大气颗粒物氧化电位作为空气污染健康风险指标的研究进展

IF 20.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qingyang Liu, James J. Schauer
{"title":"大气颗粒物氧化电位作为空气污染健康风险指标的研究进展","authors":"Qingyang Liu, James J. Schauer","doi":"10.1007/s10311-025-01882-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Health impact of atmospheric particulate matter is traditionally assessed using mass concentrations of particulate matter, yet epidemiological findings reveal inconsistencies, and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases often correlate more strongly with the oxidative potential of particulate matter, which reflects its ability to generate reactive oxygen species and induce oxidative stress. Here we review the oxidative potential of particulate matter in more than 200 field studies, with focus on epidemiological evidence, methods, influencing factors, and the contribution of the emission sources. Methods to assess the oxidative potential include electron spin resonance, the dithiothreitol and dichlorofluorescein assays, antioxidant depletion, and hydroxyl radical production. Major influencing factors comprise particle size and the presence of metals and carbonaceous aerosols. We observed that the oxidative potential varies substantially depending on particle size, the presence of transition metals and quinones, and emission sources such as biomass burning and traffic. Existing assays vary in their sensitivity to specific components of particulate matter, making comparisons between studies challenging. Methodological decisions such as the choice of extraction solvents and filter types can significantly change the measured oxidative potential. Overall, there is a need for standardized protocols and longitudinal studies linking oxidative potential to health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":541,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Chemistry Letters","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The oxidative potential of atmospheric particulate matter as an indicator of health risk of air pollution: a review\",\"authors\":\"Qingyang Liu, James J. Schauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10311-025-01882-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Health impact of atmospheric particulate matter is traditionally assessed using mass concentrations of particulate matter, yet epidemiological findings reveal inconsistencies, and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases often correlate more strongly with the oxidative potential of particulate matter, which reflects its ability to generate reactive oxygen species and induce oxidative stress. Here we review the oxidative potential of particulate matter in more than 200 field studies, with focus on epidemiological evidence, methods, influencing factors, and the contribution of the emission sources. Methods to assess the oxidative potential include electron spin resonance, the dithiothreitol and dichlorofluorescein assays, antioxidant depletion, and hydroxyl radical production. Major influencing factors comprise particle size and the presence of metals and carbonaceous aerosols. We observed that the oxidative potential varies substantially depending on particle size, the presence of transition metals and quinones, and emission sources such as biomass burning and traffic. Existing assays vary in their sensitivity to specific components of particulate matter, making comparisons between studies challenging. Methodological decisions such as the choice of extraction solvents and filter types can significantly change the measured oxidative potential. Overall, there is a need for standardized protocols and longitudinal studies linking oxidative potential to health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Chemistry Letters\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Chemistry Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-025-01882-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Chemistry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-025-01882-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上使用颗粒物的质量浓度来评估大气颗粒物对健康的影响,但流行病学调查结果显示不一致,呼吸道和心血管疾病往往与颗粒物的氧化电位有更强的相关性,这反映了其产生活性氧和诱导氧化应激的能力。在此,我们回顾了200多个现场研究中颗粒物氧化电位的研究,重点介绍了流行病学证据、方法、影响因素以及排放源的贡献。评估氧化电位的方法包括电子自旋共振、二硫代苏糖醇和二氯荧光素测定、抗氧化剂消耗和羟基自由基产生。主要影响因素包括颗粒大小以及金属和碳质气溶胶的存在。我们观察到氧化电位在很大程度上取决于颗粒大小、过渡金属和醌的存在以及诸如生物质燃烧和交通等排放源。现有的分析方法对颗粒物的特定成分的敏感性各不相同,这使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性。方法上的决定,如萃取溶剂和过滤类型的选择,可以显著改变测量的氧化电位。总的来说,需要标准化的方案和纵向研究将氧化潜能与健康结果联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The oxidative potential of atmospheric particulate matter as an indicator of health risk of air pollution: a review

Health impact of atmospheric particulate matter is traditionally assessed using mass concentrations of particulate matter, yet epidemiological findings reveal inconsistencies, and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases often correlate more strongly with the oxidative potential of particulate matter, which reflects its ability to generate reactive oxygen species and induce oxidative stress. Here we review the oxidative potential of particulate matter in more than 200 field studies, with focus on epidemiological evidence, methods, influencing factors, and the contribution of the emission sources. Methods to assess the oxidative potential include electron spin resonance, the dithiothreitol and dichlorofluorescein assays, antioxidant depletion, and hydroxyl radical production. Major influencing factors comprise particle size and the presence of metals and carbonaceous aerosols. We observed that the oxidative potential varies substantially depending on particle size, the presence of transition metals and quinones, and emission sources such as biomass burning and traffic. Existing assays vary in their sensitivity to specific components of particulate matter, making comparisons between studies challenging. Methodological decisions such as the choice of extraction solvents and filter types can significantly change the measured oxidative potential. Overall, there is a need for standardized protocols and longitudinal studies linking oxidative potential to health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Chemistry Letters
Environmental Chemistry Letters 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
32.00
自引率
7.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Chemistry Letters explores the intersections of geology, chemistry, physics, and biology. Published articles are of paramount importance to the examination of both natural and engineered environments. The journal features original and review articles of exceptional significance, encompassing topics such as the characterization of natural and impacted environments, the behavior, prevention, treatment, and control of mineral, organic, and radioactive pollutants. It also delves into interfacial studies involving diverse media like soil, sediment, water, air, organisms, and food. Additionally, the journal covers green chemistry, environmentally friendly synthetic pathways, alternative fuels, ecotoxicology, risk assessment, environmental processes and modeling, environmental technologies, remediation and control, and environmental analytical chemistry using biomolecular tools and tracers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信