超声探头高水平消毒装置在临床应用中的性能鉴定验证。

David Bellamy, Karen Vickery
{"title":"超声探头高水平消毒装置在临床应用中的性能鉴定验证。","authors":"David Bellamy, Karen Vickery","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In accordance with AS5369:2023, disinfection processes need to undergo routine performance qualification (PQ) as part of in-field validation. Automated high-level disinfection (HLD) devices therefore need to undergo PQ. Responding to reports that some ultraviolet-C (UV-C) devices used for reprocessing of ultrasound transducers were failing to achieve sporicidal efficacy during routine PQ, we evaluated the sporicidal efficacy of these devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sporicidal efficacy was assessed using commercially available stainless steel biological indicators (BIs) inoculated with 10<sup>6</sup>Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores (ATCC® 7953). BIs were clamped in top and bottom positions inside the chambers of the devices [UV-C light-emitting diode (LED), UV-C lamp and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) mist]. All three devices were in clinical use. BI test conditions included packaged, unwrapped and non-flamed as well as unwrapped and flame sterilised on the clamped coupon end. Results were evaluated on a pass (no growth) or fail (growth) basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UV-C LED device failed to inactivate spores in all tested positions and conditions (n = 18). The UV-C lamp device passed 2/6 of the unwrapped and flamed tests but failed all other tests (n = 12). The H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mist device passed all tests, inactivating spores for all conditions and chamber positions (n = 18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mist device was the only device in this study that passed all tests, demonstrating sporicidal efficacy. Both UV-C devices failed to demonstrate sporicidal efficacy in this PQ study suggesting that clinicians need to monitor UV-C devices more frequently to ensure continued efficacy and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of performance qualification of ultrasound probe high-level disinfection devices in clinical settings.\",\"authors\":\"David Bellamy, Karen Vickery\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In accordance with AS5369:2023, disinfection processes need to undergo routine performance qualification (PQ) as part of in-field validation. Automated high-level disinfection (HLD) devices therefore need to undergo PQ. Responding to reports that some ultraviolet-C (UV-C) devices used for reprocessing of ultrasound transducers were failing to achieve sporicidal efficacy during routine PQ, we evaluated the sporicidal efficacy of these devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sporicidal efficacy was assessed using commercially available stainless steel biological indicators (BIs) inoculated with 10<sup>6</sup>Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores (ATCC® 7953). BIs were clamped in top and bottom positions inside the chambers of the devices [UV-C light-emitting diode (LED), UV-C lamp and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) mist]. All three devices were in clinical use. BI test conditions included packaged, unwrapped and non-flamed as well as unwrapped and flame sterilised on the clamped coupon end. Results were evaluated on a pass (no growth) or fail (growth) basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UV-C LED device failed to inactivate spores in all tested positions and conditions (n = 18). The UV-C lamp device passed 2/6 of the unwrapped and flamed tests but failed all other tests (n = 12). The H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mist device passed all tests, inactivating spores for all conditions and chamber positions (n = 18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mist device was the only device in this study that passed all tests, demonstrating sporicidal efficacy. Both UV-C devices failed to demonstrate sporicidal efficacy in this PQ study suggesting that clinicians need to monitor UV-C devices more frequently to ensure continued efficacy and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据AS5369:2023,作为现场验证的一部分,消毒过程需要进行常规性能确认(PQ)。因此,自动高水平消毒(HLD)设备需要进行PQ。针对一些用于超声换能器再处理的紫外- c (UV-C)设备在常规PQ中未能达到杀孢效果的报道,我们评估了这些设备的杀孢效果。方法:采用市售不锈钢生物指示剂(BIs)接种106个嗜热脂肪地杆菌孢子(ATCC®7953),评估杀孢效果。BIs被夹在器件[UV-C发光二极管(LED), UV-C灯和过氧化氢(H2O2)雾剂]腔室的顶部和底部位置。这三种设备都在临床使用。BI测试条件包括包装,未包装和非火焰,以及在夹紧的券端未包装和火焰灭菌。结果以及格(无增长)或不及格(增长)为基础进行评估。结果:UV-C LED装置在所有测试位置和条件下均未能灭活孢子(n = 18)。UV-C灯装置通过了2/6的开包和燃烧测试,但其他所有测试均不通过(n = 12)。H2O2喷雾装置通过了所有测试,在所有条件和室位(n = 18)下灭活孢子。结论:H2O2喷雾装置是本研究中唯一通过各项试验的装置,具有良好的杀孢效果。在这项PQ研究中,两种UV-C装置都未能显示出杀孢效果,这表明临床医生需要更频繁地监测UV-C装置,以确保持续的疗效和患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of performance qualification of ultrasound probe high-level disinfection devices in clinical settings.

Background: In accordance with AS5369:2023, disinfection processes need to undergo routine performance qualification (PQ) as part of in-field validation. Automated high-level disinfection (HLD) devices therefore need to undergo PQ. Responding to reports that some ultraviolet-C (UV-C) devices used for reprocessing of ultrasound transducers were failing to achieve sporicidal efficacy during routine PQ, we evaluated the sporicidal efficacy of these devices.

Methods: Sporicidal efficacy was assessed using commercially available stainless steel biological indicators (BIs) inoculated with 106Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores (ATCC® 7953). BIs were clamped in top and bottom positions inside the chambers of the devices [UV-C light-emitting diode (LED), UV-C lamp and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) mist]. All three devices were in clinical use. BI test conditions included packaged, unwrapped and non-flamed as well as unwrapped and flame sterilised on the clamped coupon end. Results were evaluated on a pass (no growth) or fail (growth) basis.

Results: The UV-C LED device failed to inactivate spores in all tested positions and conditions (n = 18). The UV-C lamp device passed 2/6 of the unwrapped and flamed tests but failed all other tests (n = 12). The H2O2 mist device passed all tests, inactivating spores for all conditions and chamber positions (n = 18).

Conclusion: The H2O2 mist device was the only device in this study that passed all tests, demonstrating sporicidal efficacy. Both UV-C devices failed to demonstrate sporicidal efficacy in this PQ study suggesting that clinicians need to monitor UV-C devices more frequently to ensure continued efficacy and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信