{"title":"大数据,大偏见?影响公共交通和共享微交通一体化的因素","authors":"Yiheng Qian , Luyu Liu , Xiang Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding what drives shared micromobility use as a first-/last-mile (FM/LM) connection to transit is vital for enhancing multimodal travel. However, reliable data on transit-connecting micromobility trips are limited. Researchers often use buffer-based methods to infer FM/LM trips from large datasets, but such methods may cause bias in study results. This study uses a novel dataset with thousands of user-reported transit-connecting e-scooter trips to build a ground-truth model. Results show that more FM/LM trips are associated with higher transit-stop and road density, lower residential and intersection density, CBD proximity, greater employment rate, and lower shares of Black residents. Also, we find that using transit-connecting trips inferred from buffer-based methods unavoidably lead to biased model outputs. These biases stem from heterogeneity in station characteristics and transit-connecting trip patterns. We highlight trade-offs in inference accuracy and offer guidance for the use of big data in future research on transit and micromobility integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 104977"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big data, big bias? On factors shaping transit and shared micromobility integration\",\"authors\":\"Yiheng Qian , Luyu Liu , Xiang Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding what drives shared micromobility use as a first-/last-mile (FM/LM) connection to transit is vital for enhancing multimodal travel. However, reliable data on transit-connecting micromobility trips are limited. Researchers often use buffer-based methods to infer FM/LM trips from large datasets, but such methods may cause bias in study results. This study uses a novel dataset with thousands of user-reported transit-connecting e-scooter trips to build a ground-truth model. Results show that more FM/LM trips are associated with higher transit-stop and road density, lower residential and intersection density, CBD proximity, greater employment rate, and lower shares of Black residents. Also, we find that using transit-connecting trips inferred from buffer-based methods unavoidably lead to biased model outputs. These biases stem from heterogeneity in station characteristics and transit-connecting trip patterns. We highlight trade-offs in inference accuracy and offer guidance for the use of big data in future research on transit and micromobility integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Big data, big bias? On factors shaping transit and shared micromobility integration
Understanding what drives shared micromobility use as a first-/last-mile (FM/LM) connection to transit is vital for enhancing multimodal travel. However, reliable data on transit-connecting micromobility trips are limited. Researchers often use buffer-based methods to infer FM/LM trips from large datasets, but such methods may cause bias in study results. This study uses a novel dataset with thousands of user-reported transit-connecting e-scooter trips to build a ground-truth model. Results show that more FM/LM trips are associated with higher transit-stop and road density, lower residential and intersection density, CBD proximity, greater employment rate, and lower shares of Black residents. Also, we find that using transit-connecting trips inferred from buffer-based methods unavoidably lead to biased model outputs. These biases stem from heterogeneity in station characteristics and transit-connecting trip patterns. We highlight trade-offs in inference accuracy and offer guidance for the use of big data in future research on transit and micromobility integration.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.