益生菌预防早产儿脓毒症:临床实践的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rizka Maulida, Radhian Amandito, Rinawati Rohsiswatmo, Amarila Malik
{"title":"益生菌预防早产儿脓毒症:临床实践的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rizka Maulida, Radhian Amandito, Rinawati Rohsiswatmo, Amarila Malik","doi":"10.4178/epih.e2025051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Late-onset sepsis (LOS), occurring after 72 hours of birth, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality especially in preterm neonates. Probiotics have been proposed as a preventive strategy to enhance gut health, modulate immune responses, and reduce the incidence of neonatal sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics in preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates, with particular attention to the impact of different strains and dosage regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies included preterm neonates (≤36 weeks gestational age) with culture-proven LOS and focused on probiotic supplementation. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and ProQuest up to July 28, 2024. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) was applied to assess study quality, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. Additionally, the certainty of the body of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies including 8,040 preterm neonates were reviewed. Meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotics significantly reduced the incidence of LOS (pooled risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95). Greater efficacy was observed with multistrain formulations (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95) and low-dose regimens (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91). Probiotic supplementation was also associated with shorter hospital stays and a trend toward lower mortality, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To effectively reduce LOS in preterm neonates, specific combinations of multistrain probiotics and optimized dosing strategies may provide the most benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":48543,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2025051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probiotics for preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Rizka Maulida, Radhian Amandito, Rinawati Rohsiswatmo, Amarila Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.4178/epih.e2025051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Late-onset sepsis (LOS), occurring after 72 hours of birth, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality especially in preterm neonates. Probiotics have been proposed as a preventive strategy to enhance gut health, modulate immune responses, and reduce the incidence of neonatal sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics in preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates, with particular attention to the impact of different strains and dosage regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies included preterm neonates (≤36 weeks gestational age) with culture-proven LOS and focused on probiotic supplementation. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and ProQuest up to July 28, 2024. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) was applied to assess study quality, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. Additionally, the certainty of the body of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies including 8,040 preterm neonates were reviewed. Meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotics significantly reduced the incidence of LOS (pooled risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95). Greater efficacy was observed with multistrain formulations (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95) and low-dose regimens (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91). Probiotic supplementation was also associated with shorter hospital stays and a trend toward lower mortality, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To effectively reduce LOS in preterm neonates, specific combinations of multistrain probiotics and optimized dosing strategies may provide the most benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2025051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:迟发性脓毒症(LOS),发生在出生72小时后,是发病率和死亡率的重要原因,特别是在早产儿中。益生菌已被提出作为一种预防策略,以增强肠道健康,调节免疫反应,并减少新生儿败血症的发生率。我们旨在评估益生菌在预防早产新生儿脓毒症中的有效性,特别关注不同菌株和剂量方案的影响。方法:符合条件的研究包括培养证实的LOS的早产儿(≤36周胎龄),并侧重于益生菌补充。综合检索通过PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus和ProQuest在MEDLINE进行,截止到2024年7月28日。采用经修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)评估研究质量,并使用Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4版进行随机效应荟萃分析。此外,使用GRADE方法(建议评估、发展和评估分级)评估证据体的确定性。结果:回顾了31项研究,包括8040例早产儿。荟萃分析显示,益生菌可显著降低LOS的发生率(合并风险比[RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95)。多菌株制剂(RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95)和低剂量方案(RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91)疗效更佳。益生菌补充也与更短的住院时间和更低的死亡率趋势相关,尽管后者没有达到统计学意义。结论:多菌种益生菌的特定组合和优化给药策略可能是有效降低早产儿LOS的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probiotics for preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical practice.

Objectives: Late-onset sepsis (LOS), occurring after 72 hours of birth, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality especially in preterm neonates. Probiotics have been proposed as a preventive strategy to enhance gut health, modulate immune responses, and reduce the incidence of neonatal sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics in preventing neonatal sepsis in preterm neonates, with particular attention to the impact of different strains and dosage regimens.

Methods: Eligible studies included preterm neonates (≤36 weeks gestational age) with culture-proven LOS and focused on probiotic supplementation. Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and ProQuest up to July 28, 2024. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) was applied to assess study quality, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. Additionally, the certainty of the body of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

Results: Thirty-one studies including 8,040 preterm neonates were reviewed. Meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotics significantly reduced the incidence of LOS (pooled risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95). Greater efficacy was observed with multistrain formulations (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.95) and low-dose regimens (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91). Probiotic supplementation was also associated with shorter hospital stays and a trend toward lower mortality, although the latter did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: To effectively reduce LOS in preterm neonates, specific combinations of multistrain probiotics and optimized dosing strategies may provide the most benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Health
Epidemiology and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Health (epiH) is an electronic journal publishing papers in all areas of epidemiology and public health. It is indexed on PubMed Central and the scope is wide-ranging: including descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology; primary preventive measures; screening approaches and secondary prevention; clinical epidemiology; and all aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases prevention. The epiH publishes original research, and also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, cohort profiles and data profiles, epidemic and case investigations, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信