结直肠癌患者-照顾者二元心理困扰:影响因素及二元干预偏好-一项混合方法研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Xiaoxiao Hu, Qiaomei Zhang, Honghong Wang, Jiping Tan, Qingchun Geng, Hongwen Ma, Yanfei Jin
{"title":"结直肠癌患者-照顾者二元心理困扰:影响因素及二元干预偏好-一项混合方法研究","authors":"Xiaoxiao Hu, Qiaomei Zhang, Honghong Wang, Jiping Tan, Qingchun Geng, Hongwen Ma, Yanfei Jin","doi":"10.1002/pon.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive \"mutual protection through concealment\" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Distress Among Colorectal Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Influencing Factors and Dyadic Intervention Preferences-A Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Hu, Qiaomei Zhang, Honghong Wang, Jiping Tan, Qingchun Geng, Hongwen Ma, Yanfei Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive \\\"mutual protection through concealment\\\" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"e70287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌给患者和配偶照顾者带来了巨大的心理困扰,但对双重困扰的相互作用、关键影响因素和有效干预措施的了解还不够充分。目的:评估结直肠癌患者-照顾者二元群体的心理困扰水平,识别影响因素,探索二元干预模式,并收集专业人士的预防和缓解策略建议。方法:采用解释性序列设计的混合方法进行研究。从数量上,来自三所三级医院的259名结直肠癌患者-护理者完成了心理困扰、感知压力、关系满意度和痛苦披露的调查。定性地,对10名患者-护理人员和10名医疗保健提供者进行深度访谈,使用最大变异抽样。结果:患者和护理人员均表现出明显的心理困扰。对患者来说,关键的预测因素包括关系满意度、痛苦披露和感知压力。对于护理人员,显著的预测因子是护理人员的年龄、护理时间、关系满意度、痛苦披露、感知压力和患者关系满意度。一种独特的“通过隐藏相互保护”的模式出现了,患者和护理人员都隐藏了痛苦,以保护彼此。定性研究结果还确定了额外的痛苦触发因素(角色变化、症状负担、长期护理)和保护因素(关系支持、接受和开放沟通)。结论:医疗保健专业人员应该通过有针对性的干预来解决结直肠癌双联体患者的心理困扰,考虑双联体的相互作用模式。干预措施应包括加强关系、沟通技巧培训、照顾者对其健康状况的支持、症状管理教育,以及解决受文化影响的相互隐瞒模式的策略,以促进真实的情绪披露,减少心理困扰,提高患者和照顾者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological Distress Among Colorectal Cancer Patient-Caregiver Dyads: Influencing Factors and Dyadic Intervention Preferences-A Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Colorectal cancer imposes substantial psychological distress on patients and spouse caregivers, yet dyadic distress interactions, key influencing factors, and effective interventions remain insufficiently understood.

Aims: To assess psychological distress levels in colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads, identify influencing factors, explore dyadic intervention patterns, and gather professional suggestions for prevention and mitigation strategies.

Methods: A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Quantitatively, 259 colorectal cancer patient-caregiver dyads from three tertiary hospitals completed surveys measuring psychological distress, perceived stress, relationship satisfaction, and distress disclosure. Qualitatively, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 10 healthcare providers using maximum variation sampling.

Results: Both patients and caregivers demonstrated significant psychological distress. For patients, key predictors included relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, and perceived stress. For caregivers, significant predictors were caregivers' age, caregiving hours, relationship satisfaction, distress disclosure, perceived stress, and patients' relationship satisfaction. A distinctive "mutual protection through concealment" pattern emerged, where both patients and caregivers concealed distress to protect each other. Qualitative findings also identified additional distress triggers (role changes, symptom burden, prolonged caregiving) and protective factors (relationship support, acceptance, and open communication).

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should address psychological distress in colorectal cancer dyads through targeted interventions, considering dyadic interaction patterns. Interventions should include relationship strengthening, communication skills training, caregiver support with attention to their health status, symptom management education, and strategies addressing the culturally influenced mutual concealment pattern to promote authentic emotional disclosure, reduce psychological distress, and improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信