一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机研究:在根治性前列腺切除术后的围手术期远程医疗项目中增加手术特异性模块以改善功能预后

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille
{"title":"一项前瞻性、多中心、非随机研究:在根治性前列腺切除术后的围手术期远程医疗项目中增加手术特异性模块以改善功能预后","authors":"Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille","doi":"10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as \"0 or 1 safety pad per day\" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of a surgery-specific module to a perioperative, telemedicine program for improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Uleri, Eric Potiron, Naoufel Miaadi, Gilles Pasticier, Alberto Martini, Nordine Deffar, Nam-Son Vuong, Gilles Gourtaud, Benjamin Pradère, Lara Mroueh, Bernard Malavaud, Michaël Baboudjian, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Jean Rouffilange, Laurent Brureau, Guillaume Ploussard, Charles Dariane, Alexandre de la Taille\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as \\\"0 or 1 safety pad per day\\\" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-01026-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字化围手术期计划为克服传统康复的组织限制提供了有希望的解决方案,有可能在减少医疗负担和成本的同时提高康复率。我们的目的是评估在优化的数字围手术期程序中增加手术特定模块对改善根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后功能结果的影响。方法:这是一项多中心、前瞻性、比较、非随机试验,包括连续机器人辅助RP。干预措施是实施Betty(更好的手术)指导计划,并结合rp特异性前和康复模块的激活。主要终点是术后6周的尿失禁恢复,定义为“每天0或1块安全垫”。次要终点是中期尿失禁、术后物理治疗需求、勃起功能、并发症和再入院。结果:对照组177例,试验组156例。两组间基线和病理变量具有统计学上的可比性。患者平均年龄为65.3岁,PSA为11 ng/ml。在RP后6周,83.3%的患者接受了数字治疗,而对照组为68.4% (p = 0.002)。数字程序组术后持续失禁的物理治疗需求显著减少(27.5%,对58.8%,p结论:除了围手术期数字程序提供的好处外,增加一个术前和康复模块,包括手术特定内容,显着改善RP后的功能恢复和围手术期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of a surgery-specific module to a perioperative, telemedicine program for improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study.

Background: Digital perioperative programs offer promising solutions to overcome organizational constraints of traditional prehabilitation, potentially improving recovery while reducing healthcare burden and costs. We aimed to assess the impact of adding a surgery-specific module to an optimized digital perioperative program on improving functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods: This was a multicentre, prospective, comparative, non-randomized trial including consecutive robot-assisted RP. Intervention was the implementation of the Betty (Better Surgery) coaching program combined with the activation of a RP-specific pre- and rehabilitation module. The primary endpoint was continence recovery, defined as "0 or 1 safety pad per day" at 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints were mid-term continence, need for postoperative physiotherapy, erectile function, complications, and readmissions.

Results: A total of 177 and 156 RP cases were included in the control and experimental groups. Baseline and pathological variables were statistically comparable between groups. The mean patient age and PSA were 65.3 years and 11 ng/ml, respectively. At 6 weeks after RP, 83.3% of patients following the digital program were continent, as compared with 68.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). The need for postoperative physiotherapy for persistent incontinence was significantly reduced in the digital program group (27.5%, versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Patients who followed the digital program experienced lower complications although not statistically significant (p = 0.1), unplanned visits (p = 0.025), reoperation rates (p = 0.025), more same-day discharge surgery (p = 0.030), and higher satisfaction (9.4/10 versus 8.3/10, p < 0.001). The main limitation was the absence of randomization.

Conclusions: Besides the benefits provided by the perioperative digital program, the addition of a pre- and rehabilitation module, including surgery-specific content, significantly improved functional recovery after RP and perioperative outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信