{"title":"分阶段手足皮瓣互惠:利用大趾甲皮瓣重建手指缺损的显微外科方案。","authors":"Wei Zhao , Guohui Yin , Linfeng Liu , Jianwen Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Finger defect reconstruction requires functional and aesthetic restoration. The great toenail flap demands advanced microsurgical skills. We propose a staged approach: initial pedicled flap coverage, followed by second-stage exchange of the great toenail flap with the finger flap, enhancing donor site repair while reducing complexity and expanding access in resource-limited settings.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Sixteen patients (2017–2024) underwent staged reconstruction: primary pedicled flap followed by great toenail flap-finger flap exchange. Outcomes included complications, functional metrics (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire [MHQ], static two-point discrimination [2-PD]), and donor foot pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Healthy sides served as controls.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At mean 12-month follow-up, reconstructed fingers showed mean static 2-PD of 5 mm and Semmes-Weinstein result of 3.67 g; MHQ averaged 89.6. Foot donor sites demonstrated mean 2-PD of 5.5 mm and VAS of 1. Complications included partial flap necrosis (1 case) and significant donor foot pain (1 case). Interphalangeal joint motion, 2-PD, and MHQ scores differed significantly from healthy sides (<em>p</em> < 0.001)..</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This staged protocol provides a safe, practical solution for finger reconstruction, particularly in settings with limited microsurgical resources. It reduces primary hospital treatment thresholds and addresses suboptimal aesthetic/functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Therapeutic</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staged hand-foot flap reciprocity: A microsurgical protocol utilizing great toenail flap for finger defect reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zhao , Guohui Yin , Linfeng Liu , Jianwen Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Finger defect reconstruction requires functional and aesthetic restoration. The great toenail flap demands advanced microsurgical skills. We propose a staged approach: initial pedicled flap coverage, followed by second-stage exchange of the great toenail flap with the finger flap, enhancing donor site repair while reducing complexity and expanding access in resource-limited settings.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Sixteen patients (2017–2024) underwent staged reconstruction: primary pedicled flap followed by great toenail flap-finger flap exchange. Outcomes included complications, functional metrics (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire [MHQ], static two-point discrimination [2-PD]), and donor foot pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Healthy sides served as controls.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At mean 12-month follow-up, reconstructed fingers showed mean static 2-PD of 5 mm and Semmes-Weinstein result of 3.67 g; MHQ averaged 89.6. Foot donor sites demonstrated mean 2-PD of 5.5 mm and VAS of 1. Complications included partial flap necrosis (1 case) and significant donor foot pain (1 case). Interphalangeal joint motion, 2-PD, and MHQ scores differed significantly from healthy sides (<em>p</em> < 0.001)..</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This staged protocol provides a safe, practical solution for finger reconstruction, particularly in settings with limited microsurgical resources. It reduces primary hospital treatment thresholds and addresses suboptimal aesthetic/functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Therapeutic</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325006035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325006035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Staged hand-foot flap reciprocity: A microsurgical protocol utilizing great toenail flap for finger defect reconstruction
Background
Finger defect reconstruction requires functional and aesthetic restoration. The great toenail flap demands advanced microsurgical skills. We propose a staged approach: initial pedicled flap coverage, followed by second-stage exchange of the great toenail flap with the finger flap, enhancing donor site repair while reducing complexity and expanding access in resource-limited settings.
Method
Sixteen patients (2017–2024) underwent staged reconstruction: primary pedicled flap followed by great toenail flap-finger flap exchange. Outcomes included complications, functional metrics (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire [MHQ], static two-point discrimination [2-PD]), and donor foot pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]). Healthy sides served as controls.
Results
At mean 12-month follow-up, reconstructed fingers showed mean static 2-PD of 5 mm and Semmes-Weinstein result of 3.67 g; MHQ averaged 89.6. Foot donor sites demonstrated mean 2-PD of 5.5 mm and VAS of 1. Complications included partial flap necrosis (1 case) and significant donor foot pain (1 case). Interphalangeal joint motion, 2-PD, and MHQ scores differed significantly from healthy sides (p < 0.001)..
Conclusion
This staged protocol provides a safe, practical solution for finger reconstruction, particularly in settings with limited microsurgical resources. It reduces primary hospital treatment thresholds and addresses suboptimal aesthetic/functional outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.