持续改善的空气质量对中国成年人心理健康的影响:基于纵向观察的准实验研究

IF 6.3
Xiuling Zhao*, Weiqi Zhou* and Andreas M. Neophytou, 
{"title":"持续改善的空气质量对中国成年人心理健康的影响:基于纵向观察的准实验研究","authors":"Xiuling Zhao*,&nbsp;Weiqi Zhou* and Andreas M. Neophytou,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.5c00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) has been linked with adverse mental health outcomes. However, questions remain regarding the nature of lagged effects over time and by extension potential benefits over time of continued reduction in pollution. Here, we aim to estimate the long-term association between exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms in China utilizing longitudinal models for prolonged exposures as well as a quasi-experimental design utilizing data from 23151 participants over 4 longitudinal waves that occurred in 124 cities in China between 2011 to 2018. Mixed-effects models as well as distributed lag nonlinear mixed models were fitted to assess the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms. We also assessed the effect of the Clean Air Policy (CAP) based on a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) design. The overall average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations generally declined with time from 59.40 to 39.35 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. A 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was associated with a 0.86% increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 1.64%) in depression score based on the first three waves of data. However, the associations were sensitive to secular trends. Flexible exposure–lag–response analysis indicated a potentially influential window for lag-years 0–6. Reduction in PM<sub>2.5</sub> led to 19.51% ([CI]: 11.57%, 26.73%) and 28.18%, ([CI]: 5.87%, 45.2%) lower depressive scores in waves 3 and 4, respectively, compared to no reduction or increase in exposures. Our analysis suggests an association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms with potential long-term effects of air pollution as well as potential for continued benefit of air pollution reduction over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"3 9","pages":"1020–1030"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/envhealth.5c00033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Continuously Improved Air Quality on Mental Health: A Quasi-experimental Study Based on Longitudinal Observations for Chinese Adults\",\"authors\":\"Xiuling Zhao*,&nbsp;Weiqi Zhou* and Andreas M. Neophytou,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/envhealth.5c00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) has been linked with adverse mental health outcomes. However, questions remain regarding the nature of lagged effects over time and by extension potential benefits over time of continued reduction in pollution. Here, we aim to estimate the long-term association between exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms in China utilizing longitudinal models for prolonged exposures as well as a quasi-experimental design utilizing data from 23151 participants over 4 longitudinal waves that occurred in 124 cities in China between 2011 to 2018. Mixed-effects models as well as distributed lag nonlinear mixed models were fitted to assess the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms. We also assessed the effect of the Clean Air Policy (CAP) based on a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) design. The overall average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations generally declined with time from 59.40 to 39.35 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. A 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was associated with a 0.86% increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 1.64%) in depression score based on the first three waves of data. However, the associations were sensitive to secular trends. Flexible exposure–lag–response analysis indicated a potentially influential window for lag-years 0–6. Reduction in PM<sub>2.5</sub> led to 19.51% ([CI]: 11.57%, 26.73%) and 28.18%, ([CI]: 5.87%, 45.2%) lower depressive scores in waves 3 and 4, respectively, compared to no reduction or increase in exposures. Our analysis suggests an association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and depressive symptoms with potential long-term effects of air pollution as well as potential for continued benefit of air pollution reduction over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"1020–1030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/envhealth.5c00033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.5c00033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.5c00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期暴露于细颗粒物(PM2.5)与不良心理健康结果有关。但是,关于长期滞后效应的性质以及随着时间的推移继续减少污染的潜在好处的问题仍然存在。在这里,我们的目标是利用长期暴露的纵向模型来估计PM2.5暴露与中国抑郁症状之间的长期关联,并利用2011年至2018年在中国124个城市发生的4个纵波的23151名参与者的数据进行准实验设计。拟合混合效应模型和分布滞后非线性混合模型来评估PM2.5与抑郁症状的关系。我们还基于准实验差异中差异(DID)设计评估了清洁空气政策(CAP)的效果。PM2.5总体平均浓度从59.40 μg/m3降至39.35 μg/m3,随时间呈下降趋势。前三波数据显示,PM2.5浓度每增加10 μg/m3,抑郁评分增加0.86%(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.1, 1.64%)。然而,这些协会对长期趋势很敏感。灵活的暴露滞后反应分析表明,滞后年0-6之间存在潜在的影响窗口。与没有减少或增加暴露相比,PM2.5的减少分别导致第三和第四波抑郁评分降低19.51% ([CI]: 11.57%, 26.73%)和28.18% ([CI]: 5.87%, 45.2%)。我们的分析表明,PM2.5和抑郁症状之间存在关联,与空气污染的潜在长期影响有关,也与随着时间的推移减少空气污染的潜在持续益处有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Continuously Improved Air Quality on Mental Health: A Quasi-experimental Study Based on Longitudinal Observations for Chinese Adults

Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been linked with adverse mental health outcomes. However, questions remain regarding the nature of lagged effects over time and by extension potential benefits over time of continued reduction in pollution. Here, we aim to estimate the long-term association between exposure to PM2.5 and depressive symptoms in China utilizing longitudinal models for prolonged exposures as well as a quasi-experimental design utilizing data from 23151 participants over 4 longitudinal waves that occurred in 124 cities in China between 2011 to 2018. Mixed-effects models as well as distributed lag nonlinear mixed models were fitted to assess the relationship between PM2.5 and depressive symptoms. We also assessed the effect of the Clean Air Policy (CAP) based on a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences (DID) design. The overall average PM2.5 concentrations generally declined with time from 59.40 to 39.35 μg/m3. A 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration was associated with a 0.86% increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 1.64%) in depression score based on the first three waves of data. However, the associations were sensitive to secular trends. Flexible exposure–lag–response analysis indicated a potentially influential window for lag-years 0–6. Reduction in PM2.5 led to 19.51% ([CI]: 11.57%, 26.73%) and 28.18%, ([CI]: 5.87%, 45.2%) lower depressive scores in waves 3 and 4, respectively, compared to no reduction or increase in exposures. Our analysis suggests an association between PM2.5 and depressive symptoms with potential long-term effects of air pollution as well as potential for continued benefit of air pollution reduction over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment & Health
Environment & Health 环境科学、健康科学-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信