{"title":"亚当·莱特的反理论方法论","authors":"Hilary Kornblith","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00332-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adam Leite defends a response to skepticism in his <i>How to Take Skepticism Seriously</i> which, he argues, is a product of an antitheoretical methodology. This paper examines what a commitment to such a methodology might involve and argues that such an approach is not defensible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adam Leite’s antitheoretical methodology\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Kornblith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-025-00332-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adam Leite defends a response to skepticism in his <i>How to Take Skepticism Seriously</i> which, he argues, is a product of an antitheoretical methodology. This paper examines what a commitment to such a methodology might involve and argues that such an approach is not defensible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00332-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00332-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam Leite defends a response to skepticism in his How to Take Skepticism Seriously which, he argues, is a product of an antitheoretical methodology. This paper examines what a commitment to such a methodology might involve and argues that such an approach is not defensible.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
