放射科医生对人工智能和放射学未来的看法:来自美国全国调查的见解。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mohammad Alarifi
{"title":"放射科医生对人工智能和放射学未来的看法:来自美国全国调查的见解。","authors":"Mohammad Alarifi","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate U.S. radiologists' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology, identify demographic factors influencing these perceptions, and analyze the potential challenges and opportunities AI integration presents in radiological practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 322 board-certified radiologists was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and Qualtrics. The survey collected demographic data (age, gender, experience, and subspecialty) and assessed attitudes toward AI integration in radiology. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to evaluate correlations between demographic variables and perceptions of AI's impact, confidence in its role, and anticipated adoption timelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of radiologists (82.9%) indicated that AI would significantly impact radiology. Younger radiologists (<40 years) displayed higher optimism and greater familiarity with AI tools compared to their older counterparts. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between age and optimism (χ2 = 47.551, p < 0.001) and between gender and confidence in AI's role (χ2 = 21.982, p < 0.001). Subspecialty differences emerged, with 87.5% of emergency radiologists anticipating AI adoption within 3-5 years, whereas 26.3% of pediatric radiologists predicted adoption within 6-10 years. Notably, younger radiologists showed increased susceptibility to errors when evaluating misleading AI-generated outputs, underscoring the necessity for structured training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of AI in radiology holds transformative potential but poses challenges, including overreliance, varying familiarity levels, and subspecialty-specific disparities. Structured education and robust regulatory frameworks are critical to optimize AI's adoption and minimize associated risks.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study highlights significant demographic variations in radiologists' attitudes toward AI and underscores the importance of targeted training and interventions to support effective AI integration. These findings add to the existing research by emphasizing the necessity for structured AI training tailored to demographic and subspecialty needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiologists' Views on AI and the Future of Radiology: Insights from a U.S. National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Alarifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate U.S. radiologists' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology, identify demographic factors influencing these perceptions, and analyze the potential challenges and opportunities AI integration presents in radiological practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 322 board-certified radiologists was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and Qualtrics. The survey collected demographic data (age, gender, experience, and subspecialty) and assessed attitudes toward AI integration in radiology. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to evaluate correlations between demographic variables and perceptions of AI's impact, confidence in its role, and anticipated adoption timelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of radiologists (82.9%) indicated that AI would significantly impact radiology. Younger radiologists (<40 years) displayed higher optimism and greater familiarity with AI tools compared to their older counterparts. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between age and optimism (χ2 = 47.551, p < 0.001) and between gender and confidence in AI's role (χ2 = 21.982, p < 0.001). Subspecialty differences emerged, with 87.5% of emergency radiologists anticipating AI adoption within 3-5 years, whereas 26.3% of pediatric radiologists predicted adoption within 6-10 years. Notably, younger radiologists showed increased susceptibility to errors when evaluating misleading AI-generated outputs, underscoring the necessity for structured training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of AI in radiology holds transformative potential but poses challenges, including overreliance, varying familiarity levels, and subspecialty-specific disparities. Structured education and robust regulatory frameworks are critical to optimize AI's adoption and minimize associated risks.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study highlights significant demographic variations in radiologists' attitudes toward AI and underscores the importance of targeted training and interventions to support effective AI integration. These findings add to the existing research by emphasizing the necessity for structured AI training tailored to demographic and subspecialty needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf222\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估美国放射科医生对放射学中人工智能(AI)的态度,确定影响这些看法的人口统计学因素,并分析人工智能集成在放射实践中带来的潜在挑战和机遇。方法:使用Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk)和qualics对322名委员会认证的放射科医生进行横断面调查。该调查收集了人口统计数据(年龄、性别、经验和亚专业),并评估了人们对人工智能在放射学中的应用的态度。皮尔逊卡方检验用于评估人口变量与对人工智能影响的认知、对其作用的信心和预期采用时间表之间的相关性。结果:大多数放射科医师(82.9%)认为人工智能将显著影响放射学。结论:人工智能在放射学中的整合具有变革潜力,但也带来了挑战,包括过度依赖、熟悉程度不同和亚专科特异性差异。结构化的教育和健全的监管框架对于优化人工智能的采用和最小化相关风险至关重要。知识的进步:本研究强调了放射科医生对人工智能态度的显著人口差异,并强调了有针对性的培训和干预以支持有效的人工智能整合的重要性。这些发现增加了现有的研究,强调了针对人口统计学和亚专业需求进行结构化人工智能培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiologists' Views on AI and the Future of Radiology: Insights from a U.S. National Survey.

Objectives: To evaluate U.S. radiologists' attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology, identify demographic factors influencing these perceptions, and analyze the potential challenges and opportunities AI integration presents in radiological practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 322 board-certified radiologists was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and Qualtrics. The survey collected demographic data (age, gender, experience, and subspecialty) and assessed attitudes toward AI integration in radiology. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to evaluate correlations between demographic variables and perceptions of AI's impact, confidence in its role, and anticipated adoption timelines.

Results: The majority of radiologists (82.9%) indicated that AI would significantly impact radiology. Younger radiologists (<40 years) displayed higher optimism and greater familiarity with AI tools compared to their older counterparts. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between age and optimism (χ2 = 47.551, p < 0.001) and between gender and confidence in AI's role (χ2 = 21.982, p < 0.001). Subspecialty differences emerged, with 87.5% of emergency radiologists anticipating AI adoption within 3-5 years, whereas 26.3% of pediatric radiologists predicted adoption within 6-10 years. Notably, younger radiologists showed increased susceptibility to errors when evaluating misleading AI-generated outputs, underscoring the necessity for structured training programs.

Conclusions: The integration of AI in radiology holds transformative potential but poses challenges, including overreliance, varying familiarity levels, and subspecialty-specific disparities. Structured education and robust regulatory frameworks are critical to optimize AI's adoption and minimize associated risks.

Advances in knowledge: This study highlights significant demographic variations in radiologists' attitudes toward AI and underscores the importance of targeted training and interventions to support effective AI integration. These findings add to the existing research by emphasizing the necessity for structured AI training tailored to demographic and subspecialty needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信