初级保健市场合并对质量的影响:来自英国NHS的证据。

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yuan Lyu , Zhaocheng Zhang
{"title":"初级保健市场合并对质量的影响:来自英国NHS的证据。","authors":"Yuan Lyu ,&nbsp;Zhaocheng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary care market has experienced a growing trend of provider consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, yet the implications of this concentration remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by providing the first empirical evidence on the effects of provider mergers on quality, using evidence from the English primary care market. Examining all provider mergers from 2014 to 2018, we find that mergers improve certain aspects of clinical quality management, but they do not translate into broader population-level clinical quality gains, and patient satisfaction declines significantly. Importantly, the effects vary by merger motivation and the size of the merging parties, rather than their geographic proximity. Survival-driven mergers help sustain care quality and patient access, whereas efficiency-driven mergers lead to greater quality deterioration. Mergers between larger practices also lead to more negative outcomes than those involving smaller practices. In contrast, we find no significant difference between within-market and cross-market mergers. An exploration of the mechanism reveals that changes in market concentration do not explain the observed quality outcomes. Instead, shifts in workforce composition, driven by the underlying merger motivations, play a key role.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 103050"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of primary care market mergers on quality: Evidence from the English NHS\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Lyu ,&nbsp;Zhaocheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The primary care market has experienced a growing trend of provider consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, yet the implications of this concentration remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by providing the first empirical evidence on the effects of provider mergers on quality, using evidence from the English primary care market. Examining all provider mergers from 2014 to 2018, we find that mergers improve certain aspects of clinical quality management, but they do not translate into broader population-level clinical quality gains, and patient satisfaction declines significantly. Importantly, the effects vary by merger motivation and the size of the merging parties, rather than their geographic proximity. Survival-driven mergers help sustain care quality and patient access, whereas efficiency-driven mergers lead to greater quality deterioration. Mergers between larger practices also lead to more negative outcomes than those involving smaller practices. In contrast, we find no significant difference between within-market and cross-market mergers. An exploration of the mechanism reveals that changes in market concentration do not explain the observed quality outcomes. Instead, shifts in workforce composition, driven by the underlying merger motivations, play a key role.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级保健市场通过兼并和收购经历了供应商整合的增长趋势,但这种集中的影响尚不清楚。本研究利用来自英国初级保健市场的证据,提供了提供者合并对质量影响的第一个经验证据,从而解决了这一差距。通过对2014年至2018年所有医疗机构合并的研究,我们发现合并改善了临床质量管理的某些方面,但并没有转化为更广泛的人群水平的临床质量提高,患者满意度显著下降。重要的是,这种影响因并购动机和并购方的规模而异,而不是因其地理位置的远近而异。以生存为导向的合并有助于维持护理质量和患者可及性,而以效率为导向的合并则导致质量进一步恶化。大型实践之间的合并也比涉及较小实践的合并导致更多的负面结果。相比之下,我们发现市场内并购与跨市场并购之间没有显著差异。对机制的探索表明,市场集中度的变化并不能解释观察到的质量结果。相反,由潜在的合并动机驱动的劳动力构成变化发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of primary care market mergers on quality: Evidence from the English NHS
The primary care market has experienced a growing trend of provider consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, yet the implications of this concentration remain unclear. This study addresses this gap by providing the first empirical evidence on the effects of provider mergers on quality, using evidence from the English primary care market. Examining all provider mergers from 2014 to 2018, we find that mergers improve certain aspects of clinical quality management, but they do not translate into broader population-level clinical quality gains, and patient satisfaction declines significantly. Importantly, the effects vary by merger motivation and the size of the merging parties, rather than their geographic proximity. Survival-driven mergers help sustain care quality and patient access, whereas efficiency-driven mergers lead to greater quality deterioration. Mergers between larger practices also lead to more negative outcomes than those involving smaller practices. In contrast, we find no significant difference between within-market and cross-market mergers. An exploration of the mechanism reveals that changes in market concentration do not explain the observed quality outcomes. Instead, shifts in workforce composition, driven by the underlying merger motivations, play a key role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信