Athanasios Gkampenis, Ioannis Koukoulithras, Marios Lampros, Panagiota Zagorianakou, Spyridon Voulgaris, George A Alexiou
{"title":"术中超声在低级别胶质瘤切除术中的有效性和诊断准确性的系统综述。","authors":"Athanasios Gkampenis, Ioannis Koukoulithras, Marios Lampros, Panagiota Zagorianakou, Spyridon Voulgaris, George A Alexiou","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01076-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in achieving gross total resections (GTR) and identifying tumor remnants in low-grade glioma (LGG) surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases until 8th August 2024 was performed to retrieve relevant studies, while reference lists were also scanned. Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included: 1 prospective randomized controlled trial, 10 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. Of these, five studies had a high risk of bias, and eight had significant concerns regarding applicability. One study provided only mean volumes of tumor remnants, while the remaining 12 studies included a total of 352 patients. Eight studies used 2D B-mode iUS, and five used 3D navigated iUS. There was considerable variability in iUS characteristics, reference methods, and outcome measures. Linear array iUS generally demonstrated superior characteristics, and 3D iUS showed promising potential. Sensitivity ranged from 21.05% to 100%, and GTR percentages varied from 10.71% to 100%, while specificity ranged from 66.67% to 100%. Data on remnant volumes were available from only three studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the available literature no safe assumptions on neither the diagnostic accuracy nor the efficacy of iUS in LGG resections can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the effectiveness and the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative ultrasound in the resection of low-grade gliomas.\",\"authors\":\"Athanasios Gkampenis, Ioannis Koukoulithras, Marios Lampros, Panagiota Zagorianakou, Spyridon Voulgaris, George A Alexiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-025-01076-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in achieving gross total resections (GTR) and identifying tumor remnants in low-grade glioma (LGG) surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases until 8th August 2024 was performed to retrieve relevant studies, while reference lists were also scanned. Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included: 1 prospective randomized controlled trial, 10 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. Of these, five studies had a high risk of bias, and eight had significant concerns regarding applicability. One study provided only mean volumes of tumor remnants, while the remaining 12 studies included a total of 352 patients. Eight studies used 2D B-mode iUS, and five used 3D navigated iUS. There was considerable variability in iUS characteristics, reference methods, and outcome measures. Linear array iUS generally demonstrated superior characteristics, and 3D iUS showed promising potential. Sensitivity ranged from 21.05% to 100%, and GTR percentages varied from 10.71% to 100%, while specificity ranged from 66.67% to 100%. Data on remnant volumes were available from only three studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the available literature no safe assumptions on neither the diagnostic accuracy nor the efficacy of iUS in LGG resections can be made.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01076-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01076-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of the effectiveness and the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative ultrasound in the resection of low-grade gliomas.
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in achieving gross total resections (GTR) and identifying tumor remnants in low-grade glioma (LGG) surgeries.
Methods: A search of Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases until 8th August 2024 was performed to retrieve relevant studies, while reference lists were also scanned. Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
Results: Thirteen studies were included: 1 prospective randomized controlled trial, 10 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. Of these, five studies had a high risk of bias, and eight had significant concerns regarding applicability. One study provided only mean volumes of tumor remnants, while the remaining 12 studies included a total of 352 patients. Eight studies used 2D B-mode iUS, and five used 3D navigated iUS. There was considerable variability in iUS characteristics, reference methods, and outcome measures. Linear array iUS generally demonstrated superior characteristics, and 3D iUS showed promising potential. Sensitivity ranged from 21.05% to 100%, and GTR percentages varied from 10.71% to 100%, while specificity ranged from 66.67% to 100%. Data on remnant volumes were available from only three studies.
Conclusions: From the available literature no safe assumptions on neither the diagnostic accuracy nor the efficacy of iUS in LGG resections can be made.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.