Kunal Oswal, Satirtha Barman, Alexandar R Kerr, Murad Zaman, Jnyanashree Patowary, Debasis D Barali, Nipam Barman, Ashok Das, Umakant Nadkar, Rajesh Dikshit, Jennifer E Gallagher, Mark W Lingen, Richard Muwonge, Philip E Castle, Li C Cheung, Kelly J Yu, Anil K Chaturvedi, Arnie Purushotham
{"title":"口腔癌风险分层:印度东北部一项基于人群的横断面筛查研究。","authors":"Kunal Oswal, Satirtha Barman, Alexandar R Kerr, Murad Zaman, Jnyanashree Patowary, Debasis D Barali, Nipam Barman, Ashok Das, Umakant Nadkar, Rajesh Dikshit, Jennifer E Gallagher, Mark W Lingen, Richard Muwonge, Philip E Castle, Li C Cheung, Kelly J Yu, Anil K Chaturvedi, Arnie Purushotham","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a cross-sectional oral cancer screening study in Northeast India to develop and validate an oral precancer/cancer risk prediction model. We compared epidemiologic profiles between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. During 2018-2022, we recruited 14,749 participants who underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire and oral examination (visual inspection and autofluorescence). Logistic regression was used to compare risk factors between tobacco pouch keratosis and precancer/cancer and risk model development for prevalent lesions (keratosis and oral precancer/cancer, combined). Model validation was conducted internally and externally (Kerala oral cancer screening trial). Among the 14,749 participants, as per dentists' diagnosis, 1365 lesions were identified. These included 249 benign lesions (prevalence = 1.6%), 795 tobacco pouch keratosis (prevalence = 5.4%), and 321 precancers/cancers (prevalence = 2.2%). Agreement between dentists and health workers was high for visual diagnosis of prevalent lesions (keratotic/precancer/cancer; positive-agreement = 87.5%; kappa = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-0.78). Risk factor profiles were similar between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. The risk prediction model (based on age, sex, education, income, chewing duration, chewing type, smoking duration and intensity, alcohol duration and intensity) had good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and calibration (E/O ratio = 1.00) internally. Further, 30% of individuals at the highest model-predicted risk accounted for 81.8% of prevalent lesions. However, in external validation, the risk model had modest discrimination (AUC = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.66-0.68) and poor calibration (E/O ratio = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.50-0.54). Our results suggest tobacco pouch keratosis as an early carcinogenic event amenable for behavioral interception. Poor transportability of our risk model reflects the need for prediction models that account for geographic differences in risk factors within regions in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral cancer risk stratification: A cross-sectional population-based screening study in Northeast India.\",\"authors\":\"Kunal Oswal, Satirtha Barman, Alexandar R Kerr, Murad Zaman, Jnyanashree Patowary, Debasis D Barali, Nipam Barman, Ashok Das, Umakant Nadkar, Rajesh Dikshit, Jennifer E Gallagher, Mark W Lingen, Richard Muwonge, Philip E Castle, Li C Cheung, Kelly J Yu, Anil K Chaturvedi, Arnie Purushotham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a cross-sectional oral cancer screening study in Northeast India to develop and validate an oral precancer/cancer risk prediction model. We compared epidemiologic profiles between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. During 2018-2022, we recruited 14,749 participants who underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire and oral examination (visual inspection and autofluorescence). Logistic regression was used to compare risk factors between tobacco pouch keratosis and precancer/cancer and risk model development for prevalent lesions (keratosis and oral precancer/cancer, combined). Model validation was conducted internally and externally (Kerala oral cancer screening trial). Among the 14,749 participants, as per dentists' diagnosis, 1365 lesions were identified. These included 249 benign lesions (prevalence = 1.6%), 795 tobacco pouch keratosis (prevalence = 5.4%), and 321 precancers/cancers (prevalence = 2.2%). Agreement between dentists and health workers was high for visual diagnosis of prevalent lesions (keratotic/precancer/cancer; positive-agreement = 87.5%; kappa = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-0.78). Risk factor profiles were similar between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. The risk prediction model (based on age, sex, education, income, chewing duration, chewing type, smoking duration and intensity, alcohol duration and intensity) had good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and calibration (E/O ratio = 1.00) internally. Further, 30% of individuals at the highest model-predicted risk accounted for 81.8% of prevalent lesions. However, in external validation, the risk model had modest discrimination (AUC = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.66-0.68) and poor calibration (E/O ratio = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.50-0.54). Our results suggest tobacco pouch keratosis as an early carcinogenic event amenable for behavioral interception. Poor transportability of our risk model reflects the need for prediction models that account for geographic differences in risk factors within regions in India.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们在印度东北部进行了一项横断面口腔癌筛查研究,以开发和验证口腔癌前/癌风险预测模型。我们比较了烟草袋角化病和口腔癌前病变/癌的流行病学特征。在2018-2022年期间,我们招募了14,749名参与者,他们接受了访谈者管理的问卷调查和口腔检查(视觉检查和自体荧光)。采用Logistic回归比较烟草袋角化病和癌前病变/癌前病变之间的危险因素以及流行病变(角化病和口腔癌前病变/癌合并)的风险模型发展。模型验证在内部和外部进行(喀拉拉邦口腔癌筛查试验)。在14,749名参与者中,根据牙医的诊断,确定了1365个病变。其中包括249个良性病变(患病率为1.6%),795个烟袋角化病(患病率为5.4%),321个癌前病变/癌症(患病率为2.2%)。牙医和卫生工作者对常见病变(角化/癌前病变/癌前病变)的视觉诊断一致性很高;阳性一致性= 87.5%;kappa = 0.77; 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.75-0.78)。烟草袋角化病和口腔癌前病变/癌之间的危险因素相似。风险预测模型(基于年龄、性别、文化程度、收入、咀嚼时间、咀嚼类型、吸烟时间和强度、饮酒时间和强度)具有良好的内部判别性(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.83)和校准性(E/O比值= 1.00)。此外,30%的模型预测风险最高的个体占流行病变的81.8%。然而,在外部验证中,风险模型具有中等判别性(AUC = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.66-0.68)和较差的校准(E/O比= 0.52;95% CI = 0.50-0.54)。我们的研究结果表明,烟袋角化病是一种早期致癌事件,可以进行行为拦截。我们的风险模型的可移植性较差,这反映了印度需要考虑各地区风险因素的地理差异的预测模型。
Oral cancer risk stratification: A cross-sectional population-based screening study in Northeast India.
We conducted a cross-sectional oral cancer screening study in Northeast India to develop and validate an oral precancer/cancer risk prediction model. We compared epidemiologic profiles between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. During 2018-2022, we recruited 14,749 participants who underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire and oral examination (visual inspection and autofluorescence). Logistic regression was used to compare risk factors between tobacco pouch keratosis and precancer/cancer and risk model development for prevalent lesions (keratosis and oral precancer/cancer, combined). Model validation was conducted internally and externally (Kerala oral cancer screening trial). Among the 14,749 participants, as per dentists' diagnosis, 1365 lesions were identified. These included 249 benign lesions (prevalence = 1.6%), 795 tobacco pouch keratosis (prevalence = 5.4%), and 321 precancers/cancers (prevalence = 2.2%). Agreement between dentists and health workers was high for visual diagnosis of prevalent lesions (keratotic/precancer/cancer; positive-agreement = 87.5%; kappa = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-0.78). Risk factor profiles were similar between tobacco pouch keratosis and oral precancer/cancer. The risk prediction model (based on age, sex, education, income, chewing duration, chewing type, smoking duration and intensity, alcohol duration and intensity) had good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and calibration (E/O ratio = 1.00) internally. Further, 30% of individuals at the highest model-predicted risk accounted for 81.8% of prevalent lesions. However, in external validation, the risk model had modest discrimination (AUC = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.66-0.68) and poor calibration (E/O ratio = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.50-0.54). Our results suggest tobacco pouch keratosis as an early carcinogenic event amenable for behavioral interception. Poor transportability of our risk model reflects the need for prediction models that account for geographic differences in risk factors within regions in India.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories:
-Cancer Epidemiology-
Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics-
Infectious Causes of Cancer-
Innovative Tools and Methods-
Molecular Cancer Biology-
Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment-
Tumor Markers and Signatures-
Cancer Therapy and Prevention