从自我倡导到团结:超越个人身份的残疾和痴呆叙事。

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Liz Bowen, Katie Savin
{"title":"从自我倡导到团结:超越个人身份的残疾和痴呆叙事。","authors":"Liz Bowen,&nbsp;Katie Savin","doi":"10.1002/hast.4999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does the pursuit of disability justice for people with dementia require that people with dementia personally identify as disabled? On one level, self-representation has been a critical strategy for combating harmful and inaccurate assumptions that people with disabilities or dementia are inherently incapable of self-advocacy. At the same time, disability-rights narratives in which self-representation is fundamental to liberation cannot fully account for the realities of people with advanced dementia or other conditions that profoundly affect cognitive function. This essay argues that bringing disability and dementia advocacy together requires a shift beyond identity-based personal narratives and toward <i>structural narratives</i> that illustrate the processes through which dementia is historically constructed and that imagine alternatives to those processes. Such narratives not only reveal the effects of ableism beyond those who identify as disabled but also illuminate possibilities for resisting harmful structural forces through coalitional organizing and solidarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 S1","pages":"S97-S104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4999","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Self-Advocacy to Solidarity: Narrating Disability and Dementia beyond Personal Identity\",\"authors\":\"Liz Bowen,&nbsp;Katie Savin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Does the pursuit of disability justice for people with dementia require that people with dementia personally identify as disabled? On one level, self-representation has been a critical strategy for combating harmful and inaccurate assumptions that people with disabilities or dementia are inherently incapable of self-advocacy. At the same time, disability-rights narratives in which self-representation is fundamental to liberation cannot fully account for the realities of people with advanced dementia or other conditions that profoundly affect cognitive function. This essay argues that bringing disability and dementia advocacy together requires a shift beyond identity-based personal narratives and toward <i>structural narratives</i> that illustrate the processes through which dementia is historically constructed and that imagine alternatives to those processes. Such narratives not only reveal the effects of ableism beyond those who identify as disabled but also illuminate possibilities for resisting harmful structural forces through coalitional organizing and solidarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 S1\",\"pages\":\"S97-S104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4999\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为痴呆症患者寻求残疾正义是否要求痴呆症患者个人认为自己是残疾人?在一个层面上,自我代表是对抗有害和不准确的假设的关键策略,即残疾人或痴呆症患者天生无法自我宣传。与此同时,将自我表达作为解放基础的残疾人权利叙事,并不能完全解释患有晚期痴呆症或其他严重影响认知功能的疾病的人的现实。本文认为,将残疾和痴呆症倡导结合起来需要从基于身份的个人叙事转向结构性叙事,这种叙事说明了痴呆症在历史上被构建的过程,并设想了这些过程的替代方案。这样的叙述不仅揭示了残疾歧视对那些自认为是残疾人的人的影响,而且阐明了通过联合组织和团结抵制有害结构性力量的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Self-Advocacy to Solidarity: Narrating Disability and Dementia beyond Personal Identity

Does the pursuit of disability justice for people with dementia require that people with dementia personally identify as disabled? On one level, self-representation has been a critical strategy for combating harmful and inaccurate assumptions that people with disabilities or dementia are inherently incapable of self-advocacy. At the same time, disability-rights narratives in which self-representation is fundamental to liberation cannot fully account for the realities of people with advanced dementia or other conditions that profoundly affect cognitive function. This essay argues that bringing disability and dementia advocacy together requires a shift beyond identity-based personal narratives and toward structural narratives that illustrate the processes through which dementia is historically constructed and that imagine alternatives to those processes. Such narratives not only reveal the effects of ableism beyond those who identify as disabled but also illuminate possibilities for resisting harmful structural forces through coalitional organizing and solidarity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信