{"title":"人工中的“自然”:代孕者在医疗保健系统中的生殖素养。","authors":"Orit Chorowicz Bar-Am","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how demographic changes among Israeli surrogates have transformed their approaches to medical authority and bodily autonomy within the surrogacy process. We explore the changing medical experiences of second-generation Israeli surrogates, marking a significant new trend that differs from earlier approaches. To this end, we conducted narrative interviews with 47 retired surrogates in Israel between July 2022 and March 2023, employing qualitative methodology and inductive thematic analysis. While first-generation surrogates typically embraced medicalization to create distance between themselves and the pregnancy, our findings demonstrate that contemporary surrogates actively integrate their natural reproductive capabilities into surrogacy protocols. This research suggests that demographic changes—from single mothers with lower socioeconomic status to predominantly middle-class, educated married women—have reshaped surrogate agency. Consequently, we introduce two key concepts: \"repro-tech literacy,\" the specialized knowledge that surrogates acquire to navigate ART along with their embodied knowledge, and \"hybrid model of reproduction,\" where surrogates strategically combine medical advancements with natural capabilities. Contemporary surrogates actively negotiate various medical aspects, including hormonal treatments, embryo transfers, and delivery methods, often challenging standardized protocols that they perceive as unnecessary for IVF patients without reproductive constraints. This research presents new theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of surrogate agency in reproductive medicine and challenge existing paradigms of medicalization in third-party reproduction. Our findings reflect a broader cultural shift toward selective medicalization and have practical implications for developing more ethical, patient-centered approaches to third-party reproduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118579"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"natural\\\" in the artificial: Surrogates’ reproductive literacy in navigating the health care system\",\"authors\":\"Orit Chorowicz Bar-Am\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines how demographic changes among Israeli surrogates have transformed their approaches to medical authority and bodily autonomy within the surrogacy process. We explore the changing medical experiences of second-generation Israeli surrogates, marking a significant new trend that differs from earlier approaches. To this end, we conducted narrative interviews with 47 retired surrogates in Israel between July 2022 and March 2023, employing qualitative methodology and inductive thematic analysis. While first-generation surrogates typically embraced medicalization to create distance between themselves and the pregnancy, our findings demonstrate that contemporary surrogates actively integrate their natural reproductive capabilities into surrogacy protocols. This research suggests that demographic changes—from single mothers with lower socioeconomic status to predominantly middle-class, educated married women—have reshaped surrogate agency. Consequently, we introduce two key concepts: \\\"repro-tech literacy,\\\" the specialized knowledge that surrogates acquire to navigate ART along with their embodied knowledge, and \\\"hybrid model of reproduction,\\\" where surrogates strategically combine medical advancements with natural capabilities. Contemporary surrogates actively negotiate various medical aspects, including hormonal treatments, embryo transfers, and delivery methods, often challenging standardized protocols that they perceive as unnecessary for IVF patients without reproductive constraints. This research presents new theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of surrogate agency in reproductive medicine and challenge existing paradigms of medicalization in third-party reproduction. Our findings reflect a broader cultural shift toward selective medicalization and have practical implications for developing more ethical, patient-centered approaches to third-party reproduction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The "natural" in the artificial: Surrogates’ reproductive literacy in navigating the health care system
This study examines how demographic changes among Israeli surrogates have transformed their approaches to medical authority and bodily autonomy within the surrogacy process. We explore the changing medical experiences of second-generation Israeli surrogates, marking a significant new trend that differs from earlier approaches. To this end, we conducted narrative interviews with 47 retired surrogates in Israel between July 2022 and March 2023, employing qualitative methodology and inductive thematic analysis. While first-generation surrogates typically embraced medicalization to create distance between themselves and the pregnancy, our findings demonstrate that contemporary surrogates actively integrate their natural reproductive capabilities into surrogacy protocols. This research suggests that demographic changes—from single mothers with lower socioeconomic status to predominantly middle-class, educated married women—have reshaped surrogate agency. Consequently, we introduce two key concepts: "repro-tech literacy," the specialized knowledge that surrogates acquire to navigate ART along with their embodied knowledge, and "hybrid model of reproduction," where surrogates strategically combine medical advancements with natural capabilities. Contemporary surrogates actively negotiate various medical aspects, including hormonal treatments, embryo transfers, and delivery methods, often challenging standardized protocols that they perceive as unnecessary for IVF patients without reproductive constraints. This research presents new theoretical frameworks that advance our understanding of surrogate agency in reproductive medicine and challenge existing paradigms of medicalization in third-party reproduction. Our findings reflect a broader cultural shift toward selective medicalization and have practical implications for developing more ethical, patient-centered approaches to third-party reproduction.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.