Yong Mong Bee, Neha Awasthi, Mihir Gandhi, Amanda Yun Rui Lam, Selly Julianty, Gilbert Choon Seng Tan, Emily Tse Lin Ho, Su-Yen Goh, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Eugene Jin Wen Shum, Yu Qi Lee, Mary Foong Fong Chong, Tazeen H Jafar, Rob M van Dam, Yee Leong Teoh, Julian Thumboo, Eric Andrew Finkelstein
{"title":"在多种族亚洲糖尿病前期队列中,激励增强的阶梯护理干预方案在糖尿病预防中的有效性:来自预测的随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"Yong Mong Bee, Neha Awasthi, Mihir Gandhi, Amanda Yun Rui Lam, Selly Julianty, Gilbert Choon Seng Tan, Emily Tse Lin Ho, Su-Yen Goh, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Eugene Jin Wen Shum, Yu Qi Lee, Mary Foong Fong Chong, Tazeen H Jafar, Rob M van Dam, Yee Leong Teoh, Julian Thumboo, Eric Andrew Finkelstein","doi":"10.2337/dc25-1555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes prevention in real-world settings is affected by the challenge of intervention adherence and difficulty in sustaining behavior change. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a stepped care prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, in reducing the risk of diabetes conversion in a multiethnic prediabetes cohort in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease Out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) trial was a randomized controlled trial involving 751 overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both. Participants were assigned to standard care (control arm) or a stepped care intervention program, starting with lifestyle interventions for 6 months before adding metformin for participants who remained at high risk of diabetes conversion based on study visit assessments. Intervention arm participants also received financial incentives for attending lifestyle sessions and for achieving ≥5% weight loss. The primary end point was the proportion of participants developing diabetes at 3 years in the modified intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 years, 34.8% of participants in the intervention arm developed diabetes compared with 47.3% in the control arm (adjusted risk difference -10.93%; 95% CI -18.04 to -3.81; P = 0.003). The adjusted relative risk was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88; P < 0.001). In the intervention arm, 26.4% of participants received metformin, and 45.1% received cash incentives. Adverse events were more common in the intervention arm, mainly because of metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stepped care diabetes prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, effectively reduced diabetes conversion in a multiethnic Asian prediabetes cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of an Incentives-Enhanced Stepped Care Intervention Program in Diabetes Prevention in a Multiethnic Asian Prediabetes Cohort: Results From the Pre-DICTED Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Mong Bee, Neha Awasthi, Mihir Gandhi, Amanda Yun Rui Lam, Selly Julianty, Gilbert Choon Seng Tan, Emily Tse Lin Ho, Su-Yen Goh, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Eugene Jin Wen Shum, Yu Qi Lee, Mary Foong Fong Chong, Tazeen H Jafar, Rob M van Dam, Yee Leong Teoh, Julian Thumboo, Eric Andrew Finkelstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc25-1555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes prevention in real-world settings is affected by the challenge of intervention adherence and difficulty in sustaining behavior change. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a stepped care prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, in reducing the risk of diabetes conversion in a multiethnic prediabetes cohort in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease Out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) trial was a randomized controlled trial involving 751 overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both. Participants were assigned to standard care (control arm) or a stepped care intervention program, starting with lifestyle interventions for 6 months before adding metformin for participants who remained at high risk of diabetes conversion based on study visit assessments. Intervention arm participants also received financial incentives for attending lifestyle sessions and for achieving ≥5% weight loss. The primary end point was the proportion of participants developing diabetes at 3 years in the modified intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3 years, 34.8% of participants in the intervention arm developed diabetes compared with 47.3% in the control arm (adjusted risk difference -10.93%; 95% CI -18.04 to -3.81; P = 0.003). The adjusted relative risk was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88; P < 0.001). In the intervention arm, 26.4% of participants received metformin, and 45.1% received cash incentives. Adverse events were more common in the intervention arm, mainly because of metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A stepped care diabetes prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, effectively reduced diabetes conversion in a multiethnic Asian prediabetes cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-1555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-1555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:现实世界中的糖尿病预防受到干预依从性的挑战和持续行为改变的困难的影响。本研究评估了阶梯式护理预防计划的有效性,并辅以财政激励,以降低新加坡多种族糖尿病前期队列中糖尿病转化的风险。研究设计和方法:糖尿病前期干预和持续跟踪以缓解糖尿病(predicted)试验是一项随机对照试验,涉及751名超重或肥胖的糖耐量受损,空腹血糖受损或两者兼有。参与者被分配到标准治疗组(对照组)或阶梯式治疗干预方案,从生活方式干预开始6个月,然后根据研究访问评估,对糖尿病转化风险仍然很高的参与者添加二甲双胍。干预组的参与者也因参加生活方式会议和体重减轻≥5%而获得经济奖励。主要终点是在修改意向治疗人群中3年发生糖尿病的参与者比例。结果:3年后,干预组中34.8%的参与者患糖尿病,而对照组为47.3%(调整后的风险差为-10.93%;95% CI为-18.04 ~ -3.81;P = 0.003)。校正后的相对危险度为0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88; P < 0.001)。在干预组中,26.4%的参与者获得了二甲双胍,45.1%的参与者获得了现金奖励。不良事件在干预组更为常见,主要是因为二甲双胍相关的胃肠道症状。结论:阶梯式糖尿病预防项目,辅以财政激励,有效降低了多种族亚洲糖尿病前期人群的糖尿病转化。
Effectiveness of an Incentives-Enhanced Stepped Care Intervention Program in Diabetes Prevention in a Multiethnic Asian Prediabetes Cohort: Results From the Pre-DICTED Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective: Diabetes prevention in real-world settings is affected by the challenge of intervention adherence and difficulty in sustaining behavior change. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a stepped care prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, in reducing the risk of diabetes conversion in a multiethnic prediabetes cohort in Singapore.
Research design and methods: The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease Out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) trial was a randomized controlled trial involving 751 overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both. Participants were assigned to standard care (control arm) or a stepped care intervention program, starting with lifestyle interventions for 6 months before adding metformin for participants who remained at high risk of diabetes conversion based on study visit assessments. Intervention arm participants also received financial incentives for attending lifestyle sessions and for achieving ≥5% weight loss. The primary end point was the proportion of participants developing diabetes at 3 years in the modified intention-to-treat population.
Results: After 3 years, 34.8% of participants in the intervention arm developed diabetes compared with 47.3% in the control arm (adjusted risk difference -10.93%; 95% CI -18.04 to -3.81; P = 0.003). The adjusted relative risk was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88; P < 0.001). In the intervention arm, 26.4% of participants received metformin, and 45.1% received cash incentives. Adverse events were more common in the intervention arm, mainly because of metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms.
Conclusions: A stepped care diabetes prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, effectively reduced diabetes conversion in a multiethnic Asian prediabetes cohort.