Hongwei Han , Taotao Chen , Feng Zhang , Haixia Liu , Yikui Bai , Daocai Chi
{"title":"稻蟹共养具有较高的碳汇和生态经济效益","authors":"Hongwei Han , Taotao Chen , Feng Zhang , Haixia Liu , Yikui Bai , Daocai Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Rice-crab coculture is a promising approach for developing eco-agriculture. However, there is limited information on the responses of net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) and eco-economic benefits to the shift from monocultures to rice-crab coculture.</div></div><div><h3>Objective or research question</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the benefits of rice-crab coculture system (RC) on carbon emission and sequestration, carbon sink strength, gross primary production, crab and grain yield and comprehensive economic income.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate three culture systems: rice monoculture system (RM), crab monoculture system (CM), and RC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that CM acted as a carbon source (NEE: 4.76–5.09 C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). The shift from CM to RC significantly raised soil carbon sequestration (0.17–1.58 C ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). RC and RM both had gross primary production, resulting in a significant carbon sink (NEE: −3.96 to −3.71 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, −3.73 to −3.57 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). RC significantly decreased cumulative NEE (3.92 %–6.17 %) and increased gross primary production (6.53 %–7.27 %). RC transformed from CM and RM significantly raised soil easily oxidized organic carbon (6.28 %–14.60 %), microbial biomass carbon (2.82 %–11.20 %), and soil dissolved organic carbon (3.47 %–7.83 %) in 2022 and 2023, thereby resulting in higher soil respiration (1.95–5.09 C ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup>). Within RC, the crab refuge area increased soil carbon sequestration and acted as a carbon source, while rice planting area acted as a carbon sink and counteracted the CO₂ emissions from the crab refuge area. Eco-economic benefit revealed that RC did not alter rice yield relative to RM, and produced 1.43–2.58 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup> higher crab yield relative to CM, the highest economic benefits (3.64–4.48 10<sup>3</sup> USD ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), and the lowest NEE-scaled income (-1.25 to −1.21 10<sup>3</sup> USD kg<sup>–1</sup>C<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) among the three treatments in both years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RC enhanced carbon fixation capacity and optimized carbon sink capacity, producing the highest economic benefits and the lowest NEE-scaled income.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>RC balanced across rice and crab yields, net income, gross primary production and soil carbon sequestration, establishing a scalable model for climate-resilient agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rice-crab coculture produces higher carbon sink and eco-economic benefits\",\"authors\":\"Hongwei Han , Taotao Chen , Feng Zhang , Haixia Liu , Yikui Bai , Daocai Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Rice-crab coculture is a promising approach for developing eco-agriculture. However, there is limited information on the responses of net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE) and eco-economic benefits to the shift from monocultures to rice-crab coculture.</div></div><div><h3>Objective or research question</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the benefits of rice-crab coculture system (RC) on carbon emission and sequestration, carbon sink strength, gross primary production, crab and grain yield and comprehensive economic income.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate three culture systems: rice monoculture system (RM), crab monoculture system (CM), and RC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that CM acted as a carbon source (NEE: 4.76–5.09 C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). The shift from CM to RC significantly raised soil carbon sequestration (0.17–1.58 C ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). RC and RM both had gross primary production, resulting in a significant carbon sink (NEE: −3.96 to −3.71 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, −3.73 to −3.57 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). RC significantly decreased cumulative NEE (3.92 %–6.17 %) and increased gross primary production (6.53 %–7.27 %). RC transformed from CM and RM significantly raised soil easily oxidized organic carbon (6.28 %–14.60 %), microbial biomass carbon (2.82 %–11.20 %), and soil dissolved organic carbon (3.47 %–7.83 %) in 2022 and 2023, thereby resulting in higher soil respiration (1.95–5.09 C ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup>). Within RC, the crab refuge area increased soil carbon sequestration and acted as a carbon source, while rice planting area acted as a carbon sink and counteracted the CO₂ emissions from the crab refuge area. Eco-economic benefit revealed that RC did not alter rice yield relative to RM, and produced 1.43–2.58 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup> higher crab yield relative to CM, the highest economic benefits (3.64–4.48 10<sup>3</sup> USD ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), and the lowest NEE-scaled income (-1.25 to −1.21 10<sup>3</sup> USD kg<sup>–1</sup>C<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) among the three treatments in both years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RC enhanced carbon fixation capacity and optimized carbon sink capacity, producing the highest economic benefits and the lowest NEE-scaled income.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>RC balanced across rice and crab yields, net income, gross primary production and soil carbon sequestration, establishing a scalable model for climate-resilient agriculture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"334 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004174\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rice-crab coculture produces higher carbon sink and eco-economic benefits
Context or problem
Rice-crab coculture is a promising approach for developing eco-agriculture. However, there is limited information on the responses of net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and eco-economic benefits to the shift from monocultures to rice-crab coculture.
Objective or research question
This study aimed to determine the benefits of rice-crab coculture system (RC) on carbon emission and sequestration, carbon sink strength, gross primary production, crab and grain yield and comprehensive economic income.
Methods
A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate three culture systems: rice monoculture system (RM), crab monoculture system (CM), and RC.
Results
The results showed that CM acted as a carbon source (NEE: 4.76–5.09 C ha−1 yr−1). The shift from CM to RC significantly raised soil carbon sequestration (0.17–1.58 C ha–1 yr−1). RC and RM both had gross primary production, resulting in a significant carbon sink (NEE: −3.96 to −3.71 t C ha−1 yr−1, −3.73 to −3.57 t C ha−1 yr−1, respectively). RC significantly decreased cumulative NEE (3.92 %–6.17 %) and increased gross primary production (6.53 %–7.27 %). RC transformed from CM and RM significantly raised soil easily oxidized organic carbon (6.28 %–14.60 %), microbial biomass carbon (2.82 %–11.20 %), and soil dissolved organic carbon (3.47 %–7.83 %) in 2022 and 2023, thereby resulting in higher soil respiration (1.95–5.09 C ha–1 yr–1). Within RC, the crab refuge area increased soil carbon sequestration and acted as a carbon source, while rice planting area acted as a carbon sink and counteracted the CO₂ emissions from the crab refuge area. Eco-economic benefit revealed that RC did not alter rice yield relative to RM, and produced 1.43–2.58 kg ha–1 yr–1 higher crab yield relative to CM, the highest economic benefits (3.64–4.48 103 USD ha–1 yr−1), and the lowest NEE-scaled income (-1.25 to −1.21 103 USD kg–1C–1 yr−1) among the three treatments in both years.
Conclusions
RC enhanced carbon fixation capacity and optimized carbon sink capacity, producing the highest economic benefits and the lowest NEE-scaled income.
Implications or significance
RC balanced across rice and crab yields, net income, gross primary production and soil carbon sequestration, establishing a scalable model for climate-resilient agriculture.
期刊介绍:
Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on:
√ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels
on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems,
with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.