{"title":"“为尊严而教”:护生尊严关怀关系训练的纵向评价。","authors":"Loredana Buonaccorso, Luca Ghirotto, Giovanna Amaducci, Silvia Soncini, Kaleci Shaniko, Giusy Iorio, Daniela Mecugni","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Teach for Dignity\\\": Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students.\",\"authors\":\"Loredana Buonaccorso, Luca Ghirotto, Giovanna Amaducci, Silvia Soncini, Kaleci Shaniko, Giusy Iorio, Daniela Mecugni\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Teach for Dignity": Longitudinal Evaluation of Training on Dignity-in-Care Relationships for Nursing Students.
Background: Patient dignity is a critical component of health care; however, evidence suggests that it is often inadequately maintained, particularly among nursing students.
Purpose: To assess the impact of a dignity-in-care training intervention on nursing students' knowledge and explore how they apply it in their practice after graduation.
Methods: This was a mixed-methods study involving second-year nursing students with interventions provided by a psycho-oncologist. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-training questionnaires on dignity, while qualitative data were obtained from focus groups and semi-structured interviews conducted 1 and 2 years after the training. The analysis included McNemar's test for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative results.
Results: Sixty-four students completed the pre- and post-training assessments. Significant improvements were observed in emotional and psychosocial dignity-related domains; however, declines were noted in procedural domains.
Conclusions: Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, possibly co-led by nurses and psychologists, to uphold dignity in care.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.