参与艺术中的隐性叙事与痴呆症患者的合作。

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Julia Henderson
{"title":"参与艺术中的隐性叙事与痴呆症患者的合作。","authors":"Julia Henderson","doi":"10.1002/hast.4998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, participatory arts programs for people with lived experience of dementia have expanded in scale, number, and approach, both in North America and the United Kingdom. This narrative analysis considers how participatory arts programs and practices generate implicit narratives about what it means to live with dementia and about the value and meaning of arts and creativity to human experience. Using as examples several large-scale, multiyear, community-engaged, co-creative projects, I argue that these projects and others like them (a) shift cultural imaginaries of dementia through implicit narratives that construct lived experience as a legitimate form of knowledge, (b) uphold creativity as a universal quality, and (c) reimagine health and well-being discourses to include understandings of well-being that include ill-being. The projects construct implicit narratives about what living with dementia means—shifting away from notions of dementia as pathology and loss toward understandings of dementia that include creative potential, citizenship, and new conceptualizations of well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 S1","pages":"S89-S96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit Narratives in Participatory Arts Collaborations with People with Lived Experience of Dementia\",\"authors\":\"Julia Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past decade, participatory arts programs for people with lived experience of dementia have expanded in scale, number, and approach, both in North America and the United Kingdom. This narrative analysis considers how participatory arts programs and practices generate implicit narratives about what it means to live with dementia and about the value and meaning of arts and creativity to human experience. Using as examples several large-scale, multiyear, community-engaged, co-creative projects, I argue that these projects and others like them (a) shift cultural imaginaries of dementia through implicit narratives that construct lived experience as a legitimate form of knowledge, (b) uphold creativity as a universal quality, and (c) reimagine health and well-being discourses to include understandings of well-being that include ill-being. The projects construct implicit narratives about what living with dementia means—shifting away from notions of dementia as pathology and loss toward understandings of dementia that include creative potential, citizenship, and new conceptualizations of well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 S1\",\"pages\":\"S89-S96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4998\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年里,无论是在北美还是在英国,针对痴呆症患者的参与性艺术项目在规模、数量和方法上都有所扩大。这种叙事分析考虑了参与性艺术项目和实践如何产生关于痴呆症患者生活意味着什么以及艺术和创造力对人类体验的价值和意义的隐含叙事。我以几个大规模的、多年的、社区参与的、共同创造的项目为例,认为这些项目和其他类似的项目(a)通过将生活经验构建为合法知识形式的隐性叙述来改变对痴呆症的文化想象,(b)坚持将创造力作为一种普遍品质,以及(c)重新构想健康和福祉话语,以包括对福祉的理解。这些项目构建了关于痴呆症患者生活意味着什么的隐式叙述——从痴呆症作为病理学和损失的概念转向对痴呆症的理解,包括创造潜力、公民身份和幸福的新概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implicit Narratives in Participatory Arts Collaborations with People with Lived Experience of Dementia

Over the past decade, participatory arts programs for people with lived experience of dementia have expanded in scale, number, and approach, both in North America and the United Kingdom. This narrative analysis considers how participatory arts programs and practices generate implicit narratives about what it means to live with dementia and about the value and meaning of arts and creativity to human experience. Using as examples several large-scale, multiyear, community-engaged, co-creative projects, I argue that these projects and others like them (a) shift cultural imaginaries of dementia through implicit narratives that construct lived experience as a legitimate form of knowledge, (b) uphold creativity as a universal quality, and (c) reimagine health and well-being discourses to include understandings of well-being that include ill-being. The projects construct implicit narratives about what living with dementia means—shifting away from notions of dementia as pathology and loss toward understandings of dementia that include creative potential, citizenship, and new conceptualizations of well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信