Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi
{"title":"使用Tox21生物测定和自监督图转换器的人工智能驱动的塑料添加剂危害优先级排序。","authors":"Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-driven hazard prioritization of plastic additives using Tox21 bioassays and self-supervised graph transformers.\",\"authors\":\"Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
AI-driven hazard prioritization of plastic additives using Tox21 bioassays and self-supervised graph transformers.
As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.