“为尊严而教”:护生尊严关怀关系训练的纵向评价。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Loredana Buonaccorso, Luca Ghirotto, Giovanna Amaducci, Silvia Soncini, Kaleci Shaniko, Giusy Iorio, Daniela Mecugni
{"title":"“为尊严而教”:护生尊严关怀关系训练的纵向评价。","authors":"Loredana Buonaccorso, Luca Ghirotto, Giovanna Amaducci, Silvia Soncini, Kaleci Shaniko, Giusy Iorio, Daniela Mecugni","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Teach for Dignity\\\": Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students.\",\"authors\":\"Loredana Buonaccorso, Luca Ghirotto, Giovanna Amaducci, Silvia Soncini, Kaleci Shaniko, Giusy Iorio, Daniela Mecugni\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者尊严是卫生保健的重要组成部分;然而,有证据表明,它往往没有得到充分的维护,特别是在护理专业的学生中。目的:评估护理尊严训练干预对护生知识的影响,并探讨护生毕业后如何将其应用于实践。方法:这是一项混合方法的研究,涉及一名心理肿瘤学家提供干预的二年级护理学生。定量数据通过培训前和培训后的尊严问卷收集,定性数据通过培训后1年和2年的焦点小组和半结构化访谈获得。分析包括对定量数据的McNemar检验和对定性结果的专题分析。结果:64名学生完成了培训前和培训后的评估。在情感和社会心理尊严相关领域观察到显著改善;但是,在程序领域出现了下降。结论:未来的干预措施应采取综合的方法,可能由护士和心理学家共同领导,以维护护理的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Teach for Dignity": Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students.

Background: Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.

Purpose: To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.

Methods: This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.

Results: Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.

Conclusions: Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信