胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病的处理和结果报告:系统的文献综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ejt Verweij, Enrico Lopriore, Marie Fitzgibbon, Jenny Noack, Thomas Wilke, Wim Noel, Jeanine van Klink
{"title":"胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病的处理和结果报告:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Ejt Verweij, Enrico Lopriore, Marie Fitzgibbon, Jenny Noack, Thomas Wilke, Wim Noel, Jeanine van Klink","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02366-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic literature review aimed to identify outcomes and provide a foundation for the development of a core outcome set in HDFN applicable for use in future clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, and EconLit were searched from 2005 until 2023. Primary research studies were included. Outcomes were systematically extracted from the publications' abstract and categorized into maternal, obstetric, neonatal, long-term, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>238 included studies reported 104 different outcomes. Outcomes related to HDFN-specific treatments were the most frequently reported across studies. Long-term outcomes as well as PROs were underutilized in the screened literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This SLR showed that a substantial majority of outcomes reported in HDFN-related studies are clinically-centred. PROs and long-term outcomes beyond the neonatal phase are rarely reported in the current literature emphasizing the need to better incorporate those into future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting of management and outcomes in the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Ejt Verweij, Enrico Lopriore, Marie Fitzgibbon, Jenny Noack, Thomas Wilke, Wim Noel, Jeanine van Klink\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41372-025-02366-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic literature review aimed to identify outcomes and provide a foundation for the development of a core outcome set in HDFN applicable for use in future clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, and EconLit were searched from 2005 until 2023. Primary research studies were included. Outcomes were systematically extracted from the publications' abstract and categorized into maternal, obstetric, neonatal, long-term, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>238 included studies reported 104 different outcomes. Outcomes related to HDFN-specific treatments were the most frequently reported across studies. Long-term outcomes as well as PROs were underutilized in the screened literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This SLR showed that a substantial majority of outcomes reported in HDFN-related studies are clinically-centred. PROs and long-term outcomes beyond the neonatal phase are rarely reported in the current literature emphasizing the need to better incorporate those into future clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02366-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02366-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统文献综述旨在确定结果,并为开发适用于未来临床试验的hdf核心结果集提供基础。研究设计:检索2005年至2023年的文献数据库MEDLINE、Embase、EBM Reviews和EconLit。纳入了初步研究。结果系统地从出版物摘要中提取,并分为孕产妇、产科、新生儿、长期和患者报告的结果(PROs)。结果:238项纳入的研究报告了104种不同的结果。与hdfn特异性治疗相关的结果是所有研究中最常报道的。在筛选的文献中,长期结果和PROs未得到充分利用。结论:该SLR显示,hdfn相关研究报告的绝大多数结果都是以临床为中心的。在目前的文献中,很少报道新生儿期以后的PROs和长期结果,强调需要更好地将这些纳入未来的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reporting of management and outcomes in the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a systematic literature review.

Objective: This systematic literature review aimed to identify outcomes and provide a foundation for the development of a core outcome set in HDFN applicable for use in future clinical trials.

Study design: The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, and EconLit were searched from 2005 until 2023. Primary research studies were included. Outcomes were systematically extracted from the publications' abstract and categorized into maternal, obstetric, neonatal, long-term, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Results: 238 included studies reported 104 different outcomes. Outcomes related to HDFN-specific treatments were the most frequently reported across studies. Long-term outcomes as well as PROs were underutilized in the screened literature.

Conclusion: This SLR showed that a substantial majority of outcomes reported in HDFN-related studies are clinically-centred. PROs and long-term outcomes beyond the neonatal phase are rarely reported in the current literature emphasizing the need to better incorporate those into future clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信