{"title":"结直肠癌患者-照顾者二元心理困扰:影响因素及二元干预偏好-一项混合方法研究","authors":"Xiaoxiao Hu, Qiaomei Zhang, Honghong Wang, Jiping Tan, Qingchun Geng, Hongwen Ma, Yanfei Jin","doi":"10.1002/pon.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive \"mutual protection through concealment\" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Distress Among Colorectal Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Influencing Factors and Dyadic Intervention Preferences-A Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Hu, Qiaomei Zhang, Honghong Wang, Jiping Tan, Qingchun Geng, Hongwen Ma, Yanfei Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive \\\"mutual protection through concealment\\\" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"e70287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychological Distress Among Colorectal Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Influencing Factors and Dyadic Intervention Preferences-A Mixed Methods Study.
Background: Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.
Aims: To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.
Methods: A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.
Results: Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive "mutual protection through concealment" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).
Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.