使用Tox21生物测定和自监督图转换器的人工智能驱动的塑料添加剂危害优先级排序。

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi
{"title":"使用Tox21生物测定和自监督图转换器的人工智能驱动的塑料添加剂危害优先级排序。","authors":"Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-driven hazard prioritization of plastic additives using Tox21 bioassays and self-supervised graph transformers.\",\"authors\":\"Donghyeon Kim, Eungyeong Lee, Youngmin Yi, Jinhee Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当塑料降解成微纳米级颗粒时,它们会将化学添加剂浸出到环境中,可能比聚合物基体本身产生更大的毒性。ECHA塑料添加剂倡议组织编制了一份清单,列出了400多种大量使用的塑料添加剂。本研究旨在利用Tox21生物测定和深度学习模型筛选这些化学物质的潜在毒性。为此,我们收集了Tox21数据集,该数据集提供了超过7000种化学物质在不同端点的广泛生物活性概况,包括人类核受体信号和应激反应途径。然后,我们使用Tox21生物测定的实验数据训练深度学习模型。具体来说,我们采用了GROVER算法,该算法旨在通过利用变压器和自监督预训练来克服传统图神经网络的典型局限性。我们在12个Tox21生物测定数据集上对模型进行了微调,使用F1评分作为主要评价指标。结果,GROVER模型优于基准算法,包括图卷积网络、随机森林、支持向量机和逻辑回归。使用经过微调的GROVER模型,我们在171种添加剂中确定了78种高活性化学物质。对于这些活性塑料添加剂化学品,我们还调查了来自CompTox化学仪表板的现有危害信息(最小口服出发点)以及来自PubChem DB的全球化学品统一分类和标签系统(GHS)信息。这种方法揭示了具有潜在毒性的塑料添加剂化学品的重大数据缺口,可以支持监管决策。总的来说,本研究提供了一个实际的用例,将尖端的人工智能模型作为新的方法方法(NAMs)应用于现代化的危害评估,与动物试验的3Rs(替代、减少、改进)原则保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-driven hazard prioritization of plastic additives using Tox21 bioassays and self-supervised graph transformers.

As plastics degrade into micro- and nano-sized particles, they can leach additive chemicals into the environment, potentially exerting greater toxicity than the polymer matrix itself. The ECHA Plastic Additives Initiative has compiled a list of more than 400 plastic additives that are used in high volumes. This study aimed to screen the potential toxicity of these chemicals using Tox21 bioassays and deep learning models. To this end, we collected the Tox21 dataset, which provides extensive bioactivity profiles for over 7,000 chemicals across various endpoints, including human nuclear receptor signaling and stress response pathways. We then trained deep learning models using experimental data from Tox21 bioassays. Specifically, we employed the GROVER algorithm, which was designed to overcome typical limitations of traditional graph neural networks by leveraging transformers and self-supervised pretraining. We fine-tuned the model on twelve Tox21 bioassay datasets, using the F1 score as the primary evaluation metric. As a result, the GROVER model outperformed baseline algorithms, including graph convolutional networks, random forest, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Using the fine-tuned GROVER models, we identified 78 highly active chemicals among 171 additives. For these active plastic additive chemicals, we also investigated existing hazard information (minimal oral point-of-departure) from the CompTox Chemical Dashboard and their Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) information from PubChem DB. This approach revealed significant data gaps for plastic additive chemicals with potential toxicity and can support regulatory decision-making. Collectively, this study provides a practical use case for applying cutting-edge AI models as new approach methodologies (NAMs) to modernize hazard assessment, in alignment with the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principle for animal testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信