竹筋混凝土板的性能评价:纤维增强混凝土与形状优化复合材料的对比研究

IF 3.9
Balamurali Kanagaraj , Arkishembha Sohliya , G. Jayakumar , N. Anand , Eva Lubloy
{"title":"竹筋混凝土板的性能评价:纤维增强混凝土与形状优化复合材料的对比研究","authors":"Balamurali Kanagaraj ,&nbsp;Arkishembha Sohliya ,&nbsp;G. Jayakumar ,&nbsp;N. Anand ,&nbsp;Eva Lubloy","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The demand for sustainable alternatives to conventional steel reinforcement in concrete remains a major challenge, particularly due to steel’s high cost, energy-intensive production, and susceptibility to corrosion in aggressive environments. While bamboo has been explored as a renewable reinforcement, its performance within advanced geopolymer matrices and optimised slab configurations remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by experimentally evaluating the structural behaviour of four types of bamboo reinforced slabs: cement concrete (BCC), geopolymer concrete (BGC), fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete (BFRGC), and topology-optimised geopolymer concrete (TBGC). The slabs were tested under uniformly distributed loading, and their compressive strength, bond performance, stiffness, ductility, deformability factor, and energy absorption capacity were assessed. Results revealed that BFRGC exhibited superior performance, achieving 13.6 % higher compressive strength, 32 % greater ductility, and 33.7 % higher energy absorption capacity compared to BGC, while BCC demonstrated the most brittle response. TBGC, although material-efficient, showed reduced stiffness (7.9 % lower than BGC) and energy absorption (24.6 % lower). These findings highlight the potential of hybrid fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete with bamboo strips to enhance load-carrying capacity and post-cracking behaviour, thereby advancing the use of natural, sustainable reinforcement in structural applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of bamboo reinforced concrete slab: A comparative study between fibre reinforced mix and shape optimised composite\",\"authors\":\"Balamurali Kanagaraj ,&nbsp;Arkishembha Sohliya ,&nbsp;G. Jayakumar ,&nbsp;N. Anand ,&nbsp;Eva Lubloy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The demand for sustainable alternatives to conventional steel reinforcement in concrete remains a major challenge, particularly due to steel’s high cost, energy-intensive production, and susceptibility to corrosion in aggressive environments. While bamboo has been explored as a renewable reinforcement, its performance within advanced geopolymer matrices and optimised slab configurations remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by experimentally evaluating the structural behaviour of four types of bamboo reinforced slabs: cement concrete (BCC), geopolymer concrete (BGC), fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete (BFRGC), and topology-optimised geopolymer concrete (TBGC). The slabs were tested under uniformly distributed loading, and their compressive strength, bond performance, stiffness, ductility, deformability factor, and energy absorption capacity were assessed. Results revealed that BFRGC exhibited superior performance, achieving 13.6 % higher compressive strength, 32 % greater ductility, and 33.7 % higher energy absorption capacity compared to BGC, while BCC demonstrated the most brittle response. TBGC, although material-efficient, showed reduced stiffness (7.9 % lower than BGC) and energy absorption (24.6 % lower). These findings highlight the potential of hybrid fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete with bamboo strips to enhance load-carrying capacity and post-cracking behaviour, thereby advancing the use of natural, sustainable reinforcement in structural applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525002076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525002076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对混凝土中传统钢筋的可持续替代品的需求仍然是一个重大挑战,特别是由于钢铁的高成本、能源密集型生产以及在恶劣环境中容易腐蚀。虽然竹子已经被作为一种可再生的加固材料进行了探索,但它在先进地聚合物基质和优化板配置中的性能仍未得到充分的探索。本研究通过实验评估水泥混凝土(BCC)、地聚合物混凝土(BGC)、纤维增强地聚合物混凝土(BFRGC)和拓扑优化地聚合物混凝土(TBGC)四种竹增强板的结构行为来解决这一差距。在均布荷载作用下进行了试验,并对其抗压强度、粘结性能、刚度、延性、变形系数和吸能能力进行了评估。结果表明,与BGC相比,BFRGC的抗压强度提高13.6% %,延性提高32% %,能量吸收能力提高33.7% %,而BCC表现出最大的脆性响应。TBGC虽然材料效率高,但刚度(比BGC低7.9% %)和能量吸收(低24.6% %)降低。这些发现突出了竹条混合纤维增强地聚合物混凝土在提高承载能力和开裂后性能方面的潜力,从而促进了在结构应用中使用自然、可持续的增强材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of bamboo reinforced concrete slab: A comparative study between fibre reinforced mix and shape optimised composite
The demand for sustainable alternatives to conventional steel reinforcement in concrete remains a major challenge, particularly due to steel’s high cost, energy-intensive production, and susceptibility to corrosion in aggressive environments. While bamboo has been explored as a renewable reinforcement, its performance within advanced geopolymer matrices and optimised slab configurations remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by experimentally evaluating the structural behaviour of four types of bamboo reinforced slabs: cement concrete (BCC), geopolymer concrete (BGC), fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete (BFRGC), and topology-optimised geopolymer concrete (TBGC). The slabs were tested under uniformly distributed loading, and their compressive strength, bond performance, stiffness, ductility, deformability factor, and energy absorption capacity were assessed. Results revealed that BFRGC exhibited superior performance, achieving 13.6 % higher compressive strength, 32 % greater ductility, and 33.7 % higher energy absorption capacity compared to BGC, while BCC demonstrated the most brittle response. TBGC, although material-efficient, showed reduced stiffness (7.9 % lower than BGC) and energy absorption (24.6 % lower). These findings highlight the potential of hybrid fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete with bamboo strips to enhance load-carrying capacity and post-cracking behaviour, thereby advancing the use of natural, sustainable reinforcement in structural applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信