从驾驶表现预测中风幸存者的认知状态。

IF 4.4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stefan Delmas, Anjali Tiwari, Sharon N Poisson, Manfred Diehl, Neha Lodha
{"title":"从驾驶表现预测中风幸存者的认知状态。","authors":"Stefan Delmas, Anjali Tiwari, Sharon N Poisson, Manfred Diehl, Neha Lodha","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether simulated driving performance can reliably predict cognitive impairment in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitively impaired (<i>n</i> = 35) and normal (<i>n</i> = 54) stroke survivors completed a simulated driving course with reactive, distracted, and route-planning sections. Performance was assessed using lane departures, average speed, brake reaction time, task completion time, and route accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression models correctly distinguished cognitive status in 77.5% of cases for reactive and distracted driving, and 80.9% for route planning. Notably, the route planning task also achieved the highest classification rate of cognitively impaired participants (∼70%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses on the strongest predictors from each driving section revealed significant areas under the curve (AUCs), with optimal cutoffs identifying cognitively impaired participants at 70%-80% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide a critical foundation for developing simulator-based assessments as practical, functionally relevant screening tools for identifying cognitive impairment and determining driving readiness post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Stroke survivors were tested on simulated driving tasks.Driving metrics were lane departures, speed, reaction time, and route accuracy.Cognitive status was predicted with greater than 75% accuracy.Simulators may be a clinical tool for assessing post-stroke driving readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 3","pages":"e70183"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting cognitive status in stroke survivors from driving performance.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Delmas, Anjali Tiwari, Sharon N Poisson, Manfred Diehl, Neha Lodha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.70183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether simulated driving performance can reliably predict cognitive impairment in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitively impaired (<i>n</i> = 35) and normal (<i>n</i> = 54) stroke survivors completed a simulated driving course with reactive, distracted, and route-planning sections. Performance was assessed using lane departures, average speed, brake reaction time, task completion time, and route accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression models correctly distinguished cognitive status in 77.5% of cases for reactive and distracted driving, and 80.9% for route planning. Notably, the route planning task also achieved the highest classification rate of cognitively impaired participants (∼70%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses on the strongest predictors from each driving section revealed significant areas under the curve (AUCs), with optimal cutoffs identifying cognitively impaired participants at 70%-80% accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide a critical foundation for developing simulator-based assessments as practical, functionally relevant screening tools for identifying cognitive impairment and determining driving readiness post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Stroke survivors were tested on simulated driving tasks.Driving metrics were lane departures, speed, reaction time, and route accuracy.Cognitive status was predicted with greater than 75% accuracy.Simulators may be a clinical tool for assessing post-stroke driving readiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"e70183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定模拟驾驶行为是否可以可靠地预测脑卒中幸存者的认知障碍。方法:认知障碍(n = 35)和正常(n = 54)脑卒中幸存者完成了模拟驾驶课程,包括反应性、分心和路线规划部分。性能评估使用车道偏离、平均速度、制动反应时间、任务完成时间和路线准确性。结果:Logistic回归模型对反应性驾驶和分心驾驶的认知状态判别正确率为77.5%,对路线规划的认知状态判别正确率为80.9%。值得注意的是,路线规划任务在认知受损的参与者中也达到了最高的分类率(约70%)。受试者工作特征(ROC)对每个驾驶路段的最强预测因子进行分析,发现曲线下的显著区域(auc),识别认知障碍参与者的最佳截止点准确率为70%-80%。讨论:这些发现为开发基于模拟器的评估提供了重要的基础,作为识别认知障碍和确定卒中后驾驶准备的实用、功能相关的筛选工具。重点:中风幸存者在模拟驾驶任务中进行了测试。驾驶指标包括车道偏离、速度、反应时间和路线准确性。预测认知状态的准确率超过75%。模拟器可能是评估中风后驾驶准备的临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting cognitive status in stroke survivors from driving performance.

Predicting cognitive status in stroke survivors from driving performance.

Predicting cognitive status in stroke survivors from driving performance.

Predicting cognitive status in stroke survivors from driving performance.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine whether simulated driving performance can reliably predict cognitive impairment in stroke survivors.

Methods: Cognitively impaired (n = 35) and normal (n = 54) stroke survivors completed a simulated driving course with reactive, distracted, and route-planning sections. Performance was assessed using lane departures, average speed, brake reaction time, task completion time, and route accuracy.

Results: Logistic regression models correctly distinguished cognitive status in 77.5% of cases for reactive and distracted driving, and 80.9% for route planning. Notably, the route planning task also achieved the highest classification rate of cognitively impaired participants (∼70%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses on the strongest predictors from each driving section revealed significant areas under the curve (AUCs), with optimal cutoffs identifying cognitively impaired participants at 70%-80% accuracy.

Discussion: These findings provide a critical foundation for developing simulator-based assessments as practical, functionally relevant screening tools for identifying cognitive impairment and determining driving readiness post-stroke.

Highlights: Stroke survivors were tested on simulated driving tasks.Driving metrics were lane departures, speed, reaction time, and route accuracy.Cognitive status was predicted with greater than 75% accuracy.Simulators may be a clinical tool for assessing post-stroke driving readiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信