痴呆症、叙事和地点:从老年友好运动中学到什么?

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Richard Ward, Andrew Clark
{"title":"痴呆症、叙事和地点:从老年友好运动中学到什么?","authors":"Richard Ward,&nbsp;Andrew Clark","doi":"10.1002/hast.4988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay considers policy narratives of aging and dementia, what they do, and where they lead. It is argued that a renewed policy narrative of dementia is long overdue, and the authors reflect upon the value of drawing on the established age-friendly cities and communities movement to help guide the crafting of this new narrative. The essay develops three points: first, that efforts to promote an age- and latterly dementia-friendly agenda have elided a series of tensions within each program; second, that these tensions often materialize and are perhaps best understood at the point where policy is implemented and “lived out”; and third, that such points of friction provide a useful focus for future dialogue between the hitherto largely parallel and disconnected trajectories of age- and dementia-friendly agendas. Fostering such a dialogue can strengthen an evolving policy critique and ultimately help refine policy-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 S1","pages":"S19-S28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4988","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dementia, Narrative, and Place: What Can Be Learned from the Age-Friendly Movement?\",\"authors\":\"Richard Ward,&nbsp;Andrew Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This essay considers policy narratives of aging and dementia, what they do, and where they lead. It is argued that a renewed policy narrative of dementia is long overdue, and the authors reflect upon the value of drawing on the established age-friendly cities and communities movement to help guide the crafting of this new narrative. The essay develops three points: first, that efforts to promote an age- and latterly dementia-friendly agenda have elided a series of tensions within each program; second, that these tensions often materialize and are perhaps best understood at the point where policy is implemented and “lived out”; and third, that such points of friction provide a useful focus for future dialogue between the hitherto largely parallel and disconnected trajectories of age- and dementia-friendly agendas. Fostering such a dialogue can strengthen an evolving policy critique and ultimately help refine policy-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 S1\",\"pages\":\"S19-S28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4988\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考虑了老龄化和痴呆症的政策叙述,它们做了什么,以及它们会导致什么。作者认为,早就应该对痴呆症进行新的政策叙述,作者反思了利用已建立的老年人友好城市和社区运动来帮助指导这种新叙述的价值。这篇文章提出了三点:第一,努力推动一个对老年人和最近对痴呆症友好的议程,忽略了每个项目内部的一系列紧张关系;其次,这些紧张关系往往会成为现实,而且可能在政策实施和“活出来”的时候才能得到最好的理解;第三,这些摩擦点为未来的对话提供了一个有用的焦点,这些对话是迄今为止在很大程度上平行的、互不相关的、对老年人和痴呆症友好的议程之间进行的。促进这种对话可以加强不断发展的政策批评,并最终有助于改进决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dementia, Narrative, and Place: What Can Be Learned from the Age-Friendly Movement?

This essay considers policy narratives of aging and dementia, what they do, and where they lead. It is argued that a renewed policy narrative of dementia is long overdue, and the authors reflect upon the value of drawing on the established age-friendly cities and communities movement to help guide the crafting of this new narrative. The essay develops three points: first, that efforts to promote an age- and latterly dementia-friendly agenda have elided a series of tensions within each program; second, that these tensions often materialize and are perhaps best understood at the point where policy is implemented and “lived out”; and third, that such points of friction provide a useful focus for future dialogue between the hitherto largely parallel and disconnected trajectories of age- and dementia-friendly agendas. Fostering such a dialogue can strengthen an evolving policy critique and ultimately help refine policy-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信