Marc Schreiber , Gregor J. Jenny , Manuela Hürlimann , Yuliya Parfenova , Pius von Däniken , Mark Cieliebak
{"title":"关于机器学习(ML)在人格心理学中的应用的论述:我们能指望机器学习从具体的基于文本的数据中预测问卷得分吗?","authors":"Marc Schreiber , Gregor J. Jenny , Manuela Hürlimann , Yuliya Parfenova , Pius von Däniken , Mark Cieliebak","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores Machine Learning’s (ML) potential to predict motives and personality dispositions from text-based data, aligning with McAdams’ framework on layers of personality. ML-predicted scores demonstrated no significant advantage over a baseline model that consistently predicted the median of the motives or personality dispositions. Possible factors discussed include unmet ML algorithm requirements, unsuitability of collected texts for predicting motives and dispositions, and ML’s limitations in capturing contextualized and implicit aspects of personality. We discuss life narrative research and practice in relation to the nomothetic-idiographic debate and advocate for personality research to incorporate context-specificity and idiosyncrasy. From a social constructionist perspective, we envision future research – though not yet practice – on counselling processes delivered or supported by Generative AI (GenAI).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A discourse on the use of machine learning (ML) in personality psychology: Can we expect ML to predict questionnaire scores from idiographic text-based data?\",\"authors\":\"Marc Schreiber , Gregor J. Jenny , Manuela Hürlimann , Yuliya Parfenova , Pius von Däniken , Mark Cieliebak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores Machine Learning’s (ML) potential to predict motives and personality dispositions from text-based data, aligning with McAdams’ framework on layers of personality. ML-predicted scores demonstrated no significant advantage over a baseline model that consistently predicted the median of the motives or personality dispositions. Possible factors discussed include unmet ML algorithm requirements, unsuitability of collected texts for predicting motives and dispositions, and ML’s limitations in capturing contextualized and implicit aspects of personality. We discuss life narrative research and practice in relation to the nomothetic-idiographic debate and advocate for personality research to incorporate context-specificity and idiosyncrasy. From a social constructionist perspective, we envision future research – though not yet practice – on counselling processes delivered or supported by Generative AI (GenAI).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656625000984\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656625000984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A discourse on the use of machine learning (ML) in personality psychology: Can we expect ML to predict questionnaire scores from idiographic text-based data?
This paper explores Machine Learning’s (ML) potential to predict motives and personality dispositions from text-based data, aligning with McAdams’ framework on layers of personality. ML-predicted scores demonstrated no significant advantage over a baseline model that consistently predicted the median of the motives or personality dispositions. Possible factors discussed include unmet ML algorithm requirements, unsuitability of collected texts for predicting motives and dispositions, and ML’s limitations in capturing contextualized and implicit aspects of personality. We discuss life narrative research and practice in relation to the nomothetic-idiographic debate and advocate for personality research to incorporate context-specificity and idiosyncrasy. From a social constructionist perspective, we envision future research – though not yet practice – on counselling processes delivered or supported by Generative AI (GenAI).
期刊介绍:
Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.