{"title":"美国英语中的语言积极性:过去两个世纪的大规模历时研究","authors":"Gui Wang, Zenan Chen, Bin Shao","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the shifts in linguistic positivity in general American English from the 1820s to the 2000s using a 430-million-token structured historical corpus. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of external environmental and internal psychological factors on linguistic positivity. Results showed a significant decline in both positive and negative expressions, indicating a broader societal move from emotionality to rationality in the USA over the past two centuries. Our findings also demonstrated that major wars, unemployment rates, and subjective happiness significantly affect changes in positivity. Notably, while major conflicts generally exert downward pressure on the linguistic positivity, broader historical, socio-cultural, and technological contexts can shape and at times counterbalance this effect, as evidenced by the contrasting linguistic responses to the Korean and Vietnam Wars. This study offers valuable insights into how language mirrors and responds to societal values and historical events. By detailing the interaction between language use and various influencing factors, our research suggests that combining word-level and sentence-level linguistic positivity bias analysis might offer potential applications for monitoring collective well-being and societal trends, enabling more responsive interventions.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic positivity in American English: A large-scale diachronic study over the past two centuries\",\"authors\":\"Gui Wang, Zenan Chen, Bin Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/applin/amaf054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the shifts in linguistic positivity in general American English from the 1820s to the 2000s using a 430-million-token structured historical corpus. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of external environmental and internal psychological factors on linguistic positivity. Results showed a significant decline in both positive and negative expressions, indicating a broader societal move from emotionality to rationality in the USA over the past two centuries. Our findings also demonstrated that major wars, unemployment rates, and subjective happiness significantly affect changes in positivity. Notably, while major conflicts generally exert downward pressure on the linguistic positivity, broader historical, socio-cultural, and technological contexts can shape and at times counterbalance this effect, as evidenced by the contrasting linguistic responses to the Korean and Vietnam Wars. This study offers valuable insights into how language mirrors and responds to societal values and historical events. By detailing the interaction between language use and various influencing factors, our research suggests that combining word-level and sentence-level linguistic positivity bias analysis might offer potential applications for monitoring collective well-being and societal trends, enabling more responsive interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf054\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Linguistic positivity in American English: A large-scale diachronic study over the past two centuries
This study examines the shifts in linguistic positivity in general American English from the 1820s to the 2000s using a 430-million-token structured historical corpus. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of external environmental and internal psychological factors on linguistic positivity. Results showed a significant decline in both positive and negative expressions, indicating a broader societal move from emotionality to rationality in the USA over the past two centuries. Our findings also demonstrated that major wars, unemployment rates, and subjective happiness significantly affect changes in positivity. Notably, while major conflicts generally exert downward pressure on the linguistic positivity, broader historical, socio-cultural, and technological contexts can shape and at times counterbalance this effect, as evidenced by the contrasting linguistic responses to the Korean and Vietnam Wars. This study offers valuable insights into how language mirrors and responds to societal values and historical events. By detailing the interaction between language use and various influencing factors, our research suggests that combining word-level and sentence-level linguistic positivity bias analysis might offer potential applications for monitoring collective well-being and societal trends, enabling more responsive interventions.
期刊介绍:
Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.