描述当地公共卫生系统中社区环境和人口健康活动的类型学。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lois Dankwa, Darrell J Gaskin, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Kelly M Bower, Jill A Marsteller
{"title":"描述当地公共卫生系统中社区环境和人口健康活动的类型学。","authors":"Lois Dankwa, Darrell J Gaskin, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Kelly M Bower, Jill A Marsteller","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a typology of approaches to population health activities that local health departments (LHDs) and their partners take to address community health needs, and identify associated contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we categorized how jurisdictions prioritize and perform 10 population health activities. With a latent class regression model (multinomial logistic regression), we examined the effect of county-level community characteristics on LHD class membership. Models include primary care provider ratio, income inequality ratio, social membership association ratio, percent non-Hispanic Black, and percent non-English speakers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Local public health delivery systems across the US.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>600 LHDs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>LHD population health approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information statistics revealed a 3-class model as most appropriate for the population health approach typology-Underutilized Network (Class 1), Community Need and Implementation-Focused (Class 2), and Health Disparities, Implementation, and Evaluation-Focused (Class 3). Roughly 41% of delivery systems fell into Class 1, 39% into Class 2, and 20% into Class 3. Class 1 health departments self-reported no/poor performance on the 10 population health activities. Class 2 health departments reported variable performance (0.30 < P(x) < 0.70). Class 3 health departments reported good/excellent performance for most activities (0.30 < P(x) < 0.75). Regression results showed the probability of a delivery system being in Class 1 was higher among counties with a larger number of social membership associations (P < .05). The probability of a Class 3 approach increased as the percent of non-Hispanic Black people in the community increases (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>20% of local public health delivery systems achieve the highest level of response to community-specific health priorities. Many jurisdictions do not perform well on population health activities that can reduce health disparities overall. Those with a network of support, but without established plans and processes tailored to community-specific health needs, struggle to prioritize and perform population health activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Typology to Describe Community Context and Population Health Activities in Local Public Health Delivery Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Lois Dankwa, Darrell J Gaskin, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Kelly M Bower, Jill A Marsteller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a typology of approaches to population health activities that local health departments (LHDs) and their partners take to address community health needs, and identify associated contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we categorized how jurisdictions prioritize and perform 10 population health activities. With a latent class regression model (multinomial logistic regression), we examined the effect of county-level community characteristics on LHD class membership. Models include primary care provider ratio, income inequality ratio, social membership association ratio, percent non-Hispanic Black, and percent non-English speakers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Local public health delivery systems across the US.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>600 LHDs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>LHD population health approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information statistics revealed a 3-class model as most appropriate for the population health approach typology-Underutilized Network (Class 1), Community Need and Implementation-Focused (Class 2), and Health Disparities, Implementation, and Evaluation-Focused (Class 3). Roughly 41% of delivery systems fell into Class 1, 39% into Class 2, and 20% into Class 3. Class 1 health departments self-reported no/poor performance on the 10 population health activities. Class 2 health departments reported variable performance (0.30 < P(x) < 0.70). Class 3 health departments reported good/excellent performance for most activities (0.30 < P(x) < 0.75). Regression results showed the probability of a delivery system being in Class 1 was higher among counties with a larger number of social membership associations (P < .05). The probability of a Class 3 approach increased as the percent of non-Hispanic Black people in the community increases (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>20% of local public health delivery systems achieve the highest level of response to community-specific health priorities. Many jurisdictions do not perform well on population health activities that can reduce health disparities overall. Those with a network of support, but without established plans and processes tailored to community-specific health needs, struggle to prioritize and perform population health activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:发展地方卫生部门(lhd)及其合作伙伴为解决社区卫生需求而采取的人口卫生活动方法的类型,并确定相关的背景因素。设计:使用潜在类别分析,我们对辖区如何优先考虑和执行10项人口健康活动进行了分类。采用潜在类别回归模型(多项逻辑回归),研究了县级社区特征对LHD类别成员的影响。模型包括初级保健提供者比例、收入不平等比例、社会成员协会比例、非西班牙裔黑人百分比和非英语人士百分比。环境:美国各地的地方公共卫生服务系统。参与者:600名lhd。主要结果测量:LHD人口健康方法。结果:信息统计揭示了最适合人口健康方法类型的3类模型:未充分利用的网络(第1类),以社区需求和实施为重点(第2类),以及以健康差距、实施和评估为重点(第3类)。大约41%的输送系统属于第1类,39%属于第2类,20%属于第3类。一级卫生部门自报在10项人口健康活动中没有或表现不佳。结论:20%的地方公共卫生服务系统对社区特定卫生重点事项的响应达到了最高水平。许多司法管辖区在可减少总体健康差距的人口健康活动方面表现不佳。那些拥有支持网络,但没有针对社区具体卫生需求的既定计划和程序的人,很难确定人口卫生活动的优先次序并开展这些活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Typology to Describe Community Context and Population Health Activities in Local Public Health Delivery Systems.

Objective: To develop a typology of approaches to population health activities that local health departments (LHDs) and their partners take to address community health needs, and identify associated contextual factors.

Design: Using latent class analysis, we categorized how jurisdictions prioritize and perform 10 population health activities. With a latent class regression model (multinomial logistic regression), we examined the effect of county-level community characteristics on LHD class membership. Models include primary care provider ratio, income inequality ratio, social membership association ratio, percent non-Hispanic Black, and percent non-English speakers.

Setting: Local public health delivery systems across the US.

Participants: 600 LHDs.

Main outcome measure: LHD population health approach.

Results: Information statistics revealed a 3-class model as most appropriate for the population health approach typology-Underutilized Network (Class 1), Community Need and Implementation-Focused (Class 2), and Health Disparities, Implementation, and Evaluation-Focused (Class 3). Roughly 41% of delivery systems fell into Class 1, 39% into Class 2, and 20% into Class 3. Class 1 health departments self-reported no/poor performance on the 10 population health activities. Class 2 health departments reported variable performance (0.30 < P(x) < 0.70). Class 3 health departments reported good/excellent performance for most activities (0.30 < P(x) < 0.75). Regression results showed the probability of a delivery system being in Class 1 was higher among counties with a larger number of social membership associations (P < .05). The probability of a Class 3 approach increased as the percent of non-Hispanic Black people in the community increases (P < .05).

Conclusions: 20% of local public health delivery systems achieve the highest level of response to community-specific health priorities. Many jurisdictions do not perform well on population health activities that can reduce health disparities overall. Those with a network of support, but without established plans and processes tailored to community-specific health needs, struggle to prioritize and perform population health activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信