不同亚型SARS-CoV-2累计发病率及感染住院风险分析英国的一项纵向研究

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Charlotte Gaughan, David Braunholtz, Leanne Massie, Tarnjit Khera, Paul J Birrell, Daniela De Angelis, Josh Blake, Joy Preece, Koen Pouwels, Ann Sarah Walker, The Covid- Infection Survey Team
{"title":"不同亚型SARS-CoV-2累计发病率及感染住院风险分析英国的一项纵向研究","authors":"Charlotte Gaughan, David Braunholtz, Leanne Massie, Tarnjit Khera, Paul J Birrell, Daniela De Angelis, Josh Blake, Joy Preece, Koen Pouwels, Ann Sarah Walker, The Covid- Infection Survey Team","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID Infection Survey monitored daily positivity through the COVID-19 pandemic from April 26, 2020 to March 13, 2023. In total 451 079 participants in private residential households were enrolled in England and tested at regular intervals for SARS-CoV-2. Here, we estimated the cumulative incidence of PCR-positive infections using a multilevel regression and post-stratification model to obtain estimates of daily positivity, combined with a distribution of the duration of positivity from regular testing data. We estimated cumulative incidence by epoch (approximated by the dominance of successive SARS-CoV-2 variants) and calculated the corresponding infection-hospitalisation ratios. We found cumulative incidence was relatively low during pre-Alpha and Alpha-dominant epochs, rose steadily during the Delta-dominant epoch, and was highest during successive Omicron-dominant epochs. High cumulative incidences in successive Omicron-dominant epochs are consistent with lack of protection from previous infections. However, infection-hospitalisation ratios, whilst higher at the start of the pandemic, remained low after the Delta-dominant epoch and vaccine introduction. Stratified estimates show hospitalisation risk was consistently very low for younger age groups, increasing with age. Surveys with random sampling and longitudinal designs facilitate direct estimation of prevalence and incidence, however should be complemented by dense sampling to estimate duration of infection to maximise their value.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cumulative incidence and infection hospitalisation risk of SARS-CoV-2 by variant; a longitudinal study in England.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Gaughan, David Braunholtz, Leanne Massie, Tarnjit Khera, Paul J Birrell, Daniela De Angelis, Josh Blake, Joy Preece, Koen Pouwels, Ann Sarah Walker, The Covid- Infection Survey Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID Infection Survey monitored daily positivity through the COVID-19 pandemic from April 26, 2020 to March 13, 2023. In total 451 079 participants in private residential households were enrolled in England and tested at regular intervals for SARS-CoV-2. Here, we estimated the cumulative incidence of PCR-positive infections using a multilevel regression and post-stratification model to obtain estimates of daily positivity, combined with a distribution of the duration of positivity from regular testing data. We estimated cumulative incidence by epoch (approximated by the dominance of successive SARS-CoV-2 variants) and calculated the corresponding infection-hospitalisation ratios. We found cumulative incidence was relatively low during pre-Alpha and Alpha-dominant epochs, rose steadily during the Delta-dominant epoch, and was highest during successive Omicron-dominant epochs. High cumulative incidences in successive Omicron-dominant epochs are consistent with lack of protection from previous infections. However, infection-hospitalisation ratios, whilst higher at the start of the pandemic, remained low after the Delta-dominant epoch and vaccine introduction. Stratified estimates show hospitalisation risk was consistently very low for younger age groups, increasing with age. Surveys with random sampling and longitudinal designs facilitate direct estimation of prevalence and incidence, however should be complemented by dense sampling to estimate duration of infection to maximise their value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf203\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病感染调查从2020年4月26日至2023年3月13日监测了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的每日阳性情况。在英格兰,共有451 079名私人住宅家庭的参与者参加了这项研究,并定期对SARS-CoV-2进行检测。在这里,我们使用多水平回归和后分层模型来估计pcr阳性感染的累积发生率,以获得每日阳性估计,并结合常规检测数据的阳性持续时间分布。我们按时间估算了累积发病率(通过连续的SARS-CoV-2变异的优势来估算),并计算了相应的感染住院率。结果表明,前α期和α -优势期的累积发病率相对较低,三角洲优势期的累积发病率稳步上升,而连续欧米克隆优势期的累积发病率最高。在连续的欧米克隆显性时期,高累积发病率与缺乏对先前感染的保护是一致的。然而,感染住院率虽然在大流行开始时较高,但在三角洲病毒主导时期和疫苗引入后仍然很低。分层估计显示,年轻年龄组的住院风险一直很低,随着年龄的增长而增加。随机抽样和纵向设计的调查有助于直接估计患病率和发病率,但应辅以密集抽样来估计感染持续时间,以最大限度地发挥其价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The cumulative incidence and infection hospitalisation risk of SARS-CoV-2 by variant; a longitudinal study in England.

The COVID Infection Survey monitored daily positivity through the COVID-19 pandemic from April 26, 2020 to March 13, 2023. In total 451 079 participants in private residential households were enrolled in England and tested at regular intervals for SARS-CoV-2. Here, we estimated the cumulative incidence of PCR-positive infections using a multilevel regression and post-stratification model to obtain estimates of daily positivity, combined with a distribution of the duration of positivity from regular testing data. We estimated cumulative incidence by epoch (approximated by the dominance of successive SARS-CoV-2 variants) and calculated the corresponding infection-hospitalisation ratios. We found cumulative incidence was relatively low during pre-Alpha and Alpha-dominant epochs, rose steadily during the Delta-dominant epoch, and was highest during successive Omicron-dominant epochs. High cumulative incidences in successive Omicron-dominant epochs are consistent with lack of protection from previous infections. However, infection-hospitalisation ratios, whilst higher at the start of the pandemic, remained low after the Delta-dominant epoch and vaccine introduction. Stratified estimates show hospitalisation risk was consistently very low for younger age groups, increasing with age. Surveys with random sampling and longitudinal designs facilitate direct estimation of prevalence and incidence, however should be complemented by dense sampling to estimate duration of infection to maximise their value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信