审视作为公共卫生危机的种族主义宣言:美国公共卫生和政府实体的内容分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Skky Martin, Roshani Dahal, Hannah Geressu, Denisha Demeritte, Chelsey Kirkland, Janette S Dill
{"title":"审视作为公共卫生危机的种族主义宣言:美国公共卫生和政府实体的内容分析。","authors":"Skky Martin, Roshani Dahal, Hannah Geressu, Denisha Demeritte, Chelsey Kirkland, Janette S Dill","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this article is to investigate health equity commitments indicated in racism as a public health crisis (RPHC) declarations. The killing of George Floyd in May 2020 sparked widespread protests and renewed conversations about health equity, social determinants of health, and ongoing harms caused by racism, resulting in hundreds of RPHC declarations made by public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a content analysis of 237 RPHC declarations (publicly available). We identified and categorized actions and strategies related to health equity across public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 5 health equity actions in declarations included providing diversity, equity, and inclusion training to staff (43%), participating in community engagement (35%), hiring, retention, and inclusion of diverse staff (31%), partnering with other organizations (31%), and advocating for policies (30%). The most common health equity strategies were Adopting a Health Equity Approach, Community Engagement, and Workforce Initiatives, while Policing and Funding are uncommon. Health equity actions and strategies varied by public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study deepens our understanding of the health equity commitments made by public health and governmental entities in effort to reduce health disparities and improve health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Declarations of Racism as a Public Health Crisis: A Content Analysis of US Public Health and Governmental Entities.\",\"authors\":\"Skky Martin, Roshani Dahal, Hannah Geressu, Denisha Demeritte, Chelsey Kirkland, Janette S Dill\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this article is to investigate health equity commitments indicated in racism as a public health crisis (RPHC) declarations. The killing of George Floyd in May 2020 sparked widespread protests and renewed conversations about health equity, social determinants of health, and ongoing harms caused by racism, resulting in hundreds of RPHC declarations made by public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a content analysis of 237 RPHC declarations (publicly available). We identified and categorized actions and strategies related to health equity across public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 5 health equity actions in declarations included providing diversity, equity, and inclusion training to staff (43%), participating in community engagement (35%), hiring, retention, and inclusion of diverse staff (31%), partnering with other organizations (31%), and advocating for policies (30%). The most common health equity strategies were Adopting a Health Equity Approach, Community Engagement, and Workforce Initiatives, while Policing and Funding are uncommon. Health equity actions and strategies varied by public health and governmental entities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study deepens our understanding of the health equity commitments made by public health and governmental entities in effort to reduce health disparities and improve health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是调查种族主义作为公共卫生危机(RPHC)宣言中所表明的卫生公平承诺。乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)于2020年5月被杀引发了广泛的抗议活动,并重新引发了关于卫生公平、健康的社会决定因素以及种族主义造成的持续危害的讨论,导致公共卫生和政府实体发布了数百项RPHC声明。方法:对237份公开的RPHC申报进行内容分析。我们确定并分类了公共卫生和政府实体之间与卫生公平相关的行动和战略。结果:宣言中排名前5位的卫生公平行动包括为员工提供多样性、公平性和包容性培训(43%),参与社区参与(35%),雇用、保留和包容不同类型的员工(31%),与其他组织合作(31%),以及倡导政策(30%)。最常见的卫生公平战略是采用卫生公平方法、社区参与和劳动力倡议,而监管和资助则不常见。卫生公平行动和战略因公共卫生和政府实体而异。结论:本研究加深了我们对公共卫生和政府实体在减少卫生差距和提高卫生公平方面的卫生公平承诺的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Declarations of Racism as a Public Health Crisis: A Content Analysis of US Public Health and Governmental Entities.

Objectives: The aim of this article is to investigate health equity commitments indicated in racism as a public health crisis (RPHC) declarations. The killing of George Floyd in May 2020 sparked widespread protests and renewed conversations about health equity, social determinants of health, and ongoing harms caused by racism, resulting in hundreds of RPHC declarations made by public health and governmental entities.

Methods: We conducted a content analysis of 237 RPHC declarations (publicly available). We identified and categorized actions and strategies related to health equity across public health and governmental entities.

Results: The top 5 health equity actions in declarations included providing diversity, equity, and inclusion training to staff (43%), participating in community engagement (35%), hiring, retention, and inclusion of diverse staff (31%), partnering with other organizations (31%), and advocating for policies (30%). The most common health equity strategies were Adopting a Health Equity Approach, Community Engagement, and Workforce Initiatives, while Policing and Funding are uncommon. Health equity actions and strategies varied by public health and governmental entities.

Conclusions: This study deepens our understanding of the health equity commitments made by public health and governmental entities in effort to reduce health disparities and improve health equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信