易火生态系统种子脂肪酸组成与物理休眠。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Sarah J McInnes, Ryan Tangney, Mark K J Ooi
{"title":"易火生态系统种子脂肪酸组成与物理休眠。","authors":"Sarah J McInnes, Ryan Tangney, Mark K J Ooi","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The maintenance of seed banks and timing of germination are fundamental to ensuring population persistence. Physical dormancy (PY) in disturbance-prone environments contributes to these processes via an impermeable seed coat. Dormancy is broken often by heating, which in fire-prone regions is determined by species-specific threshold temperatures. However, the mechanisms by which seeds persist or control dormancy-breaking thresholds in such environments is unclear. We determined whether unsaturated and saturated fatty acids (FAs; within triacylglycerols), a common lipid linked to heat-stress resilience, might contribute to seed coat dormancy and overall seed persistence, and whether fire selects for different FA compositions and drives PY function in fire-prone regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We characterised seed FA compositions of 26 Fabaceae species from fire-prone and fire-free ecosystems through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We compared FA saturation, total relative FA content and the highest melting point FA of each species across seed tissues (seed coat vs internal tissues) and habitat type (fire-prone vs fire-free) and, for fire-prone species, tested for a relationship with species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>No relationship between FA composition and species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds was found. Seeds of fire-free species had more saturated FAs than fire-prone species, particularly for internal tissues. FA saturation was higher in seed coats than internal tissues across both habitat types. Relative FA content was similar in internal tissues across habitat type but differed for seed coats, with fire-prone species having marginally more FAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While no correlation existed between FA composition and dormancy-breaking thresholds in fire-prone species, the consistent differences between seed tissue types we found highlights a similar role for FAs in seed coats across habitats, likely linked to maintaining impermeability. Some evidence supports fire selecting for greater total FA content in seed coats, however further work is needed to test its relationship with temperature thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seed fatty acid composition and physical dormancy in fire-prone ecosystems.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J McInnes, Ryan Tangney, Mark K J Ooi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aob/mcaf225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The maintenance of seed banks and timing of germination are fundamental to ensuring population persistence. Physical dormancy (PY) in disturbance-prone environments contributes to these processes via an impermeable seed coat. Dormancy is broken often by heating, which in fire-prone regions is determined by species-specific threshold temperatures. However, the mechanisms by which seeds persist or control dormancy-breaking thresholds in such environments is unclear. We determined whether unsaturated and saturated fatty acids (FAs; within triacylglycerols), a common lipid linked to heat-stress resilience, might contribute to seed coat dormancy and overall seed persistence, and whether fire selects for different FA compositions and drives PY function in fire-prone regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We characterised seed FA compositions of 26 Fabaceae species from fire-prone and fire-free ecosystems through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We compared FA saturation, total relative FA content and the highest melting point FA of each species across seed tissues (seed coat vs internal tissues) and habitat type (fire-prone vs fire-free) and, for fire-prone species, tested for a relationship with species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>No relationship between FA composition and species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds was found. Seeds of fire-free species had more saturated FAs than fire-prone species, particularly for internal tissues. FA saturation was higher in seed coats than internal tissues across both habitat types. Relative FA content was similar in internal tissues across habitat type but differed for seed coats, with fire-prone species having marginally more FAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While no correlation existed between FA composition and dormancy-breaking thresholds in fire-prone species, the consistent differences between seed tissue types we found highlights a similar role for FAs in seed coats across habitats, likely linked to maintaining impermeability. Some evidence supports fire selecting for greater total FA content in seed coats, however further work is needed to test its relationship with temperature thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf225\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:种子库的维护和发芽时间是确保种群持久性的基础。易受干扰环境中的物理休眠(PY)通过不透水的种皮促进了这些过程。休眠通常通过加热来打破,在火灾易发地区,这是由物种特定的阈温度决定的。然而,种子在这种环境中持续存在或控制休眠打破阈值的机制尚不清楚。我们确定了不饱和脂肪酸和饱和脂肪酸(FAs;在三酰基甘油中),一种与热应激恢复能力相关的常见脂质,是否可能有助于种皮休眠和整体种子持久性,以及火灾是否选择不同的FA成分并驱动火灾易发地区的PY功能。方法:采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术对易火生态系统和无火生态系统中26种豆科植物种子FA成分进行了鉴定。我们比较了每个物种不同种子组织(种皮与内部组织)和栖息地类型(易火与不易火)的FA饱和度、总相对FA含量和最高熔点FA,并测试了易火物种与物种特异性休眠打破阈值的关系。关键结果:FA组成与物种特有的休眠打破阈值没有关系。无火种种子的饱和脂肪酸含量高于易火种,特别是在内部组织中。两种生境类型种皮FA饱和度均高于内部组织FA饱和度。不同生境类型的种皮组织中FA的相对含量相似,但种皮中FA的相对含量不同,易火物种的相对含量略高。结论:虽然易着火物种的FA组成与休眠打破阈值之间不存在相关性,但我们发现不同种子组织类型之间的一致差异突出了FA在不同栖息地种皮中的相似作用,可能与保持不透水性有关。一些证据支持选择火可以提高种皮总FA含量,但需要进一步的工作来测试其与温度阈值的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seed fatty acid composition and physical dormancy in fire-prone ecosystems.

Background and aims: The maintenance of seed banks and timing of germination are fundamental to ensuring population persistence. Physical dormancy (PY) in disturbance-prone environments contributes to these processes via an impermeable seed coat. Dormancy is broken often by heating, which in fire-prone regions is determined by species-specific threshold temperatures. However, the mechanisms by which seeds persist or control dormancy-breaking thresholds in such environments is unclear. We determined whether unsaturated and saturated fatty acids (FAs; within triacylglycerols), a common lipid linked to heat-stress resilience, might contribute to seed coat dormancy and overall seed persistence, and whether fire selects for different FA compositions and drives PY function in fire-prone regions.

Methods: We characterised seed FA compositions of 26 Fabaceae species from fire-prone and fire-free ecosystems through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We compared FA saturation, total relative FA content and the highest melting point FA of each species across seed tissues (seed coat vs internal tissues) and habitat type (fire-prone vs fire-free) and, for fire-prone species, tested for a relationship with species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds.

Key results: No relationship between FA composition and species-specific dormancy-breaking thresholds was found. Seeds of fire-free species had more saturated FAs than fire-prone species, particularly for internal tissues. FA saturation was higher in seed coats than internal tissues across both habitat types. Relative FA content was similar in internal tissues across habitat type but differed for seed coats, with fire-prone species having marginally more FAs.

Conclusions: While no correlation existed between FA composition and dormancy-breaking thresholds in fire-prone species, the consistent differences between seed tissue types we found highlights a similar role for FAs in seed coats across habitats, likely linked to maintaining impermeability. Some evidence supports fire selecting for greater total FA content in seed coats, however further work is needed to test its relationship with temperature thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信