加纳二级卫生机构医护人员COVID-19疫苗犹豫的决定因素

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004980
Gloria Addobea Kumi, Mawuli Gohoho, Fortress Yayra Aku
{"title":"加纳二级卫生机构医护人员COVID-19疫苗犹豫的决定因素","authors":"Gloria Addobea Kumi, Mawuli Gohoho, Fortress Yayra Aku","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine hesitancy has been a long-standing concern globally and emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare personnel. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ghana. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 419 randomly selected healthcare personnel to collect sociodemographic, individual-level, community-level, and health system-level data, including vaccine uptake. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at a 95% confidence level. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was found in 105 (25.1%) of respondents. Increased odds of vaccine hesitancy were associated with having 6-10 years of work experience (AOR = 3.43 95% CI = 1.44-8.18), being a midwife (AOR = 2.72 95% CI = 1.15-6.46), belief that vaccination does not guarantee protection against re-infection (AOR = 5.21 95% CI = 1.79-15.22), fear of long-term effects of COVID-19 (AOR = 2.14 95% CI = 1.18-3.86), perception of increased adverse effects among vaccinated individuals (AOR = 2.79 95% CI = 1.37-5.66), and community perception of long-term health effects of vaccination (AOR = 2.69 95% CI = 1.26-5.78). Awareness that health facilities were available to manage adverse effects reduced the odds of hesitancy (AOR = 0.23 95% CI = 0.12-0.43). Our study found that one in four healthcare personnel in the Volta Regional Hospital reported hesitancy toward receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Targeted risk communication and confidence-building strategies tailored to midwives and healthcare workers with longer years of service, including interventions aimed at improving perceptions of vaccine efficacy and safety, may enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0004980"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel in a secondary-level health facility in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Addobea Kumi, Mawuli Gohoho, Fortress Yayra Aku\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vaccine hesitancy has been a long-standing concern globally and emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare personnel. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ghana. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 419 randomly selected healthcare personnel to collect sociodemographic, individual-level, community-level, and health system-level data, including vaccine uptake. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at a 95% confidence level. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was found in 105 (25.1%) of respondents. Increased odds of vaccine hesitancy were associated with having 6-10 years of work experience (AOR = 3.43 95% CI = 1.44-8.18), being a midwife (AOR = 2.72 95% CI = 1.15-6.46), belief that vaccination does not guarantee protection against re-infection (AOR = 5.21 95% CI = 1.79-15.22), fear of long-term effects of COVID-19 (AOR = 2.14 95% CI = 1.18-3.86), perception of increased adverse effects among vaccinated individuals (AOR = 2.79 95% CI = 1.37-5.66), and community perception of long-term health effects of vaccination (AOR = 2.69 95% CI = 1.26-5.78). Awareness that health facilities were available to manage adverse effects reduced the odds of hesitancy (AOR = 0.23 95% CI = 0.12-0.43). Our study found that one in four healthcare personnel in the Volta Regional Hospital reported hesitancy toward receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Targeted risk communication and confidence-building strategies tailored to midwives and healthcare workers with longer years of service, including interventions aimed at improving perceptions of vaccine efficacy and safety, may enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e0004980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗犹豫一直是全球长期关注的问题,并在COVID-19大流行期间出现在医护人员中。本研究评估了加纳Volta地区医院医护人员中疫苗犹豫的患病率和决定因素。对随机选择的419名卫生保健人员进行了横断面研究,以收集社会人口学、个人水平、社区水平和卫生系统水平的数据,包括疫苗接种。采用多变量logistic回归分析,在95%的置信水平上评估COVID-19疫苗犹豫的决定因素。105名应答者(25.1%)出现COVID-19疫苗犹豫。有6-10年的工作经验(AOR = 3.43 95% CI = 1.44-8.18)、是助产士(AOR = 2.72 95% CI = 1.15-6.46)、认为接种疫苗不能保证防止再次感染(AOR = 5.21 95% CI = 1.79-15.22)、担心COVID-19的长期影响(AOR = 2.14 95% CI = 1.18-3.86)、认为接种疫苗个体的不良反应增加(AOR = 2.79 95% CI = 1.37-5.66)、社区对疫苗接种长期健康影响的认知(AOR = 2.69 95% CI = 1.26-5.78)。意识到有卫生设施可以管理不良反应,减少了犹豫的几率(AOR = 0.23 95% CI = 0.12-0.43)。我们的研究发现,沃尔特地区医院四分之一的医护人员报告说,他们对接种COVID-19疫苗犹豫不决。为服务年限较长的助产士和卫生保健工作者量身定制的有针对性的风险沟通和建立信任战略,包括旨在提高对疫苗效力和安全性认识的干预措施,可能会提高COVID-19疫苗的吸收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel in a secondary-level health facility in Ghana.

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel in a secondary-level health facility in Ghana.

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel in a secondary-level health facility in Ghana.

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel in a secondary-level health facility in Ghana.

Vaccine hesitancy has been a long-standing concern globally and emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare personnel. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ghana. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 419 randomly selected healthcare personnel to collect sociodemographic, individual-level, community-level, and health system-level data, including vaccine uptake. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at a 95% confidence level. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was found in 105 (25.1%) of respondents. Increased odds of vaccine hesitancy were associated with having 6-10 years of work experience (AOR = 3.43 95% CI = 1.44-8.18), being a midwife (AOR = 2.72 95% CI = 1.15-6.46), belief that vaccination does not guarantee protection against re-infection (AOR = 5.21 95% CI = 1.79-15.22), fear of long-term effects of COVID-19 (AOR = 2.14 95% CI = 1.18-3.86), perception of increased adverse effects among vaccinated individuals (AOR = 2.79 95% CI = 1.37-5.66), and community perception of long-term health effects of vaccination (AOR = 2.69 95% CI = 1.26-5.78). Awareness that health facilities were available to manage adverse effects reduced the odds of hesitancy (AOR = 0.23 95% CI = 0.12-0.43). Our study found that one in four healthcare personnel in the Volta Regional Hospital reported hesitancy toward receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Targeted risk communication and confidence-building strategies tailored to midwives and healthcare workers with longer years of service, including interventions aimed at improving perceptions of vaccine efficacy and safety, may enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信