菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型对经皮眶下入路后瘢痕成熟的影响:一项前瞻性比较临床研究。

IF 1.8
Bhavuk Vanza, Anuj Jain, Neha Khare, Yash Merchant
{"title":"菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型对经皮眶下入路后瘢痕成熟的影响:一项前瞻性比较临床研究。","authors":"Bhavuk Vanza, Anuj Jain, Neha Khare, Yash Merchant","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01457-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of Fitzpatrick skin type on postoperative scar esthetics following infraorbital fracture reconstruction using a transcutaneous subtarsal approach, with emphasis on long-term scar maturation and patient complexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective clinical study was conducted on 27 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of infraorbital rim fractures via the subtarsal approach. Fitzpatrick skin typing was performed preoperatively and categorized into three groups: Group I (Types I-III), Group II (Types IV-V), and Group III (Type VI). Scars were evaluated at day 10, 1 month, and 12 months using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), independently rated by a blinded maxillofacial surgeon and dermatologist. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Cohen's kappa for inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 27 patients, 23 completed the 12-month follow-up. All groups demonstrated improvement in VAS scores over time; however, Groups II and III showed significantly better esthetic outcomes at 12 months (mean VAS scores: 9.81 and 9.83, respectively) compared to Group I (8.60) (p < 0.05). Group I exhibited slower scar integration and greater long-term visibility. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84). No cases of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fitzpatrick skin type significantly influences scar maturation following infraorbital surgery. Darker skin types (IV-VI) demonstrate superior esthetic outcomes. Integrating skin phototyping into preoperative assessment may guide personalized surgical planning and optimize scar-related patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Fitzpatrick skin type on Scar maturation following transcutaneous infraorbital approach: a prospective comparative clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Bhavuk Vanza, Anuj Jain, Neha Khare, Yash Merchant\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01457-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of Fitzpatrick skin type on postoperative scar esthetics following infraorbital fracture reconstruction using a transcutaneous subtarsal approach, with emphasis on long-term scar maturation and patient complexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective clinical study was conducted on 27 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of infraorbital rim fractures via the subtarsal approach. Fitzpatrick skin typing was performed preoperatively and categorized into three groups: Group I (Types I-III), Group II (Types IV-V), and Group III (Type VI). Scars were evaluated at day 10, 1 month, and 12 months using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), independently rated by a blinded maxillofacial surgeon and dermatologist. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Cohen's kappa for inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 27 patients, 23 completed the 12-month follow-up. All groups demonstrated improvement in VAS scores over time; however, Groups II and III showed significantly better esthetic outcomes at 12 months (mean VAS scores: 9.81 and 9.83, respectively) compared to Group I (8.60) (p < 0.05). Group I exhibited slower scar integration and greater long-term visibility. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84). No cases of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fitzpatrick skin type significantly influences scar maturation following infraorbital surgery. Darker skin types (IV-VI) demonstrate superior esthetic outcomes. Integrating skin phototyping into preoperative assessment may guide personalized surgical planning and optimize scar-related patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01457-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01457-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了Fitzpatrick皮肤类型对经皮跗骨下入路眶下骨折重建术后疤痕美观的影响,重点是长期疤痕成熟和患者肤色。方法:对27例经跗骨下入路行眶下缘骨折切开复位内固定的患者进行前瞻性临床研究。术前进行Fitzpatrick皮肤分型,分为三组:I组(I-III型)、II组(IV-V型)和III组(VI型)。疤痕在第10天、第1个月和第12个月使用10分视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估,由盲法颌面外科医生和皮肤科医生独立评定。统计分析包括Wilcoxon sign -rank检验、Kruskal-Wallis H检验和Cohen’s kappa信度检验。结果:27例患者中,23例完成了12个月的随访。随着时间的推移,各组VAS评分均有所改善;然而,与I组(8.60)相比,II组和III组在12个月时的美学结果明显更好(平均VAS评分分别为9.81和9.83)(p结论:Fitzpatrick皮肤类型显著影响眶下手术后疤痕成熟。深色皮肤类型(IV-VI)表现出更好的审美效果。将皮肤照相分型纳入术前评估可以指导个性化的手术计划,并优化疤痕相关的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Fitzpatrick skin type on Scar maturation following transcutaneous infraorbital approach: a prospective comparative clinical study.

Background: This study evaluated the impact of Fitzpatrick skin type on postoperative scar esthetics following infraorbital fracture reconstruction using a transcutaneous subtarsal approach, with emphasis on long-term scar maturation and patient complexion.

Methods: A prospective clinical study was conducted on 27 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of infraorbital rim fractures via the subtarsal approach. Fitzpatrick skin typing was performed preoperatively and categorized into three groups: Group I (Types I-III), Group II (Types IV-V), and Group III (Type VI). Scars were evaluated at day 10, 1 month, and 12 months using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), independently rated by a blinded maxillofacial surgeon and dermatologist. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Cohen's kappa for inter-rater reliability.

Results: Out of 27 patients, 23 completed the 12-month follow-up. All groups demonstrated improvement in VAS scores over time; however, Groups II and III showed significantly better esthetic outcomes at 12 months (mean VAS scores: 9.81 and 9.83, respectively) compared to Group I (8.60) (p < 0.05). Group I exhibited slower scar integration and greater long-term visibility. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.84). No cases of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation were observed.

Conclusion: Fitzpatrick skin type significantly influences scar maturation following infraorbital surgery. Darker skin types (IV-VI) demonstrate superior esthetic outcomes. Integrating skin phototyping into preoperative assessment may guide personalized surgical planning and optimize scar-related patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信