{"title":"ESG偏好的经济和环境影响建模:一般均衡方法","authors":"Mingke Wang, Weixian Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a multi-sector Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model encompassing households, intermediate goods producers (brown and green firms), final goods producers, a central bank, and a central government. It systematically examines the dynamic transmission mechanisms through which ESG preferences influence firm-level input-output relationships and carbon emissions. The model incorporates three innovative elements: the disutility of carbon emissions on social welfare, explicit differentiation of transmission pathways between brown and green firms, and reconceptualized firm-level ESG incentives. Simulation analyses of four distinct shocks—household green investment preference, brown firm collateral ratio, emission reduction effort, and emission tax—reveal several key dynamics. Notably, while increased household green investment preference leads to a short-term decline in brown firms’ brown investment, such investment gradually recovers in the long term, and emission stocks still see a reduction. Although heightened market expectations regarding brown firms’ ESG performance can boost their output, they may weaken their motivation to reduce emissions and exacerbate pollution. Meanwhile, while enhanced emission reduction efforts improve the environment in the short term, they exert a sustained dampening effect on investment in green firms. Furthermore, emission tax increases yield long-term benefits for green firms and the environment, despite exerting persistent negative impacts on brown firms. This research establishes a dynamic analytical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impacts of ESG investment, providing significant theoretical insights for advancing sustainable finance and optimizing emission reduction policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108897"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the economic and environmental effects of ESG preferences: A general equilibrium approach\",\"authors\":\"Mingke Wang, Weixian Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study develops a multi-sector Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model encompassing households, intermediate goods producers (brown and green firms), final goods producers, a central bank, and a central government. It systematically examines the dynamic transmission mechanisms through which ESG preferences influence firm-level input-output relationships and carbon emissions. The model incorporates three innovative elements: the disutility of carbon emissions on social welfare, explicit differentiation of transmission pathways between brown and green firms, and reconceptualized firm-level ESG incentives. Simulation analyses of four distinct shocks—household green investment preference, brown firm collateral ratio, emission reduction effort, and emission tax—reveal several key dynamics. Notably, while increased household green investment preference leads to a short-term decline in brown firms’ brown investment, such investment gradually recovers in the long term, and emission stocks still see a reduction. Although heightened market expectations regarding brown firms’ ESG performance can boost their output, they may weaken their motivation to reduce emissions and exacerbate pollution. Meanwhile, while enhanced emission reduction efforts improve the environment in the short term, they exert a sustained dampening effect on investment in green firms. Furthermore, emission tax increases yield long-term benefits for green firms and the environment, despite exerting persistent negative impacts on brown firms. This research establishes a dynamic analytical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impacts of ESG investment, providing significant theoretical insights for advancing sustainable finance and optimizing emission reduction policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007248\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling the economic and environmental effects of ESG preferences: A general equilibrium approach
This study develops a multi-sector Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model encompassing households, intermediate goods producers (brown and green firms), final goods producers, a central bank, and a central government. It systematically examines the dynamic transmission mechanisms through which ESG preferences influence firm-level input-output relationships and carbon emissions. The model incorporates three innovative elements: the disutility of carbon emissions on social welfare, explicit differentiation of transmission pathways between brown and green firms, and reconceptualized firm-level ESG incentives. Simulation analyses of four distinct shocks—household green investment preference, brown firm collateral ratio, emission reduction effort, and emission tax—reveal several key dynamics. Notably, while increased household green investment preference leads to a short-term decline in brown firms’ brown investment, such investment gradually recovers in the long term, and emission stocks still see a reduction. Although heightened market expectations regarding brown firms’ ESG performance can boost their output, they may weaken their motivation to reduce emissions and exacerbate pollution. Meanwhile, while enhanced emission reduction efforts improve the environment in the short term, they exert a sustained dampening effect on investment in green firms. Furthermore, emission tax increases yield long-term benefits for green firms and the environment, despite exerting persistent negative impacts on brown firms. This research establishes a dynamic analytical framework for assessing the economic and environmental impacts of ESG investment, providing significant theoretical insights for advancing sustainable finance and optimizing emission reduction policies.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.