run (2–4 replicates).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 223 participants, of 262 RAMs tracked longitudinally over 2 timepoints, 39 % (103/262) had 100 % detection and 61 % (159/262) had 50 % detection, with 64 % (101/159) detected at timepoint 2. In 25 participants with ≥3 timepoints, detection of 57 RAMs was categorized as persistent (19 %; 11/57), lost (12 %; 7/57), gained (26 %; 15/57), or inconsistent (42 %; 24/57). Mean (standard deviation) reproducibility of proviral RAM detection at 1 timepoint was 80.9 % (27.2 %) (336 RAMs from 70 participants).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No consistent pattern of longitudinal RAM detection was observed. Reproducibility of proviral genotyping was high but variable. Since RAMs were not always consistently detected, an individual’s cumulative resistance history should be considered for optimal treatment management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138665322500112X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138665322500112X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection of HIV-1 drug resistance in RNA and proviral DNA genotyping is variable both longitudinally and during repeat testing
Background
HIV-1 variants harboring resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) can be archived in viral reservoirs and then re-emerge. Given the dynamic properties of the latent reservoir and detection limits of genotypic assays, RAM persistence over time is incompletely understood.
Objective
This retrospective analysis investigated RAM detection in adults with HIV.
Study design
Genotyping of protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase from 3 bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide switch studies was included. Longitudinal analyses were performed for participants with combinations of RNA and proviral DNA genotype reports from ≥2 pre-switch timepoints. Reported RAMs assessed at 2 timepoints were categorized as 100 % or 50 % detection, and those assessed at ≥3 timepoints as persistent, lost, gained, or inconsistent detection. From each whole blood sample, reproducibility (%) of proviral RAM reporting was the number of times the mutation was detected per number of assays run (2–4 replicates).
Results
In 223 participants, of 262 RAMs tracked longitudinally over 2 timepoints, 39 % (103/262) had 100 % detection and 61 % (159/262) had 50 % detection, with 64 % (101/159) detected at timepoint 2. In 25 participants with ≥3 timepoints, detection of 57 RAMs was categorized as persistent (19 %; 11/57), lost (12 %; 7/57), gained (26 %; 15/57), or inconsistent (42 %; 24/57). Mean (standard deviation) reproducibility of proviral RAM detection at 1 timepoint was 80.9 % (27.2 %) (336 RAMs from 70 participants).
Conclusions
No consistent pattern of longitudinal RAM detection was observed. Reproducibility of proviral genotyping was high but variable. Since RAMs were not always consistently detected, an individual’s cumulative resistance history should be considered for optimal treatment management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)