Joris Guyon, Jeanne Malaubier, Hong-Van Pham, Lila Rami Arab, Laurence Pieroni, Marie-Laure Curutchet-Burtin, Rémi Segues, Sylvie Caspar-Bauguil, Annie M Bérard
{"title":"两种尿蛋白组成分析方法在肾脏疾病诊断及随访中的比较。","authors":"Joris Guyon, Jeanne Malaubier, Hong-Van Pham, Lila Rami Arab, Laurence Pieroni, Marie-Laure Curutchet-Burtin, Rémi Segues, Sylvie Caspar-Bauguil, Annie M Bérard","doi":"10.1002/elps.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proteinuria analysis is necessary to detect the early stages of kidney disease before the estimated glomerular filtration rate deteriorates and to monitor the progression of treated kidney disease. Electrophoresis is often the first orientation test, although this test is time-consuming and its interpretation may be subjective. Two types of electrophoresis gel for urinary proteins are available: (1) high-resolution (HR) agarose gel and (2) agarose gel combined with immunological detection of specific urinary proteins after their electrophoretic migration (UP). As the former is known to provide the best results for the quantification of monoclonal protein and the latter for its characterization, we only investigated methods for determining the type of kidney damage in our study. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare two strategies for proteinuria typing: UP gel to HR gel with quantification of specific proteins (albumin, eventually transferrin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and α2-macroglobulin if blood is present), and HR gel allowing the visualization of RBP, β2-microglobulin, and transferrin. The two methods were comparable in detecting abnormal excretion of tubular markers (α1-microglobulin and β2-microglobulin), nonselective glomerular markers such as IgG, and post-renal marker (α2-macroglobulin). The results differed for albumin, whose limit of detection was 25 times lower than the limit of quantification by immunoassay, leading to false positives and no differentiation between low and high excretion of albuminuria. In conclusion on UP gel, when proteinuria typing is prescribed without investigating monoclonal protein, we recommend carrying out immunoassays for specific proteins (e.g., albumin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, and IgG). In a context of associated monoclonal protein investigation, tubular and glomerular damage markers (excluding albumin) can be interpreted on a UP gel. If blood is present, α2-macroglobulin must be measured using immunoassays to determine the post-renal origin of proteinuria using the ratio α2-macroglobulin/albumin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Strategies of Analysis of Urinary Protein Composition for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Renal Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Joris Guyon, Jeanne Malaubier, Hong-Van Pham, Lila Rami Arab, Laurence Pieroni, Marie-Laure Curutchet-Burtin, Rémi Segues, Sylvie Caspar-Bauguil, Annie M Bérard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elps.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proteinuria analysis is necessary to detect the early stages of kidney disease before the estimated glomerular filtration rate deteriorates and to monitor the progression of treated kidney disease. Electrophoresis is often the first orientation test, although this test is time-consuming and its interpretation may be subjective. Two types of electrophoresis gel for urinary proteins are available: (1) high-resolution (HR) agarose gel and (2) agarose gel combined with immunological detection of specific urinary proteins after their electrophoretic migration (UP). As the former is known to provide the best results for the quantification of monoclonal protein and the latter for its characterization, we only investigated methods for determining the type of kidney damage in our study. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare two strategies for proteinuria typing: UP gel to HR gel with quantification of specific proteins (albumin, eventually transferrin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and α2-macroglobulin if blood is present), and HR gel allowing the visualization of RBP, β2-microglobulin, and transferrin. The two methods were comparable in detecting abnormal excretion of tubular markers (α1-microglobulin and β2-microglobulin), nonselective glomerular markers such as IgG, and post-renal marker (α2-macroglobulin). The results differed for albumin, whose limit of detection was 25 times lower than the limit of quantification by immunoassay, leading to false positives and no differentiation between low and high excretion of albuminuria. In conclusion on UP gel, when proteinuria typing is prescribed without investigating monoclonal protein, we recommend carrying out immunoassays for specific proteins (e.g., albumin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, and IgG). In a context of associated monoclonal protein investigation, tubular and glomerular damage markers (excluding albumin) can be interpreted on a UP gel. If blood is present, α2-macroglobulin must be measured using immunoassays to determine the post-renal origin of proteinuria using the ratio α2-macroglobulin/albumin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Two Strategies of Analysis of Urinary Protein Composition for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Renal Diseases.
Proteinuria analysis is necessary to detect the early stages of kidney disease before the estimated glomerular filtration rate deteriorates and to monitor the progression of treated kidney disease. Electrophoresis is often the first orientation test, although this test is time-consuming and its interpretation may be subjective. Two types of electrophoresis gel for urinary proteins are available: (1) high-resolution (HR) agarose gel and (2) agarose gel combined with immunological detection of specific urinary proteins after their electrophoretic migration (UP). As the former is known to provide the best results for the quantification of monoclonal protein and the latter for its characterization, we only investigated methods for determining the type of kidney damage in our study. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare two strategies for proteinuria typing: UP gel to HR gel with quantification of specific proteins (albumin, eventually transferrin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), and α2-macroglobulin if blood is present), and HR gel allowing the visualization of RBP, β2-microglobulin, and transferrin. The two methods were comparable in detecting abnormal excretion of tubular markers (α1-microglobulin and β2-microglobulin), nonselective glomerular markers such as IgG, and post-renal marker (α2-macroglobulin). The results differed for albumin, whose limit of detection was 25 times lower than the limit of quantification by immunoassay, leading to false positives and no differentiation between low and high excretion of albuminuria. In conclusion on UP gel, when proteinuria typing is prescribed without investigating monoclonal protein, we recommend carrying out immunoassays for specific proteins (e.g., albumin, α1-microglobulin, eventually β2-microglobulin, and IgG). In a context of associated monoclonal protein investigation, tubular and glomerular damage markers (excluding albumin) can be interpreted on a UP gel. If blood is present, α2-macroglobulin must be measured using immunoassays to determine the post-renal origin of proteinuria using the ratio α2-macroglobulin/albumin.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.