“我们要啤酒”:对卡塔尔世界杯期间有关禁酒令的网络帖子的分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Erin Santamaria, Dan Anderson-Luxford, Zhen He, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Aiden Nibali, Jessica Ison, Nikita Potemkin, Benjamin Riordan
{"title":"“我们要啤酒”:对卡塔尔世界杯期间有关禁酒令的网络帖子的分析。","authors":"Erin Santamaria, Dan Anderson-Luxford, Zhen He, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Aiden Nibali, Jessica Ison, Nikita Potemkin, Benjamin Riordan","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The FIFA Men's World Cup is one of the largest global sporting events, with alcohol playing a notable role, evident from major sponsor Anheuser-Busch. Indeed, Brazil altered policies to allow alcohol in the 2015 tournament stadiums. Qatar, the 2022 World Cup host, initially assured alcohol availability in stadiums but reversed this decision 2 days before the tournament began, sparking widespread online discussions about alcohol's role in sports and policies. This study analyses the online discourse surrounding this alcohol ban.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected Tweets from a week prior to the tournament to a week after, using keywords referencing the World Cup, alcohol, and the ban. After excluding retweets, 5252 independent posts were coded by stance on the ban and underlying rationale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-ban tweets dominated (55.1%; 15.9% pro-ban; 29% neutral). We identified five primary themes. Three opposing the alcohol ban: (i) Timing Backlash: Sudden implementation, (ii) The Power of Budweiser: Impact on sponsor brands, and (iii) A Troubled World Cup: Contribution to other issues, and two supporting it: (iv) Spectator Sobriety: Alcohol's relevance in sport, and (v) Dry Stands, Safer Crowds: Potential to mitigate public disturbances.</p><p><strong>Discussions and conclusions: </strong>While just over half of Tweets opposed the alcohol ban, they focused on the ban's enactment and concerns over sponsor agreements rather than the absence of alcohol itself. Conversely, pro-ban tweets highlighted improved fan experience. Policymakers should consider how alcohol companies use social media to shape public opinion. Analysing online discourse can provide valuable insights for implementing and reviewing alcohol control strategies in sport.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'We want beer': an analysis of online posts written about the alcohol ban during Qatar's soccer world cup.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Santamaria, Dan Anderson-Luxford, Zhen He, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Aiden Nibali, Jessica Ison, Nikita Potemkin, Benjamin Riordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/alcalc/agaf059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The FIFA Men's World Cup is one of the largest global sporting events, with alcohol playing a notable role, evident from major sponsor Anheuser-Busch. Indeed, Brazil altered policies to allow alcohol in the 2015 tournament stadiums. Qatar, the 2022 World Cup host, initially assured alcohol availability in stadiums but reversed this decision 2 days before the tournament began, sparking widespread online discussions about alcohol's role in sports and policies. This study analyses the online discourse surrounding this alcohol ban.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected Tweets from a week prior to the tournament to a week after, using keywords referencing the World Cup, alcohol, and the ban. After excluding retweets, 5252 independent posts were coded by stance on the ban and underlying rationale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-ban tweets dominated (55.1%; 15.9% pro-ban; 29% neutral). We identified five primary themes. Three opposing the alcohol ban: (i) Timing Backlash: Sudden implementation, (ii) The Power of Budweiser: Impact on sponsor brands, and (iii) A Troubled World Cup: Contribution to other issues, and two supporting it: (iv) Spectator Sobriety: Alcohol's relevance in sport, and (v) Dry Stands, Safer Crowds: Potential to mitigate public disturbances.</p><p><strong>Discussions and conclusions: </strong>While just over half of Tweets opposed the alcohol ban, they focused on the ban's enactment and concerns over sponsor agreements rather than the absence of alcohol itself. Conversely, pro-ban tweets highlighted improved fan experience. Policymakers should consider how alcohol companies use social media to shape public opinion. Analysing online discourse can provide valuable insights for implementing and reviewing alcohol control strategies in sport.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol and alcoholism\",\"volume\":\"60 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol and alcoholism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:国际足联男子世界杯是全球最大的体育赛事之一,酒类在其中扮演着重要的角色,主要赞助商安海斯-布希公司(Anheuser-Busch)就证明了这一点。事实上,巴西改变了政策,允许在2015年的比赛场馆饮酒。2022年世界杯主办国卡塔尔最初保证了场馆内的酒精供应,但在比赛开始前两天改变了这一决定,引发了网上关于酒精在体育和政策中的作用的广泛讨论。这项研究分析了围绕禁酒令的网络讨论。方法:我们收集了比赛前一周到比赛后一周的推文,使用了涉及世界杯、酒精和禁令的关键词。在排除转发后,5252条独立帖子根据对禁令的立场和基本理由进行了编码。结果:反禁令推文占主导地位(55.1%,15.9%支持禁令,29%中立)。我们确定了五个主要主题。三个反对禁酒令:(i)时机反弹:突然实施;(ii)百威啤酒的力量:对赞助商品牌的影响;(iii)陷入困境的世界杯:对其他问题的贡献;以及两个支持禁酒令的:(iv)观众清醒:酒精与体育运动的相关性;(v)干燥的看台,更安全的人群:减轻公众骚乱的潜力。讨论和结论:虽然只有一半以上的推文反对禁酒令,但他们关注的是禁令的颁布和对赞助商协议的担忧,而不是没有酒精本身。相反,支持禁令的推文强调了球迷体验的改善。政策制定者应该考虑酒类公司如何利用社交媒体来塑造公众舆论。分析在线话语可以为实施和审查体育运动中的酒精控制策略提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

'We want beer': an analysis of online posts written about the alcohol ban during Qatar's soccer world cup.

'We want beer': an analysis of online posts written about the alcohol ban during Qatar's soccer world cup.

Introduction: The FIFA Men's World Cup is one of the largest global sporting events, with alcohol playing a notable role, evident from major sponsor Anheuser-Busch. Indeed, Brazil altered policies to allow alcohol in the 2015 tournament stadiums. Qatar, the 2022 World Cup host, initially assured alcohol availability in stadiums but reversed this decision 2 days before the tournament began, sparking widespread online discussions about alcohol's role in sports and policies. This study analyses the online discourse surrounding this alcohol ban.

Methods: We collected Tweets from a week prior to the tournament to a week after, using keywords referencing the World Cup, alcohol, and the ban. After excluding retweets, 5252 independent posts were coded by stance on the ban and underlying rationale.

Results: Anti-ban tweets dominated (55.1%; 15.9% pro-ban; 29% neutral). We identified five primary themes. Three opposing the alcohol ban: (i) Timing Backlash: Sudden implementation, (ii) The Power of Budweiser: Impact on sponsor brands, and (iii) A Troubled World Cup: Contribution to other issues, and two supporting it: (iv) Spectator Sobriety: Alcohol's relevance in sport, and (v) Dry Stands, Safer Crowds: Potential to mitigate public disturbances.

Discussions and conclusions: While just over half of Tweets opposed the alcohol ban, they focused on the ban's enactment and concerns over sponsor agreements rather than the absence of alcohol itself. Conversely, pro-ban tweets highlighted improved fan experience. Policymakers should consider how alcohol companies use social media to shape public opinion. Analysing online discourse can provide valuable insights for implementing and reviewing alcohol control strategies in sport.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信