重复经颅磁刺激治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Bo Jiang , Chen Xue , Xian-Jun Xiao , Jia-Ming Zhang , Chen Xie , Yu-Xi Li , Dong-Ling Zhong , Zhong Zheng , Dong-Chuan Pan , Juan Li , Rong-Jiang Jin
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析","authors":"Bo Jiang ,&nbsp;Chen Xue ,&nbsp;Xian-Jun Xiao ,&nbsp;Jia-Ming Zhang ,&nbsp;Chen Xie ,&nbsp;Yu-Xi Li ,&nbsp;Dong-Ling Zhong ,&nbsp;Zhong Zheng ,&nbsp;Dong-Chuan Pan ,&nbsp;Juan Li ,&nbsp;Rong-Jiang Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic disorder characterized by uncontrollable, excessive, widespread anxiety lasting for over six months. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used in treating anxiety disorders, but previous studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for GAD and explore the optimal treatment protocol of rTMS for GAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for GAD. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Secondary outcomes included a self-rating anxiety scale, clinical global impression-severity of illness, and incidence of adverse events. Data synthesis was conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4) and Stata software (version 12.0).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 29 eligible trials were included. The rTMS combined with medication was more effective than the medication alone in alleviating symptoms of patients with GAD (mean difference [MD] = −3.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: from −4.47 to −2.28). Compared with sham-rTMS combined with medication, rTMS combined with medication exhibited a significant effect in improving symptoms of GAD (MD = −2.80, 95 % CI: from −3.71 to −1.89). No serious adverse events were reported between rTMS treatment and medication therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The rTMS could be an effective and safe treatment for patients with GAD. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity and limited number of RCTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"97 ","pages":"Pages 25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Bo Jiang ,&nbsp;Chen Xue ,&nbsp;Xian-Jun Xiao ,&nbsp;Jia-Ming Zhang ,&nbsp;Chen Xie ,&nbsp;Yu-Xi Li ,&nbsp;Dong-Ling Zhong ,&nbsp;Zhong Zheng ,&nbsp;Dong-Chuan Pan ,&nbsp;Juan Li ,&nbsp;Rong-Jiang Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.08.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic disorder characterized by uncontrollable, excessive, widespread anxiety lasting for over six months. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used in treating anxiety disorders, but previous studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for GAD and explore the optimal treatment protocol of rTMS for GAD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for GAD. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Secondary outcomes included a self-rating anxiety scale, clinical global impression-severity of illness, and incidence of adverse events. Data synthesis was conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4) and Stata software (version 12.0).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 29 eligible trials were included. The rTMS combined with medication was more effective than the medication alone in alleviating symptoms of patients with GAD (mean difference [MD] = −3.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: from −4.47 to −2.28). Compared with sham-rTMS combined with medication, rTMS combined with medication exhibited a significant effect in improving symptoms of GAD (MD = −2.80, 95 % CI: from −3.71 to −1.89). No serious adverse events were reported between rTMS treatment and medication therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The rTMS could be an effective and safe treatment for patients with GAD. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity and limited number of RCTs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001793\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是一种慢性疾病,其特征是持续6个月以上的无法控制的、过度的、广泛的焦虑。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被用于治疗焦虑症,但以往的研究结果相互矛盾。我们通过荟萃分析和试验序贯分析来探讨rTMS治疗GAD的有效性和安全性,并探索rTMS治疗GAD的最佳方案。方法系统检索8个数据库,确定rTMS治疗广泛性焦虑症的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结果是汉密尔顿焦虑量表。次要结果包括自评焦虑量表、临床总体印象-疾病严重程度和不良事件发生率。使用Review Manager (version 5.4)和Stata软件(version 12.0)进行数据综合。结果共纳入29项符合条件的试验。rTMS联合用药在缓解GAD患者症状方面比单独用药更有效(平均差[MD] =−3.38,95%可信区间[CI]:从−4.47到−2.28)。与假rTMS联合用药相比,rTMS联合用药在改善GAD症状方面表现出显著效果(MD = - 2.80, 95% CI:从- 3.71到- 1.89)。rTMS治疗与药物治疗之间无严重不良事件报告。结论rTMS是一种安全有效的治疗广泛性焦虑症的方法。然而,由于高异质性和有限数量的随机对照试验,这些发现应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic disorder characterized by uncontrollable, excessive, widespread anxiety lasting for over six months. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used in treating anxiety disorders, but previous studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rTMS for GAD and explore the optimal treatment protocol of rTMS for GAD.

Methods

Eight databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for GAD. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Secondary outcomes included a self-rating anxiety scale, clinical global impression-severity of illness, and incidence of adverse events. Data synthesis was conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4) and Stata software (version 12.0).

Results

A total of 29 eligible trials were included. The rTMS combined with medication was more effective than the medication alone in alleviating symptoms of patients with GAD (mean difference [MD] = −3.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: from −4.47 to −2.28). Compared with sham-rTMS combined with medication, rTMS combined with medication exhibited a significant effect in improving symptoms of GAD (MD = −2.80, 95 % CI: from −3.71 to −1.89). No serious adverse events were reported between rTMS treatment and medication therapy.

Conclusion

The rTMS could be an effective and safe treatment for patients with GAD. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity and limited number of RCTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信