{"title":"增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩病灶内治疗的比较疗效和复发风险:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"I-Chang Lai, Guan-Lun Huang, Kuan-Chun Lee, Po-Yuan Wu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertrophic scars and keloids are fibroproliferative disorders arising from aberrant wound healing, often leading to aesthetic disfigurement, functional impairment, and psychosocial burden. Intralesional therapies remain a mainstay of treatment, yet the comparative efficacy and recurrence profiles of different agents have not been definitively established. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Cochrane Library (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA) from inception through May 2025, restricted to English-language publications, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing two or more intralesional treatments for hypertrophic scars or keloids. Twenty-four eligible trials were included in a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis integrating direct and indirect comparisons. Pooled estimates demonstrated that triamcinolone acetonide combined with 5-fluorouracil (TAC+5-FU) achieved the most consistent improvements in treatment efficacy and recurrence control. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) ranked highest in treatment response but did not significantly reduce recurrence risk. Verapamil (VER) was associated with significantly lower efficacy compared with TAC, whereas bleomycin (BLM) and 5-FU monotherapies provided intermediate outcomes without statistical superiority. Overall, TAC+5-FU offered the most favorable balance between efficacy and recurrence reduction, while BTA showed strong response efficacy. These findings provide a comprehensive synthesis of intralesional therapies for hypertrophic scars and keloids, support the consideration of combination regimens in scar management, and underscore the need for further well-designed head-to-head trials with standardized endpoints to refine individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy and Recurrence Risk of Intralesional Therapies for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"I-Chang Lai, Guan-Lun Huang, Kuan-Chun Lee, Po-Yuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hypertrophic scars and keloids are fibroproliferative disorders arising from aberrant wound healing, often leading to aesthetic disfigurement, functional impairment, and psychosocial burden. Intralesional therapies remain a mainstay of treatment, yet the comparative efficacy and recurrence profiles of different agents have not been definitively established. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Cochrane Library (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA) from inception through May 2025, restricted to English-language publications, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing two or more intralesional treatments for hypertrophic scars or keloids. Twenty-four eligible trials were included in a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis integrating direct and indirect comparisons. Pooled estimates demonstrated that triamcinolone acetonide combined with 5-fluorouracil (TAC+5-FU) achieved the most consistent improvements in treatment efficacy and recurrence control. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) ranked highest in treatment response but did not significantly reduce recurrence risk. Verapamil (VER) was associated with significantly lower efficacy compared with TAC, whereas bleomycin (BLM) and 5-FU monotherapies provided intermediate outcomes without statistical superiority. Overall, TAC+5-FU offered the most favorable balance between efficacy and recurrence reduction, while BTA showed strong response efficacy. These findings provide a comprehensive synthesis of intralesional therapies for hypertrophic scars and keloids, support the consideration of combination regimens in scar management, and underscore the need for further well-designed head-to-head trials with standardized endpoints to refine individualized treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf182\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Efficacy and Recurrence Risk of Intralesional Therapies for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Hypertrophic scars and keloids are fibroproliferative disorders arising from aberrant wound healing, often leading to aesthetic disfigurement, functional impairment, and psychosocial burden. Intralesional therapies remain a mainstay of treatment, yet the comparative efficacy and recurrence profiles of different agents have not been definitively established. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Cochrane Library (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Google Scholar (Alphabet, Inc., Mountain View, CA) from inception through May 2025, restricted to English-language publications, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing two or more intralesional treatments for hypertrophic scars or keloids. Twenty-four eligible trials were included in a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis integrating direct and indirect comparisons. Pooled estimates demonstrated that triamcinolone acetonide combined with 5-fluorouracil (TAC+5-FU) achieved the most consistent improvements in treatment efficacy and recurrence control. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) ranked highest in treatment response but did not significantly reduce recurrence risk. Verapamil (VER) was associated with significantly lower efficacy compared with TAC, whereas bleomycin (BLM) and 5-FU monotherapies provided intermediate outcomes without statistical superiority. Overall, TAC+5-FU offered the most favorable balance between efficacy and recurrence reduction, while BTA showed strong response efficacy. These findings provide a comprehensive synthesis of intralesional therapies for hypertrophic scars and keloids, support the consideration of combination regimens in scar management, and underscore the need for further well-designed head-to-head trials with standardized endpoints to refine individualized treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.