医学本科生对医学教育中人工智能认知的定性探讨

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Thilanka Seneviratne, Kaumudee Kodikara, Isuru Abeykoon, Wathsala Palpola
{"title":"医学本科生对医学教育中人工智能认知的定性探讨","authors":"Thilanka Seneviratne, Kaumudee Kodikara, Isuru Abeykoon, Wathsala Palpola","doi":"10.2196/73798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical education by delivering tools that enhance and optimize learning. However, there is limited research on the medical students' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of AI as a learning tool, particularly in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to explore students' perceived barriers and limitations to using AI for learning as well as their expectations in terms of future use of AI in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted in September 2024, involving focus group discussions with medical students from two major universities in Sri Lanka. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes emerging from the discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight medical students participated in 5 focus group discussions. The majority of the participants were Sinhalese female students. The perceived benefits included saving time and effort and collecting and summarizing information. However, concerns and limitations centered around inaccuracies of information provided and the negative impacts on critical thinking, social interactions (peer and student teacher), and long-term retention of knowledge. Students were confused about contradictory messages received from educators regarding the use of AI for teaching and learning. However, participants showed an enthusiasm for learning more about the ethical use of AI to enhance learning and indicated that basic AI knowledge should be taught in their undergraduate program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants recognized several benefits of AI-assisted learning but also expressed concerns and limitations requiring further studies for effective integration of AI into medical education. They expressed openness and enthusiasm for using AI while demonstrating confusion and reluctance due to the perspectives and stance of educators. We recommend educating both the educators and learners on the ethical use of AI, enabling a formal integration of AI tools into medical curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e73798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Medical Undergraduates on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Qualitative Exploration.\",\"authors\":\"Thilanka Seneviratne, Kaumudee Kodikara, Isuru Abeykoon, Wathsala Palpola\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/73798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical education by delivering tools that enhance and optimize learning. However, there is limited research on the medical students' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of AI as a learning tool, particularly in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to explore students' perceived barriers and limitations to using AI for learning as well as their expectations in terms of future use of AI in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted in September 2024, involving focus group discussions with medical students from two major universities in Sri Lanka. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes emerging from the discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight medical students participated in 5 focus group discussions. The majority of the participants were Sinhalese female students. The perceived benefits included saving time and effort and collecting and summarizing information. However, concerns and limitations centered around inaccuracies of information provided and the negative impacts on critical thinking, social interactions (peer and student teacher), and long-term retention of knowledge. Students were confused about contradictory messages received from educators regarding the use of AI for teaching and learning. However, participants showed an enthusiasm for learning more about the ethical use of AI to enhance learning and indicated that basic AI knowledge should be taught in their undergraduate program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants recognized several benefits of AI-assisted learning but also expressed concerns and limitations requiring further studies for effective integration of AI into medical education. They expressed openness and enthusiasm for using AI while demonstrating confusion and reluctance due to the perspectives and stance of educators. We recommend educating both the educators and learners on the ethical use of AI, enabling a formal integration of AI tools into medical curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e73798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/73798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/73798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)通过提供增强和优化学习的工具,彻底改变了医学教育。然而,关于医学生对人工智能作为一种学习工具的有效性的看法的研究有限,特别是在斯里兰卡。目的:本研究旨在探讨学生对使用人工智能进行学习的障碍和限制,以及他们对未来在医学教育中使用人工智能的期望。方法:于2024年9月对斯里兰卡两所主要大学的医学生进行焦点小组讨论,进行探索性定性研究。反身性专题分析用于确定讨论中出现的关键主题和次级主题。结果:38名医学生参加了5次焦点小组讨论。大多数参与者是僧伽罗女学生。可感知的好处包括节省时间和精力以及收集和汇总信息。然而,关注和限制集中在所提供信息的不准确性以及对批判性思维、社会互动(同伴和学生教师)和长期知识保留的负面影响上。学生们对教育工作者关于使用人工智能进行教学的矛盾信息感到困惑。然而,参与者表现出对学习更多关于道德使用人工智能以增强学习的热情,并表示应该在他们的本科课程中教授基本的人工智能知识。结论:与会者认识到人工智能辅助学习的若干好处,但也表达了关注和局限性,需要进一步研究将人工智能有效整合到医学教育中。他们表现出对人工智能的开放和热情,同时也表现出由于教育者的观点和立场而产生的困惑和不情愿。我们建议对教育工作者和学习者进行人工智能道德使用方面的教育,使人工智能工具能够正式纳入医学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception of Medical Undergraduates on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Qualitative Exploration.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical education by delivering tools that enhance and optimize learning. However, there is limited research on the medical students' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of AI as a learning tool, particularly in Sri Lanka.

Objective: The study aimed to explore students' perceived barriers and limitations to using AI for learning as well as their expectations in terms of future use of AI in medical education.

Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted in September 2024, involving focus group discussions with medical students from two major universities in Sri Lanka. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes emerging from the discussions.

Results: Thirty-eight medical students participated in 5 focus group discussions. The majority of the participants were Sinhalese female students. The perceived benefits included saving time and effort and collecting and summarizing information. However, concerns and limitations centered around inaccuracies of information provided and the negative impacts on critical thinking, social interactions (peer and student teacher), and long-term retention of knowledge. Students were confused about contradictory messages received from educators regarding the use of AI for teaching and learning. However, participants showed an enthusiasm for learning more about the ethical use of AI to enhance learning and indicated that basic AI knowledge should be taught in their undergraduate program.

Conclusions: Participants recognized several benefits of AI-assisted learning but also expressed concerns and limitations requiring further studies for effective integration of AI into medical education. They expressed openness and enthusiasm for using AI while demonstrating confusion and reluctance due to the perspectives and stance of educators. We recommend educating both the educators and learners on the ethical use of AI, enabling a formal integration of AI tools into medical curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信