Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille
{"title":"一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机研究:在根治性前列腺切除术后的围手术期远程医疗项目中增加手术特异性模块以改善功能预后","authors":"Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille","doi":"10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as \"0 or 1 safety pad per day\" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of a surgery-specific module to a perioperative, telemedicine program for improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as \\\"0 or 1 safety pad per day\\\" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addition of a surgery-specific module to a perioperative, telemedicine program for improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study.
Background: Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as "0 or 1 safety pad per day" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.
Results: A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.
Conclusions: Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.