{"title":"真实世界中使用生物制剂治疗系统性青少年特发性关节炎:来自日本医院索赔数据库的信息。","authors":"Takashi Funatogawa, Kazuma Mii, Saki Katayama, Yuka Aoki, Yasuaki Matsubara, Kazuki Kojima, Mariko Hoshiba","doi":"10.1093/mr/roaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Limited information is available on patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) receiving biologics in Japan. The types of biologics, treatment duration, prior and concomitant treatments, administration route (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC] injection), treatment sequence, and characteristics of patients receiving biologics were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a Japanese hospital claims database (2008-2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2000 sJIA patients in the database, 315 (15.8%) received one or more biologics. For the first biologic, the most common were anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) drugs (82.5%; tocilizumab, 82.2% [IV, 65.1%; SC, 17.1%]; others, <0.4%), followed by anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs (11.7%; adalimumab SC, 4.4%; infliximab IV, 4.1%; others, <1.6% each), canakinumab SC (3.8%), and abatacept IV or SC (1.9%). Over 53% of patients received anti-IL-6 drugs for ≥1 year. The most common csDMARDs administered prior to anti-IL-6 drugs were cyclosporine (11.9%), methotrexate (11.5%), and tacrolimus (6.2%), and those most commonly administered concomitantly with anti-IL-6 drugs were methotrexate (22.7%), cyclosporine (16.9%), and tacrolimus (11.5%). Fifty patients switched from tocilizumab IV to a second biologic (tocilizumab SC, 50.0%; canakinumab SC, 36.0%; others ≤4.0% each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study described the real-world usage of biologics for sJIA in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of biologics for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: information from a Japanese hospital claims database.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Funatogawa, Kazuma Mii, Saki Katayama, Yuka Aoki, Yasuaki Matsubara, Kazuki Kojima, Mariko Hoshiba\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roaf083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Limited information is available on patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) receiving biologics in Japan. The types of biologics, treatment duration, prior and concomitant treatments, administration route (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC] injection), treatment sequence, and characteristics of patients receiving biologics were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a Japanese hospital claims database (2008-2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2000 sJIA patients in the database, 315 (15.8%) received one or more biologics. For the first biologic, the most common were anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) drugs (82.5%; tocilizumab, 82.2% [IV, 65.1%; SC, 17.1%]; others, <0.4%), followed by anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs (11.7%; adalimumab SC, 4.4%; infliximab IV, 4.1%; others, <1.6% each), canakinumab SC (3.8%), and abatacept IV or SC (1.9%). Over 53% of patients received anti-IL-6 drugs for ≥1 year. The most common csDMARDs administered prior to anti-IL-6 drugs were cyclosporine (11.9%), methotrexate (11.5%), and tacrolimus (6.2%), and those most commonly administered concomitantly with anti-IL-6 drugs were methotrexate (22.7%), cyclosporine (16.9%), and tacrolimus (11.5%). Fifty patients switched from tocilizumab IV to a second biologic (tocilizumab SC, 50.0%; canakinumab SC, 36.0%; others ≤4.0% each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study described the real-world usage of biologics for sJIA in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf083\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roaf083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world use of biologics for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: information from a Japanese hospital claims database.
Objectives: Limited information is available on patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) receiving biologics in Japan. The types of biologics, treatment duration, prior and concomitant treatments, administration route (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC] injection), treatment sequence, and characteristics of patients receiving biologics were investigated.
Methods: We used data from a Japanese hospital claims database (2008-2024).
Results: Of the 2000 sJIA patients in the database, 315 (15.8%) received one or more biologics. For the first biologic, the most common were anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) drugs (82.5%; tocilizumab, 82.2% [IV, 65.1%; SC, 17.1%]; others, <0.4%), followed by anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs (11.7%; adalimumab SC, 4.4%; infliximab IV, 4.1%; others, <1.6% each), canakinumab SC (3.8%), and abatacept IV or SC (1.9%). Over 53% of patients received anti-IL-6 drugs for ≥1 year. The most common csDMARDs administered prior to anti-IL-6 drugs were cyclosporine (11.9%), methotrexate (11.5%), and tacrolimus (6.2%), and those most commonly administered concomitantly with anti-IL-6 drugs were methotrexate (22.7%), cyclosporine (16.9%), and tacrolimus (11.5%). Fifty patients switched from tocilizumab IV to a second biologic (tocilizumab SC, 50.0%; canakinumab SC, 36.0%; others ≤4.0% each).
Conclusions: Our study described the real-world usage of biologics for sJIA in Japan.
期刊介绍:
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions